I would say yes, but there are obviously the many things that would make a full ban look bad that libshits like to conflate with the idea of regulating abortion at all. Rape, significant health risks bla bla bla. I think abortion should be regulated heavily, as in the norm should be
>No, woman you can't kill your child just because he's a fetus. Have the baby and put it up for adoption if you are still hate it at that point.
But obvious medical exemptions apply that go without saying.
Along with values both christian and agnostic moral, the best thing about making abortion not an option is that it would help restore natural gender roles and deal a big blow to feminism, it would also force women to be accountable for wanton sexual activity, which would be quite cathartic to see play out, especially right after the law would pass. My beleif is that many women would fuck up, have kids, and have their natural species propagation instinct to come in and make them realize they were made to reproduce and care for the next generation, not brown adult men and sex obsessed grooming victims. Seeing as to how many of the problems we deal with are from the parental instinct misdirection compromized female vote, rerouting that instinct to the proper target, their offspring, would shift the sex linked political demographics we see today.
Banning birth control and abortion, while not feasible, would be a massive blow to the economic oligarch's divisive plans. It would make having children, and thus family, and thus further social cohesion and independence, and thus resistance against the top down societal control by the manegerial class, almost 100% linked to sex drive of women! A natural incentive!