You don't know that. There might be a technological advanced invention that acts like a uterus and makes it possible. So why are you trying to make a point of how a baby needs to be in a uterus to survive or not? Like, what is your point? That a fetus can't survive without its mother? Well neither can a baby. You keep saying "clump of fetal tissue" but it's still a baby. There's no hard cut off.
It's entirely possible that scientists will be able to turn sperm into babies in a lab at some point, so does that mean that sperm should be given full constitutional rights as well and male masturbation should be classified as murder?
Stop calling it fetal tissue. And yeah masturbation would probably be illegal in an ideal world but it's impossible to actually police that. Like, when do you think a fetus is viable?
>Stop calling what it clearly is!!!
You're just a bunch of human tissue.
I already explained when a fetus is viable: when it becomes possible for it to survive outside of the womb, which is usually after at least 24 weeks.
That's a positive doe, people that are willing to kill their own should be put through life threatening danger. Aside from reaping what they sow it's also a good deterrent
Dude, that's 6 months. A baby is kicking by then. You are fucking disgusting.
No, but in an ideal world people would just obey the law without having to be policed.
>Smug anime face.A non-viable clump of cells in a woman's uterus isn't a baby.
Sorry, but your argument fails because you forgot to include a smug anime face.
Could you surgically move it to a different uterus? You sound like a seething rape victim btw
Most abortions (like 93%) happen before an embryo has a heartbeat or a hemispheric brain, it is essentially just tissue by that point
That's why he said that should be the limit, retard
im going to rape you nigger
