• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

VOTE! The REAL Thrembo....

Who Is The Real Thrembo?

  • ThremboSchlog (me, Warrior-Z's fourth very white wife and legal slave. Descendant of Adolf Hitler)

    Votes: 6 11.5%
  • Thrembo88 (Ϫ Whitest option Ϫ)

    Votes: 17 32.7%
  • thrembolone (valid turkroachxista 🏳️‍⚧️🇹🇷🪳)

    Votes: 15 28.8%
  • Thrembo (LITERAL PEDOPHILE)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6ixthrembo

    Votes: 7 13.5%
  • JOON TROON KIKES ARE FAGGOTS I DID NOT ADD THAT FIRST OPTION, JANNIES REVERSE THAT KIKE

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • condolana

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • https://blog.soyjak.st/attachments/c7e27d734b4d29fb55e651d6e5b9b5366e56b858_hq-jpg.172731/

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • Jannies are faggots I never added the extra shit in the top response they're just being obsessed

    Votes: 1 1.9%

  • Total voters
    52
The same story is reiterated in multiple hadiths confirmed to be by Aisha and close acquaintances of Muhmamed like Abu Juhayfa and Abu Talha. What evidence do you have it for it not being Aisha?
Regardless of whether Aisha and her companions reported this, the hadith in question does not resolve the issue by itself. The basis of hadith looks at the narrators, contexts, chains of transmission, and the original meaning of phrases. Many people including scholars in that tradition have looked at the hadith and suggested that the strong language only applied to specific instances of idolatry and doesn't constitute a blanket prohibition against any types of drawings. So it is not conclusive just because a handful of close companions related this attribution, either way traditional hadith scholarship recognizes this as being a part of a larger conversation.
Reverse Burden of Proof Fallacy
Hows that shifting the burden when you made the claim?
I don't have a twitter, my man.
Prove it.
 
Regardless of whether Aisha and her companions reported this, the hadith in question does not resolve the issue by itself. The basis of hadith looks at the narrators, contexts, chains of transmission, and the original meaning of phrases. Many people including scholars in that tradition have looked at the hadith and suggested that the strong language only applied to specific instances of idolatry and doesn't constitute a blanket prohibition against any types of drawings. So it is not conclusive just because a handful of close companions related this attribution, either way traditional hadith scholarship recognizes this as being a part of a larger conversation.
Since you have provided no reasoning for why any of the hadiths only relate to specific case of idolatry, I can just dismiss it entirely
 
1.png

>
 
False Dichotomy fallacy
Prove that rq.
@SmallAnus MODS he's erping
Hows that erping bitch?
Since you have provided no reasoning for why any of the hadiths only relate to specific case of idolatry, I can just dismiss it entirely
To disregard hundreds of years of nuanced scholarship simply because you don’t feel like engaging with the background is just lazy LMAOOO. The important not here is that scholars like Ibn Hamdan and Al-Nawawi did not just pick idolatry for its own sake retard, they legit evaluated the chains of transmission, the historical context, and the meaning that was intended, including wanting to use the selected hadiths to make a distinction cuck ass slut. Their arguments show that the harsh language was directed against idolatry and making complete statues, and not for all forms of image or drawing. If you cannot see this then your justification for dismissal is actually a lack of intellectual debate on your part.
 
Back
Top