dino
Guest
Reverse Burden of Proof Fallacy
Reverse Burden of Proof Fallacy
The seethe is unreal@meijak Yo loser stop masturbating your TBP to lolicon weird cuck.
Regardless of whether Aisha and her companions reported this, the hadith in question does not resolve the issue by itself. The basis of hadith looks at the narrators, contexts, chains of transmission, and the original meaning of phrases. Many people including scholars in that tradition have looked at the hadith and suggested that the strong language only applied to specific instances of idolatry and doesn't constitute a blanket prohibition against any types of drawings. So it is not conclusive just because a handful of close companions related this attribution, either way traditional hadith scholarship recognizes this as being a part of a larger conversation.The same story is reiterated in multiple hadiths confirmed to be by Aisha and close acquaintances of Muhmamed like Abu Juhayfa and Abu Talha. What evidence do you have it for it not being Aisha?
Hows that shifting the burden when you made the claim?Reverse Burden of Proof Fallacy
Prove it.I don't have a twitter, my man.
I don't use social media btw. Did ben shapiro fuck you up, lil nigga?
Dont call me your man, pussy, I am your master. Now kneel cuck.I don't have a twitter, my man.
This is by definition a social media lole, cuck ass slut really thought he can slip away don't fold bitch.I don't use social media btw. Did ben shapiro fuck you up, lil nigga?
You're my bitch, what do you mean?Dont call me your man, pussy, I am your master. Now kneel cuck.
@SmallAnus MODS he's erpingDont call me your man, pussy, I am your master. Now kneel cuck.
That means he's gay for youYou're my bitch, what do you mean?
False Dichotomy fallacyHows that shifting the burden when you made the claim?
Since you have provided no reasoning for why any of the hadiths only relate to specific case of idolatry, I can just dismiss it entirelyRegardless of whether Aisha and her companions reported this, the hadith in question does not resolve the issue by itself. The basis of hadith looks at the narrators, contexts, chains of transmission, and the original meaning of phrases. Many people including scholars in that tradition have looked at the hadith and suggested that the strong language only applied to specific instances of idolatry and doesn't constitute a blanket prohibition against any types of drawings. So it is not conclusive just because a handful of close companions related this attribution, either way traditional hadith scholarship recognizes this as being a part of a larger conversation.
just think about it for a momentpussy, I am your master. Now kneel cuck.
Prove that rq.False Dichotomy fallacy
Hows that erping bitch?@SmallAnus MODS he's erping
To disregard hundreds of years of nuanced scholarship simply because you don’t feel like engaging with the background is just lazy LMAOOO. The important not here is that scholars like Ibn Hamdan and Al-Nawawi did not just pick idolatry for its own sake retard, they legit evaluated the chains of transmission, the historical context, and the meaning that was intended, including wanting to use the selected hadiths to make a distinction cuck ass slut. Their arguments show that the harsh language was directed against idolatry and making complete statues, and not for all forms of image or drawing. If you cannot see this then your justification for dismissal is actually a lack of intellectual debate on your part.Since you have provided no reasoning for why any of the hadiths only relate to specific case of idolatry, I can just dismiss it entirely