• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

TRVTHNVKE All muslims should be banned for breaking rule 2

BIGGEST TRVKE OF THE HIGHEST DEGREE
I come back to this thread 2 hours later and still no refutation. Yup, we taking this W home.
1724339069205y.png
 
You can't drink me I'm THE PEPSIMAN but I can give you a pepsi to drink, also I actually like coca cola geg
So PepsiMan isn’t made out of Pepsi?

What refutation are you talking about
I wasn’t referring to you but the one I gave to this pooner named Ytsuken.
 
So PepsiMan isn’t made out of Pepsi?


I wasn’t referring to you but the one I gave to this pooner named Ytsuken.
I'm not actually sure if I am made out of Pepsi or not
also Ytsuken can't be a pooner he types like a dude I can smell pooners from miles away and my tranny alarm doesn't go off near him
 
To even be a muslim you have to agree that mohammed was the perfect human being and should be a role model
Mohammed was a paedophile (Also a sex slave owner who had multiple wives) he married a 6 year old girl named Aisha, and had sexual intercourse (rape) with her at 9 years old
Conclusion: Muslims agree that a paedophile was the perfect human being, and a role model, therefore they advocate and justify paedophilia, making them eligible for a ban based on rule 2
Banning princess sparkles was a step in the right direction
It isn't stated in the Quran if Muhammad married a 6 year old, and the hadiths contradict each other somewhat on the matter of Aisha's age. That being said, to deny that Muhammad was a pedophile does require rejecting some very influential Hadith
 
You didn't give a refutation either. Cherry picking which Hadiths you think are real is not the argument you think it is
That's presupposing that it's not a refutation based off of cherrypicking when you didnt give a justification for that claim.
 
Back
Top