TRVTHNVKE All muslims should be banned for breaking rule 2

BIGGEST TRVKE OF THE HIGHEST DEGREE
our look towards certain things over time
Posting soylita before was acceptable on soywojack.bbc but now its against the rules
It sounds like your take on it isn't "being romantically involved with children is wrong" but rather "breaking the law that says being romantically involved with children is wrong is wrong."
 
The more you argue about Islam itt the more it looks like Muslims won, like, why almost 7 pages of leaking about obvious bait?

20932.jpeg


image-asset.png


SCOREBOARD
 
>Thread was made by a fag who goons to gore and loves Brenton Tarrant
I've never seen anyone normal make these types of threads for some reason
why can’t we all respect eachother
 
soylita and shoyta was always unacceptable?
1:53
It sounds like your take on it isn't "being romantically involved with children is wrong" but rather "breaking the law that says being romantically involved with children is wrong is wrong."
being romantically involved with children IS wrong
but judging history with today's standards is not right
 
being romantically involved with children IS wrong
You said it wasn't wrong back then because different times, so, by extension it isn't always wrong. According to your own words there are circumstances where it is acceptable to do that.
 
Is that illegal or pedophilic in any way?
No
Saying nigger 24/7 like an autist is illegal in cucked countries like France where are you allegedly from but you still do it. Double standards much?
 
Saying nigger 24/7 like an autist is illegal in cucked countries like France where are you allegedly from but you still do it. Double standards much?
such a fucking nanny state bro
 
You said it wasn't wrong back then because different times, so, by extension it isn't always wrong. According to your own words there are circumstances where it is acceptable to do that.
Nigger I don't think that child marriage acceptable in any circumstances
But judging old times with todays standards makes it look fucked up
 
But judging old times with todays standards makes it look fucked up
It wasn't fucked up because of different circumstances -------> The circumstances determine how wrong child marriage is
That's the implication of your words. It's not even a leap in logic.
 
It wasn't fucked up because of different circumstances -------> The circumstances determine how wrong child marriage is
That's the implication of your words. It's not even a leap in logic.
Our look to some things changed over time
 
Back
Top