• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

TRVTHNVKE All muslims should be banned for breaking rule 2

BIGGEST TRVKE OF THE HIGHEST DEGREE
our look towards certain things over time
Posting soylita before was acceptable on soywojack.bbc but now its against the rules
It sounds like your take on it isn't "being romantically involved with children is wrong" but rather "breaking the law that says being romantically involved with children is wrong is wrong."
 
The more you argue about Islam itt the more it looks like Muslims won, like, why almost 7 pages of leaking about obvious bait?

20932.jpeg


image-asset.png


SCOREBOARD
 
soylita and shoyta was always unacceptable?
1:53
It sounds like your take on it isn't "being romantically involved with children is wrong" but rather "breaking the law that says being romantically involved with children is wrong is wrong."
being romantically involved with children IS wrong
but judging history with today's standards is not right
 
You said it wasn't wrong back then because different times, so, by extension it isn't always wrong. According to your own words there are circumstances where it is acceptable to do that.
Nigger I don't think that child marriage acceptable in any circumstances
But judging old times with todays standards makes it look fucked up
 
But judging old times with todays standards makes it look fucked up
It wasn't fucked up because of different circumstances -------> The circumstances determine how wrong child marriage is
That's the implication of your words. It's not even a leap in logic.
 
Back
Top