TRVTHNVKE All muslims should be banned for breaking rule 2

[Warrior-Z]

i dont think the hadith argument really matters to warrior-cp because hes a non-sectanigger, arguing about ts raisin with him is like talking to a wall

Even though I point out the philosophical contradictions in your arguments.

 

[please enter a valid name]

words

blud its stated a ton of times in many hadith collections amongst these some of the most reliable ones Bukhari, Muslim and also Sunan Abi Dawud and Ibn Majah, all 4 of these being part of the 6 books, 2 of these being considered sahih and the most important hadith collections for Sunnis, which make up 87-90% of the Muslim population.
Across these hadiths its stated many times specifically, that the prophet married aisha at 6-7 years and "consummated" her when she was 9, the fact that aisha is said to be young is supported by some hadiths narrating that she played with dolls, yes women can play with dolls too but its much more likely for a small child to be doing so, especially during that time.
I would be willing to believe the "it was a mistake" claim if the marriage and consummation was stated in 1 hadith but its stated several times which makes it seem very unlikely for me that it was just a retarded confusion.
Most of the sources ive seen you provide are much weaker and unlike hadiths didnt have the rigorous verification of chains of narration, if im not wrong i think once you mentioned something about Al-Tabari as one of your sources, but didnt this guy prioritize the collection of historical narrations without verifying their authenticity? making his book a mix of Sahih, Daif and even fabricated narrations.
i dont know man, it just seems pretty unlikely to me that she was 18 with all of this evidence
the fact that Aisha was 9 at consummation is still traditionally accepted by most scholars and sunnis either way

 

[MoonMetropolis]

To even be a muslim you have to agree that mohammed was the perfect human being and should be a role model
Mohammed was a paedophile (Also a sex slave owner who had multiple wives) he married a 6 year old girl named Aisha, and had sexual intercourse (rape) with her at 9 years old
Conclusion: Muslims agree that a paedophile was the perfect human being, and a role model, therefore they advocate and justify paedophilia, making them eligible for a ban based on rule 2
Banning princess sparkles was a step in the right direction

Just a reminder: this person goons to infant gore.

Here's Ytsuken posting horrific baby gore on the Encyclopedia Dramatica Forums (click at your own risk): https://archive.is/OHdem

Because of this, he is never getting unbanned. We don't want degenerates who crank their hog to dead babies on this site.

 

[Zeed]

Just a reminder: this person goons to infant gore.

Here's Ytsuken posting horrific baby gore on the Encyclopedia Dramatica Forums (click at your own risk): https://archive.is/OHdem

Because of this, he is never getting unbanned. We don't want degenerates to crank their hog to dead babies on this site.

It's just gore of babies. I don't think they goon to it. Still fucked up to post it and laugh at it though. I also saw terrycrews there? Why are there so many EDF immigrants on this site? Good thing most of them left for the Shroom.

 

[please enter a valid name]

It's just gore of babies. I don't think they goon to it. Still fucked up to post it and laugh at it though. I also saw terrycrews there? Why are there so many EDF immigrants on this site? Good thing most of them left for the Shroom.

thats @Soyteen Liker
>many edf immigrants in this site good thing most of them left for the shroom
marge 99% of them were nished for rule 2 geg, i think steve and jerry are the last edfcucks in the soysphere and they dont use the site anymore

 

[Iberius]

To even be a muslim you have to agree that mohammed was the perfect human being and should be a role model
Mohammed was a paedophile (Also a sex slave owner who had multiple wives) he married a 6 year old girl named Aisha, and had sexual intercourse (rape) with her at 9 years old
Conclusion: Muslims agree that a paedophile was the perfect human being, and a role model, therefore they advocate and justify paedophilia, making them eligible for a ban based on rule 2
Banning princess sparkles was a step in the right direction

T. Banned for rule 2

 

[Peter Potamus]

That's presupposing that it's not a refutation based off of cherrypicking when you didnt give a justification for that claim.

The only argument for dismissing the Hadiths is "I don't like this so I disregard it because it doesn't fit into my modern Western worldviews, so I need to make my religion look less terrible." And most Muslims in the middle east would call you an infidel for this. So all you're accomplishing is making both real Muslims and non Muslims disagree with you. The same source for the Aisha is 6 and 9 Hadith is used to justify other shit they do as well not just that specific thing. So it is cherry picking. Not to mention the Quran says women can marry at puberty, which doesn't mean they're an adult.

 

[Stockstall]

Just a reminder: this person goons to infant gore.

Here's Ytsuken posting horrific baby gore on the Encyclopedia Dramatica Forums (click at your own risk): https://archive.is/OHdem

Because of this, he is never getting unbanned. We don't want degenerates to crank their hog to dead babies on this site.

Atleast you won't release this guy, that's a relief.

 

[Modderola]

sage