Ytsuken
ƎUИИ
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2025
- Messages
- 5,964
Well maybe not EVERY personevery person before 1917 was a pedophile
Well maybe not EVERY personevery person before 1917 was a pedophile
AOC laws were not a thing before 1917Well maybe not EVERY person
Yeah but it's possible to not be a pedophile without aoc laws existingAOC laws was not a thing before 1917
maybe %1 of the populationYeah but it's possible to not be a pedophile without aoc laws existing
If that's true then that's disgustingGod in the new testament impregnated a teenager so that she could give birth to himself. Peak narcissistic pedo fantasy goonfuel; we should ban all Christians too.
1st Corinthians 7:36God in the new testament impregnated a teenager so that she could give birth to himself. Peak narcissistic pedo fantasy goonfuel; we should ban all Christians too.
>virgin birth is... LE PEDOPHILICIf that's true then that's disgusting
@baqqrih you know a lot about christianity, can you explain?
>virgin birth is... LE PEDOPHILIC
No, this is what I mean by disgustingimpregnated a teenager
I don't think your ancestor had AOC lawsIf that's true then that's horrible
You should stop using generalizing terms like these, again, You can be a non-pedophile without aoc laws
maybe %1 of themYou should stop using generalizing terms like these, again, You can be a non-pedophile without aoc laws
How do you feel about this?maybe %1 of them
Different timesHow do you feel about this?
So it wasn't reprehensible is what you're saying?Different times
people used to live much shorter
For that time?So it wasn't reprehensible is what you're saying?
Why?For that time?
yes
But doing the same thing today wouldn't be right