Shit No One Cares About Would you rather have a future led by China or India?

SNOCA is the superior and schlog endorsed version of SNCA. It is grammatically consistent and shlog-user preferred.

Which one?


  • Total voters
    50
considering that Trvmp is going to mass-import poojeets
Stop being Chinapilled, the executive order banning dei in gov't founded colleges means only whites and Chinese will get in (98% pajeets come over for college, which they can't get in now). Trump just said he agreed with Elon musk to maintain the image, his actions speak otherwise, like forcing Ramaswamy to step down for talking shit about Americans. The whole "maga loves pajeets" narrative was just a spic psyop, I knew it from the beginning .
 
China is a deeply flawed society, but atleast they try to be civilised wherever they can manage that even if that means they create themselves a dystopian society
 
Stop being Chinapilled, the executive order banning dei in gov't founded colleges means only whites and Chinese will get in (98% pajeets come over for college, which they can't get in now). Trump just said he agreed with Elon musk to maintain the image, his actions speak otherwise, like forcing Ramaswamy to step down for talking shit about Americans. The whole "maga loves pajeets" narrative was just a spic psyop, I knew it from the beginning .
I hope you're right. Even shitskins from South America are better than pajeets, there's not a single other race that can compete with them. Jeets stink, they're ugly, they have thick accents, usually fail to integrate into society, tend to hire only other jeets, have poor work ethic, low IQs, I could go on and on. Every other race has at least one positive (even just mildly) trait that they can use to blend in.
 
That said, China hands down. That does not reflect positively on China though, some people seem to think that because China is superior to the USA and India in certain aspects it MUST be better overall (true in the case of India) but most of China is dirt poor and gross, imagine if Mississippi was the majority of the US (still better than India)
 
China is a poor country trying to become civilized while India is completely uncivilizable. anyone who would rather be led by india is either completely delusional, uncivilized or indian (both).
 
Both. Let's have a Chinese world order, where most of the world is China aligned and China dominates it's sphere. And at the same time having a western world that is completely ruled by Indians.
 
INDIA MENTIONED! 🇮🇳🗿
India because their government is probably too incompetent to be authoritaryan like the 'cp so it won't be 1984.
Also India was aryan first maam
Considering the direction of the Modi government and Indira gandhi the Indian government has plenty potential to be authoritarian,
albeit it is moreso like Zaire and Idi's Uganda, a 3rd-world corrupt shithole at constant war with itself, than a high-trust well-oiled totalitAryan machine.

Also the H1b haplogroup isn't indo-iranian, but dravidian. Indo-european peoples are mostly R1a and R1b haplogroup (Scandinavians are I1 and baltics I2), meaning most indians are as indo-european as chinese people, and less indo-aryan than some africans and the maldives' natives. At most the kashmiri or sikh minorities could be considered indo-european, but the muslim and hindu majority groups of india and pakistan certainly aren't
 
Jeet fertility rate is already dropping and at a faster rate than any predictions made by the UN, there is not going to be a future led by anyone, at this point
 
India is trying to imitate the west, China wants to destroy the west
So yeah i would rather have shitskin rulers (doe Quebec is under Canadian control so im allredy ruled by chinks geg)
 
India is trying to imitate the west, China wants to destroy the west
So yeah i would rather have shitskin rulers (doe Quebec is under Canadian control so im allredy ruled by chinks geg)
Quebec will be independent soon though
 
Quebec will be independent soon though
Geg never happening, woud'nt even change shit anyway the economy would stay the same. Biggest change i would see is probably the de-anglophication of Montreal.
 
Geg never happening, woud'nt even change shit anyway the economy would stay the same. Biggest change i would see is probably the de-anglophication of Montreal.
You mean you don't actually want to be separate from Canada?
 
You mean you don't actually want to be separate from Canada?
I do want independance but i dont think it would actually change anything.
Canada is reliant on the saint laurent for maritime trade with europe and the east coast of the US, combined with the fact Canada produces ALOT of its electricity in Quebec it would result in Canada sending us as much if not more money as it allredy does to Quebec. As i said the biggest change would be that we might have better language protection laws but we could allredy do that while under the Canadian occupation.
 
I do want independance but i dont think it would actually change anything.
Canada is reliant on the saint laurent for maritime trade with europe and the east coast of the US, combined with the fact Canada produces ALOT of its electricity in Quebec it would result in Canada sending us as much if not more money as it allredy does to Quebec.
Maybe you could strike a deal with new York state to supply utilities to until you get your own plants up and running just speculating.
 
Maybe you could strike a deal with new York state to supply utilities to until you get your own plants up and running just speculating.
We allredy own the electrical plants under the Quebec owned company of Hydro Quebec, in fact we are the ones supplying New york state with electricity
 
Back
Top