Shit EVERYBODY Cares About! Total Muslim Death

You WILL care!
>Saying, "99% of Muslims believe it" is argumentum ad populum due to the fact that truth is not determined by consensus, REETARD
WRONG you are incapable of understanding arguments because you don't want to understand arguments you like to shadowbox with strawmen so you don't have to confront reality
The argument that "99% of muzzies believe it" proves that IF this incredibly important fact about pisslam is a complete lie by some of their most important people and that everyone believes it and there being legislation in the modern day being justified by it, then pisslam is a SHIT religion and apprently the INFALLIBE PROPHET FOR ALL TIME didn't think it was IMPORTANT to say that PEDOPHILIA WAS BAD

>Blurting out that the historical calculations of Ibn Jareer al-Tabari "Baptist Bible maths" is a straw man--because they are based on Islamic historiography, not external theology, dumbass.
Actually I can disregard it because you're citing a literally who google doc to completely handwave all consensus on the topic because you're mad
All of your people's talking points hinge on diluting conversation with bible maths that you don't actually read or understand like the whataboutism with rebecca and joseph, citing random websites that don't even agree with your conclusion, all this to, again, COMPLETELY disregard TWO SEPERATE ACCOUNTS by TWO of the MOST CITED people as INTENTIONAL FABRICATIONS
"Bad faith" is an understatement
Debate me pussy come back and stop squirming when I confront you and cowering when I destroy you’re arguements
 
no muslim who stays in their lands is an enemy of mine same goes with Africans and well really and non-white people group I don’t mind them when they stay in their native habitat I only take problem when they come into western nations with the help of Jews and globalists
@Alextremo2TheMax whats your thoughts on my TRVKE
 
Your assertion that "99% of Muslims who believe it make it so" is, in itself, a logical ERROR, CUCKOLD. Simply because widespread belief comes from the followers of a religion doesn't provide evidence for the truth of their beliefs WHATSOEVER KEK. Scholarship isn't some kind of popularity contest, retard, it's a search for evidence. To assume that since one historical detail is contested, Islam as a religion is "useless," is simply a different kind of logical error. Disputes over historical accounts shouldn't invalidate a religion any more than the question of some biblical figures belittles Christianity. Calling Ibn Jareer al-Tabari, a well-respected Islamic historian, “a book no one’s heard about” is ridiculous. Ibn Jareer became one of the most quoted figures in Islamic historiography, and your feeble attempt to brush aside his work displays ignorance, like the little bitch you are. You pointed out "two separate accounts," but provided no argument for their infallibility, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Historical narratives do not usually conform to a single story and cross-referencing alternate timelines as proposed here is standard scholarly practice. Not admitting to this shows that you are more concerned about dogma than dialogue. You keep alluding to "Bible maths" instead of dealing with the actual evidence: Abd al-Rahman's age at Badr provides a reasonable timeline for Aisha's marriage age to be closer to 18-19. This is not "madness", you think you're some kind of Spartan or what? It is a rational line of inquiry. :kek::kek::kek::kek::kek::kek::kek:
>Your assertion that "99% of Muslims who believe it make it so" is, in itself, a logical ERROR, CUCKOLD. Simply because widespread belief comes from the followers of a religion doesn't provide evidence for the truth of their beliefs WHATSOEVER KEK.
When I can draw a direct parallel between their beliefs and the course of history and the way they act in the modern day, yes it does
>You pointed out "two separate accounts," but provided no argument for their infallibility, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
It's never been my burden to prove they're infallible, the fact is they're the best source on the topic by far and to contradict them and say they're intentional lies requires actual evidence of intentional tampering with historical records which you don't have because otherwise you wouldn't be sending fucking google docs as a source for your info
1711770510368o.png
 
>Your assertion that "99% of Muslims who believe it make it so" is, in itself, a logical ERROR, CUCKOLD. Simply because widespread belief comes from the followers of a religion doesn't provide evidence for the truth of their beliefs WHATSOEVER KEK.
When I can draw a direct parallel between their beliefs and the course of history and the way they act in the modern day, yes it does
>You pointed out "two separate accounts," but provided no argument for their infallibility, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
It's never been my burden to prove they're infallible, the fact is they're the best source on the topic by far and to contradict them and say they're intentional lies requires actual evidence of intentional tampering with historical records which you don't have because otherwise you wouldn't be sending fucking google docs as a source for your info
View attachment 107496
What do you think on what I said on the matter?
 
no muslim who stays in their lands is an enemy of mine same goes with Africans and well really and non-white people group I don’t mind them when they stay in their native habitat I only take problem when they come into western nations with the help of Jews and globalists
Sounds like a meaningless virtue signal to me + you think arab mutts are white
 
Sounds like a meaningless virtue signal to me + you think arab mutts are white
Iranians are Persians not Arab also You think Irish people aren’t white also what you are doing is deflecting a Muslim Who stays in his land is fine as he poses no threat to Europe and has done nothing Wrong to it and he only wishes to stay in his native homeland
 
Iranians are Persians not Arab also You think Irish people aren’t white also what you are doing is deflecting a Muslim Who stays in his land is fine as he poses no threat to Europe and has done noth Wrong to it and he only wishes to stay in his native homeland
Even doe they are arab mutts also implying that whatever part isn't arab is white which obviously isn't true
You think Irish people aren’t white even Doe we are
Debatable
 
Even doe they are arab mutts also implying that whatever part isn't arab is white which obviously isn't true

Debatable
Not debatable Irish people are 100% White if not the most white what you say is debatable also Spanish and Portuguese and Italians have trace amounts of Arab dna just like Persians from Arab conquests from like 1000 years ago and they are still white
 
Even doe they are arab mutts also implying that whatever part isn't arab is white which obviously isn't true

Debatable
You just say “you think da Iranians are white” because you can’t debunk nor challenge any of my arguments you’ll just throw that in and not debate me
 
Sons of Ishmael
Jews are from Isaac Arabs are from Ismael both Isaac and Ismael were Sons of Abraham and both later on fathered the Arab and Jewish races (According to Abrahamic religious texts no other records nor historical or scientific records say this)
 
what are arabs a mix of?
They are mixed with arab dna IDK what arabs are it doesn't matter
Not debatable Irish people are 100% White if not the most white what you say is debatable also Spanish and Portuguese and Italians have trace amounts of Arab dna just like Persians from Arab conquests from like 1000 years ago and they are still white
They are like slavs, having light tone skin doesn't make you white that's fantasy
People want to call themselves white because whiteness is associated with intelligence, science, technological development, yet all of that happened exclusively within the range of england, france, germany, the netherlands, america (anglo america), and to a lesser extent scotland and italy
That's why the only people that are white are english, french, germans, dutch, the aforementioned in america, and to a lesser extent italians and scottish
That's literally as simple as it is, any other meaning of white than that is meaningless drivel regurgitated by aryanists larpers
 
Back
Top