Shit EVERYBODY Cares About! Total Muslim Death

[Meliton Manzanas]

They are mixed with arab dna IDK what arabs are it doesn't matter

They are like slavs, having light tone skin doesn't make you white that's fantasy
People want to call themselves white because whiteness is associated with intelligence, science, technological development, yet all of that happened exclusively within the range of england, france, germany, the netherlands, america (anglo america), and to a lesser extent scotland and italy
That's why the only people that are white are english, french, germans, dutch, the aforementioned in america, and to a lesser extent italians and scottish
That's literally as simple as it is, any other meaning of white than that is meaningless drivel regurgitated by aryanists larpers

The definition of being white is having white skin which white skin is literally fair skin tones Ask anyone this on the street

 

[sneedseedandfeed]

test

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

They are mixed with arab dna IDK what arabs are it doesn't matter

They are like slavs, having light tone skin doesn't make you white that's fantasy
People want to call themselves white because whiteness is associated with intelligence, science, technological development, yet all of that happened exclusively within the range of england, france, germany, the netherlands, america (anglo america), and to a lesser extent scotland and italy
That's why the only people that are white are english, french, germans, dutch, the aforementioned in america, and to a lesser extent italians and scottish
That's literally as simple as it is, any other meaning of white than that is meaningless drivel regurgitated by aryanists larpers

Arabs and Jews are the same practically what they are is Semitic which is its own thing

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

The definition of being white is having white skin which white skin is literally fair skin tones Ask anyone this on the street

Wrong, "white" just meant "lightish skin" then it would have been russia or poland that had a quarter of the world's landmass and population under it's dominion

 

[obsessed venusian]

Moved award

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

Wrong, "white" just meant "lightish skin" then it would have been russia or poland that had a quarter of the world's landmass and population under it's dominion

What do you mean by this both of those countries are literally white

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

Arabs and Jews are the same practically what they are is Semitic which is its own thing

Depends what jews, ashkenazis have majority german admixture but that's not the majority of israeli jews
You can't just use the accomplishments of actual white people (ethnic english, germans, french) and retroactively go back in time to draw some kind of arbitrary kinship between english people and fucking iranians who were spending 2000 year fucking goats in the mountains

 

[Warrior-Z]

>Your assertion that "99% of Muslims who believe it make it so" is, in itself, a logical ERROR, CUCKOLD. Simply because widespread belief comes from the followers of a religion doesn't provide evidence for the truth of their beliefs WHATSOEVER KEK.
When I can draw a direct parallel between their beliefs and the course of history and the way they act in the modern day, yes it does
>You pointed out "two separate accounts," but provided no argument for their infallibility, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
It's never been my burden to prove they're infallible, the fact is they're the best source on the topic by far and to contradict them and say they're intentional lies requires actual evidence of intentional tampering with historical records which you don't have because otherwise you wouldn't be sending fucking google docs as a source for your info

The act of considering a belief and its effect upon history cannot be used to support that belief. In the same line of reasoning, geocentrism would still be true, as it kept influencing thought throughout history. That is something, however, that only influences it does not make it true.Also, to deny a witness doesn't necessitate showing that his testimony is purposefully untrue; rather, it entails producing reasonable alternative interpretations. Ibn Jareer al-Tabari produced one such evidence. This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias. You demand evidence, yet all you can do is dismiss it uncritically. Scholarship is born of critical thinking and analysis, not that of a blind acceptance of the "best source." Address the evidence and not sidestep it. Holy crap you actually suck AT DEBATING and the FACT you dont even address the full thing shows how pathetic you are.
@Anon_Humor @doedoedoedoedoedoedoedoe @obsessed venusian @Xiuhcoyotl @Yes Do you guys see this Jew advocate?

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

The act of considering a belief and its effect upon history cannot be used to support that belief. In the same line of reasoning, geocentrism would still be true, as it kept influencing thought throughout history. That is something, however, that only influences it does not make it true.Also, to deny a witness doesn't necessitate showing that his testimony is purposefully untrue; rather, it entails producing reasonable alternative interpretations. Ibn Jareer al-Tabari produced one such evidence. This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias. You demand evidence, yet all you can do is dismiss it uncritically. Scholarship is born of critical thinking and analysis, not that of a blind acceptance of the "best source." Address the evidence and not sidestep it. Holy crap you actually suck AT DEBATING and the FACT you dont even address the full thing shows how pathetic you are.
@Anon_Humor @doedoedoedoedoedoedoedoe @obsessed venusian @Xiuhcoyotl @Yes Do you guys see this Jew advocate?

idc abt jews

 

[8doe]

The act of considering a belief and its effect upon history cannot be used to support that belief. In the same line of reasoning, geocentrism would still be true, as it kept influencing thought throughout history. That is something, however, that only influences it does not make it true.Also, to deny a witness doesn't necessitate showing that his testimony is purposefully untrue; rather, it entails producing reasonable alternative interpretations. Ibn Jareer al-Tabari produced one such evidence. This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias. You demand evidence, yet all you can do is dismiss it uncritically. Scholarship is born of critical thinking and analysis, not that of a blind acceptance of the "best source." Address the evidence and not sidestep it. Holy crap you actually suck AT DEBATING and the FACT you dont even address the full thing shows how pathetic you are.
@Anon_Humor @doedoedoedoedoedoedoedoe @obsessed venusian @Xiuhcoyotl @Yes Do you guys see this Jew advocate?

Genuine absurdity

 

[terrycrews]

The act of considering a belief and its effect upon history cannot be used to support that belief. In the same line of reasoning, geocentrism would still be true, as it kept influencing thought throughout history. That is something, however, that only influences it does not make it true.Also, to deny a witness doesn't necessitate showing that his testimony is purposefully untrue; rather, it entails producing reasonable alternative interpretations. Ibn Jareer al-Tabari produced one such evidence. This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias. You demand evidence, yet all you can do is dismiss it uncritically. Scholarship is born of critical thinking and analysis, not that of a blind acceptance of the "best source." Address the evidence and not sidestep it. Holy crap you actually suck AT DEBATING and the FACT you dont even address the full thing shows how pathetic you are.
@Anon_Humor @doedoedoedoedoedoedoedoe @obsessed venusian @Xiuhcoyotl @Yes Do you guys see this Jew advocate?

Dude my best friend is a Jew

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

The act of considering a belief and its effect upon history cannot be used to support that belief. In the same line of reasoning, geocentrism would still be true, as it kept influencing thought throughout history. That is something, however, that only influences it does not make it true.Also, to deny a witness doesn't necessitate showing that his testimony is purposefully untrue; rather, it entails producing reasonable alternative interpretations. Ibn Jareer al-Tabari produced one such evidence. This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias. You demand evidence, yet all you can do is dismiss it uncritically. Scholarship is born of critical thinking and analysis, not that of a blind acceptance of the "best source." Address the evidence and not sidestep it. Holy crap you actually suck AT DEBATING and the FACT you dont even address the full thing shows how pathetic you are.
@Anon_Humor @doedoedoedoedoedoedoedoe @obsessed venusian @Xiuhcoyotl @Yes Do you guys see this Jew advocate?

>This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias.
If you had evidence of intentional tampering with historical records in BOTH of these SEPERATE accounts that agree with eachother then you would be citing it from a historical journal, not pasting a google doc with bible maths in it.
Stop grasping at straws, end fuckin of

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

Depends what jews, ashkenazis have majority german admixture but that's not the majority of israeli jews
You can't just use the accomplishments of actual white people (ethnic english, germans, french) and retroactively go back in time to draw some kind of arbitrary kinship between english people and fucking iranians who were spending 2000 year fucking goats in the mountains

Iranians are literally Aryans and have fair skin also Irish people are white which you disagree on and also you’re definition of white is being advanced Iberians, Italians, Arabs, Jews, Egyptians, Ethiopians, Nubians, Literally were the first advanced civilized peoples with empires and inventions while the germanics in Europe were literally still in the Stone Age and early Iron Age and living in tents or caves

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

The act of considering a belief and its effect upon history cannot be used to support that belief. In the same line of reasoning, geocentrism would still be true, as it kept influencing thought throughout history. That is something, however, that only influences it does not make it true.Also, to deny a witness doesn't necessitate showing that his testimony is purposefully untrue; rather, it entails producing reasonable alternative interpretations. Ibn Jareer al-Tabari produced one such evidence. This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias. You demand evidence, yet all you can do is dismiss it uncritically. Scholarship is born of critical thinking and analysis, not that of a blind acceptance of the "best source." Address the evidence and not sidestep it. Holy crap you actually suck AT DEBATING and the FACT you dont even address the full thing shows how pathetic you are.
@Anon_Humor @doedoedoedoedoedoedoedoe @obsessed venusian @Xiuhcoyotl @Yes Do you guys see this Jew advocate?

yes everyone knows hes a kike shill already nothing new here

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

Iranians are literally Aryans and have fair skin also Irish people are white which you disagree on and also you’re definition of white is being advanced Iberians, Italians, Arabs, Jews, Egyptians, Ethiopians, Nubians, Literally were the first advanced civilized peoples with empires and inventions while the germanics in Europe were literally still in the Stone Age and early Iron Age and living in tents or caves

>Iranians are literally Aryans
Meaningless term, it wasn't "aryans" that pioneered the industrial revolution
>also you’re definition of white is being advanced Iberians, Italians, Arabs, Jews, Egyptians, Ethiopians, Nubians, Literally were the first advanced civilized peoples with empires
Random empires from the jungle bin soup of ancient history isn't on the level of white invention from the 14th century onward

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

>This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias.
If you had evidence of intentional tampering with historical records in BOTH of these SEPERATE accounts that agree with eachother then you would be citing it from a historical journal, not pasting a google doc with bible maths in it.
Stop grasping at straws, end fuckin of

i think I saw you in the election thread on /dem/ saying something about me being a muzzie and voting for cobsontalks was that you? Also do you post pro Israel content on pol and also post ”hamas_imnotevengonnasaythis.mp4” aswell? Confirm this or deny this I’m just suspicious and think you are the same

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

>Iranians are literally Aryans
Meaningless term, it wasn't "aryans" that pioneered the industrial revolution
>also you’re definition of white is being advanced Iberians, Italians, Arabs, Jews, Egyptians, Ethiopians, Nubians, Literally were the first advanced civilized peoples with empires
Random empires from the jungle bin soup of ancient history isn't on the level of white invention from the 14th century onward

Iberians (I.e. Spanish and Portugues) Literally made modern white civilization that we see today

 

[sneedseedandfeed]

i think I saw you in the election thread on /dem/ saying something about me being a muzzie and voting for cobsontalks was that you? Also do you post pro Israel content on pol and also post ”hamas_imnotevengonnasaythis.mp4” aswell? Confirm this or deny this I’m just suspicious and think you are the same

Iranians are literally Aryans and have fair skin also Irish people are white which you disagree on and also you’re definition of white is being advanced Iberians, Italians, Arabs, Jews, Egyptians, Ethiopians, Nubians, Literally were the first advanced civilized peoples with empires and inventions while the germanics in Europe were literally still in the Stone Age and early Iron Age and living in tents or caves

>This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias.
If you had evidence of intentional tampering with historical records in BOTH of these SEPERATE accounts that agree with eachother then you would be citing it from a historical journal, not pasting a google doc with bible maths in it.
Stop grasping at straws, end fuckin of

The act of considering a belief and its effect upon history cannot be used to support that belief. In the same line of reasoning, geocentrism would still be true, as it kept influencing thought throughout history. That is something, however, that only influences it does not make it true.Also, to deny a witness doesn't necessitate showing that his testimony is purposefully untrue; rather, it entails producing reasonable alternative interpretations. Ibn Jareer al-Tabari produced one such evidence. This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias. You demand evidence, yet all you can do is dismiss it uncritically. Scholarship is born of critical thinking and analysis, not that of a blind acceptance of the "best source." Address the evidence and not sidestep it. Holy crap you actually suck AT DEBATING and the FACT you dont even address the full thing shows how pathetic you are.
@Anon_Humor @doedoedoedoedoedoedoedoe @obsessed venusian @Xiuhcoyotl @Yes Do you guys see this Jew advocate?

holy shit no ones ever reading these messages just kys this is really sad

 

[Warrior-Z]

>This is no "Google Docs"; it's a historically regarded Islamic historian. To ignore Ibn Jareer al-Tabari while demanding infallibility from alternate accounts is but slanted bias.
If you had evidence of intentional tampering with historical records in BOTH of these SEPERATE accounts that agree with eachother then you would be citing it from a historical journal, not pasting a google doc with bible maths in it.
Stop grasping at straws, end fuckin of

Intentional tampering? History isn’t black-and-white, dumbass, there's going to be conflicting sources and interpretations. You cling to two accounts like they’re the holy grail, but guess what? That’s not how historical analysis works. Ibn Jareer al-Tabari is a historical source that is respected in Islamic historiography, not "a goggle doc concocted in a basement of mine." Crack a book instead of cracking stupid jokes. You dismiss actual sources because they don’t fit your narrative. That’s called intellectual laziness, bitch. You can’t be shouting “best source!” while you’re ignoring anything that might contradict it. And this "Bible math" nonsense? Retard, the chronology is reasoned and supported by accurate historical data, such as Abd al-Rahman’s age. This must be math in the real sense since it will really knock the wings off you, you would rather work with generalized theories rather than stick to facts.
Come back when you learn what debating even is.

 

[terrycrews]

All of this to avoid the fact I have the biggest penis in this thread