Shit EVERYBODY Cares About! Total Muslim Death

[Warrior-Z]

Editing my quote fallacy

Prove that's a real fallacy.

 

[terrycrews]

Prove that's a real fallacy.

It's a straw man fallacy since you're misrepresenting my argument

 

[Warrior-Z]

It's a straw man fallacy since you're misrepresenting my argument

Prove that's an argument and not a claim.

 

[terrycrews]

Prove that's an argument and not a claim.

You have yet to raise a counterpoint

 

[Warrior-Z]

You have yet to raise a counterpoint

How does that prove it's an argument wtf.

 

[Chimperator]

I hate mudslims.
View attachment 1719612188220f-0.jpg

 

[Warrior-Z]

And how do you know that

I 'oxxed him in a xitter thread and people called the feds on him for threatening a shooting.

 

[terrycrews]

How does that prove it's an argument wtf.

I mean how old are you

 

[Warrior-Z]

I mean how old are you

THAT'S NOT EVEN AN ARGUMENT WTF, THAT'S A QUESTION

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

I mean how old are you

17(nigga's an unc)

 

[Warrior-Z]

@terrycrews DUDE HOW DO YOU NOT KNOW WHAT AN ARGUMENT IS

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

Your argument is based MORE on fallacies than evidence. Saying, "99% of Muslims believe it" is argumentum ad populum due to the fact that truth is not determined by consensus, REETARD, but by evidence. Blurting out that the historical calculations of Ibn Jareer al-Tabari "Baptist Bible maths" is a straw man--because they are based on Islamic historiography, not external theology, dumbass. Also you committed a false dilemma. Islamic scholarship actually flourishes with rather diverse intellectual perspectives and capacity to reevaluate evidence. The age assigned for Aisha at marriage in this particular timeline, based on her brother's age, raises her possible marriage age to something like 18-19, really meant to be given serious consideration, not rhetorical dismissal. If you are going to respond emotionally, why not allude to the evidence instead? Your counter to the claim weakens each time it is exposed to logical scrutiny.
GET BTFO'D HAHAHAHAHA

>Saying, "99% of Muslims believe it" is argumentum ad populum due to the fact that truth is not determined by consensus, REETARD
WRONG you are incapable of understanding arguments because you don't want to understand arguments you like to shadowbox with strawmen so you don't have to confront reality
The argument that "99% of muzzies believe it" proves that IF this incredibly important fact about pisslam is a complete lie by some of their most important people and that everyone believes it and there being legislation in the modern day being justified by it, then pisslam is a SHIT religion and apprently the INFALLIBE PROPHET FOR ALL TIME didn't think it was IMPORTANT to say that PEDOPHILIA WAS BAD
>Blurting out that the historical calculations of Ibn Jareer al-Tabari "Baptist Bible maths" is a straw man--because they are based on Islamic historiography, not external theology, dumbass.
Actually I can disregard it because you're citing a literally who google doc to completely handwave all consensus on the topic because you're mad
All of your people's talking points hinge on diluting conversation with bible maths that you don't actually read or understand like the whataboutism with rebecca and joseph, citing random websites that don't even agree with your conclusion, all this to, again, COMPLETELY disregard TWO SEPERATE ACCOUNTS by TWO of the MOST CITED people as INTENTIONAL FABRICATIONS
"Bad faith" is an understatement

 

[terrycrews]

THAT'S NOT EVEN AN ARGUMENT WTF, THAT'S A QUESTION

I can't prove it to you if you're underage

17(nigga's an unc)

Then it'll remain a claim

 

[ukrainian_chad]

>Saying, "99% of Muslims believe it" is argumentum ad populum due to the fact that truth is not determined by consensus, REETARD
WRONG you are incapable of understanding arguments because you don't want to understand arguments you like to shadowbox with strawmen so you don't have to confront reality
The argument that "99% of muzzies believe it" proves that IF this incredibly important fact about pisslam is a complete lie by some of their most important people and that everyone believes it and there being legislation in the modern day being justified by it, then pisslam is a SHIT religion and apprently the INFALLIBE PROPHET FOR ALL TIME didn't think it was IMPORTANT to say that PEDOPHILIA WAS BAD
>Blurting out that the historical calculations of Ibn Jareer al-Tabari "Baptist Bible maths" is a straw man--because they are based on Islamic historiography, not external theology, dumbass.
Actually I can disregard it because you're citing a literally who google doc to completely handwave all consensus on the topic because you're mad
All of your people's talking points hinge on diluting conversation with bible maths that you don't actually read or understand like the whataboutism with rebecca and joseph, citing random websites that don't even agree with your conclusion, all this to, again, COMPLETELY disregard TWO SEPERATE ACCOUNTS by TWO of the MOST CITED people as INTENTIONAL FABRICATIONS
"Bad faith" is an understatement

not reading that

 

[Warrior-Z]

>Saying, "99% of Muslims believe it" is argumentum ad populum due to the fact that truth is not determined by consensus, REETARD
WRONG you are incapable of understanding arguments because you don't want to understand arguments you like to shadowbox with strawmen so you don't have to confront reality
The argument that "99% of muzzies believe it" proves that IF this incredibly important fact about pisslam is a complete lie by some of their most important people and that everyone believes it and there being legislation in the modern day being justified by it, then pisslam is a SHIT religion and apprently the INFALLIBE PROPHET FOR ALL TIME didn't think it was IMPORTANT to say that PEDOPHILIA WAS BAD
>Blurting out that the historical calculations of Ibn Jareer al-Tabari "Baptist Bible maths" is a straw man--because they are based on Islamic historiography, not external theology, dumbass.
Actually I can disregard it because you're citing a literally who google doc to completely handwave all consensus on the topic because you're mad
All of your people's talking points hinge on diluting conversation with bible maths that you don't actually read or understand like the whataboutism with rebecca and joseph, citing random websites that don't even agree with your conclusion, all this to, again, COMPLETELY disregard TWO SEPERATE ACCOUNTS by TWO of the MOST CITED people as INTENTIONAL FABRICATIONS
"Bad faith" is an understatement

Your assertion that "99% of Muslims who believe it make it so" is, in itself, a logical ERROR, CUCKOLD. Simply because widespread belief comes from the followers of a religion doesn't provide evidence for the truth of their beliefs WHATSOEVER KEK. Scholarship isn't some kind of popularity contest, retard, it's a search for evidence. To assume that since one historical detail is contested, Islam as a religion is "useless," is simply a different kind of logical error. Disputes over historical accounts shouldn't invalidate a religion any more than the question of some biblical figures belittles Christianity. Calling Ibn Jareer al-Tabari, a well-respected Islamic historian, “a book no one’s heard about” is ridiculous. Ibn Jareer became one of the most quoted figures in Islamic historiography, and your feeble attempt to brush aside his work displays ignorance, like the little bitch you are. You pointed out "two separate accounts," but provided no argument for their infallibility, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Historical narratives do not usually conform to a single story and cross-referencing alternate timelines as proposed here is standard scholarly practice. Not admitting to this shows that you are more concerned about dogma than dialogue. You keep alluding to "Bible maths" instead of dealing with the actual evidence: Abd al-Rahman's age at Badr provides a reasonable timeline for Aisha's marriage age to be closer to 18-19. This is not "madness", you think you're some kind of Spartan or what? It is a rational line of inquiry.

Then it'll remain a claim

Wtf? This weirdo sends his dick to random men?

 

[terrycrews]

Wtf? This weirdo sends his dick to random men?

Yeah why not

 

[Otto Skorzeny]

I don't like them

no muslim who stays in their lands is an enemy of mine same goes with Africans and well really and non-white people group I don’t mind them when they stay in their native habitat I only take problem when they come into western nations with the help of Jews and globalists

 

[terrycrews]

no muslim who stays in their lands is an enemy of mine same goes with Africans and well really and non-white people group I don’t mind them when they stay in their native habitat I only take problem when they come into western nations with the help of Jews and globalists

I like that

 

[Otto Skorzeny]

I like that

This is what I think on the matter and I will bring this up in debates on many topics and subjects

 

[9I99ER]

@Warrior-Z @XXX_SKIBIDISIGMA_XXX