Not that I hate 'toss or anything but he definitely missed big time here. Calling Rome "globalist" is like calling any imperialist empire globalist, which is retarded. So many empires throughout history tried conquering the world and all failed. I'm sure nobody here would even think about calling the third reich "globohomo" in fear that hitler's ghost will rape you at 3 am, but is it really that much different than rome conquering europe? The only difference between the two in this case is that one lasted almost 2000 years and the other lasted 12 years.
Not that I hate 'toss or anything but he definitely missed big time here. Calling Rome "globalist" is like calling any imperialist empire globalist, which is retarded. So many empires throughout history tried conquering the world and all failed. I'm sure nobody here would even think about calling the third reich "globohomo" in fear that hitler's ghost will rape you at 3 am, but is it really that much different than rome conquering europe? The only difference between the two in this case is that one lasted almost 2000 years and the other lasted 12 years.
Not that I hate 'toss or anything but he definitely missed big time here. Calling Rome "globalist" is like calling any imperialist empire globalist, which is retarded. So many empires throughout history tried conquering the world and all failed. I'm sure nobody here would even think about calling the third reich "globohomo" in fear that hitler's ghost will rape you at 3 am, but is it really that much different than rome conquering europe? The only difference between the two in this case is that one lasted almost 2000 years and the other lasted 12 years.
All global hegemons were globalist, especially Rome. The example of the Third Reich is actually a good one, because they, despite intense post-war propaganda from the Allies, really wanted to become a globalist empire. The Reich quickly went from the idea “Germany has been mistreated by everyone and must take revenge” to “We bring peace and freedom to the all races occupied by Jews and Freemasons”.
i don't think there's any country that could legitimately be called the "third rome," byzantium was only the "second rome" by virtue of being a direct successor state to the original, united imperivm romanvm (i.e. the "first rome")
An imperial heir: Recently, I have begun to love spending hours learning about the history of Rome. Within this past year, I have probably read half a dozen books about the Roman Empire, I have spent nights watching long documentaries and YouTube videos about the historical empire, and I have...