whats wrong with isolationism

π— π—žπ—–

Novus ordo seclorum, again.
GOLDEN GOD
Joined
Oct 28, 2024
Messages
5,847
i kinda remember my teachers talking about it in school like it was a bad thing when we were learning about WW1 & WW2.
almost every single political party these days always wants to get involved in wars (proxies count) or do some bullshit with "muh foreign relations"...
i dont understand why we can't just keep to ourselves and try to become more self reliant. getting involved in other countries' business has almost never gone well after ww2, especially with vietnam and afghanistan.
please explain to me what i'm not seeing...
>muh pearl harbor
apparently a lot of that had to do with US oil embargoes placed on japan... which sounds a little contradictory and not isolationist at all.
 
It threatens the interests of those who want to establish the world order of the Great Tribulation, so they, of course, don't like something that opposes their ambitions for the global dominance of evil.
 
It threatens the interests of those who want to establish the world order of the Great Tribulation, so they, of course, don't like something that opposes their ambitions for the global dominance of evil.
I'm not really well-versed on this stuff but I think I can understand what you meant after reading it a few times... it's hard to process even though I made this thread mostly as a way to get confirmation via a subject that most people would consider mundane upon first glance.
Very well. I keep trying to think of other explanations, but I can't come up with anything. I'm not sure why it strikes me as so shocking... oh well.
 
1731461572765.png
 
The United States, as the sole military and economic superpower, has the moral responsibility to stand up for freedom and democracy around the world. Don't like it? Move out.
 
Because the economy is global like it or not and if you like unrestricted internet and cheap shit you better hope it stays this way.
 
i kinda remember my teachers talking about it in school like it was a bad thing when we were learning about WW1 & WW2.
almost every single political party these days always wants to get involved in wars (proxies count) or do some bullshit with "muh foreign relations"...
i dont understand why we can't just keep to ourselves and try to become more self reliant. getting involved in other countries' business has almost never gone well after ww2, especially with vietnam and afghanistan.
please explain to me what i'm not seeing...
>muh pearl harbor
apparently a lot of that had to do with US oil embargoes placed on japan... which sounds a little contradictory and not isolationist at all.
Ukraine would le die or someburger idk
 
The only people against isolationisim are war mongerers
Never have i ever seen anyone ever argue against isolationisim that didn't change the subject to how we "ought to nuke those darned Russians"
 
Isolationism is bad for the economy.
 
Isolationism is bad for the economy.
>yes goy move all your strategical industrial assets outside your borders and always be at the economic mercy of foregin powers
 
>yes goy move all your strategical industrial assets outside your borders and always be at the economic mercy of foregin powers
Am I wrong?
 
Isolationism le good because Japan did that and japan is sugoi
Isolationism even doe AMERIKKKA came and forced them to do something idk, even though annexation of Korea, even though invasion of China. Is that also sugoi?
 
Back
Top