• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

What do you think of Homosexuals?

Post thread
Despite being a fraction of the population, fags are majority of the pedophiles.
source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3070603/
source 2: https://lanternproject.org.uk/libra...-impact/homosexuality-and-child-sexual-abuse/
source 3: http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/child-molestation-and-homosexuality-2/
source 4: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00856862
source 5: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/abn0000212
source 6: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-22683-001
source 7: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0145213495000173
source 8: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9587795/
Fags are up to 109 times as likely to have an STD compared to heterosexuals + Fags are 67 times more likely to have HIV
Source: https://archive.ph/hPY6F
Fags 17x more likely to have anal cancer
source: https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
52% of fags report sexual abuse
source: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-l...lesbian-relationships-descriptives-and-gender
LGBT have 44.1% chance to be molested in childhood
source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15982145/
only 20% of trannies pass.
source: https://web.archive.org/web/2018050...ads/reports/reports/ntds_report_on_health.pdf
Almost 80% of American dykes were sexually abused
source: https://archive.ph/wip/2AWkp
Children who's parents are divorced more likely to be fags
https://archive.ph/P4EEe
Fags and trannies more likely to be turbo-gooners
source: https://archive.ph/DKRS0
Fags and trannies more likely to be narcissistic, and have self-centered personalities
source: https://archive.ph/uSx5J
source 2: http://www.annelawrence.com/shame_&_narcissistic_rage.pdf
 

Attachments

  • dem.png
    dem.png
    51 KB · Views: 11
Pepsilord said:
Speaking seriously, sexually deviant thoughts and desires do not define who or what you are.

They are just that, deviations. As long as you do not engage with them or humor them they have no bearing on your self.

A great tragedy of modern times is the belief that any errant, deviant thought you may have is truly part of you, truly defines who and what you are, when that is quite simply not the case.

I pity those who have been convinced that base desires define oneself, and have ruined themselves in trying to bring that "true self" into reality.
Click to expand...
being gay is not being sexually deviant
 
Golden said:
Despite being a fraction of the population, fags are majority of the pedophiles.
source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3070603/
source 2: https://lanternproject.org.uk/libra...-impact/homosexuality-and-child-sexual-abuse/
source 3: http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/child-molestation-and-homosexuality-2/
source 4: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00856862
source 5: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/abn0000212
source 6: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-22683-001
source 7: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0145213495000173
source 8: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9587795/
Fags are up to 109 times as likely to have an STD compared to heterosexuals + Fags are 67 times more likely to have HIV
Source: https://archive.ph/hPY6F
Fags 17x more likely to have anal cancer
source: https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
52% of fags report sexual abuse
source: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-l...lesbian-relationships-descriptives-and-gender
LGBT have 44.1% chance to be molested in childhood
source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15982145/
only 20% of trannies pass.
source: https://web.archive.org/web/2018050...ads/reports/reports/ntds_report_on_health.pdf
Almost 80% of American dykes were sexually abused
source: https://archive.ph/wip/2AWkp
Children who's parents are divorced more likely to be fags
https://archive.ph/P4EEe
Fags and trannies more likely to be turbo-gooners
source: https://archive.ph/DKRS0
Fags and trannies more likely to be narcissistic, and have self-centered personalities
source: https://archive.ph/uSx5J
source 2: http://www.annelawrence.com/shame_&_narcissistic_rage.pdf
Click to expand...
Nobody is responding to this shit because it‘s defamatory garbage. For example, your second source if from the "Family Research Institute" which blatantly states in its about page that it conducts "research" with the goal of discrediting queer people. That’s not how science works. You don’t research with a predetermined conclusion. Then you have pages that are literally just SNCA blogs people wrote, how are those sources?
Also with the pedophilia, it has been established for a long time that men attracted to male children have no correlation to men attracted to male adults. They are basically two different sexualities. You are intentionally conflating the two to paint gays as pedophiles.

Your homophobic beliefs will never be supported by science because they are fundamentally based on irrational hate and misconceptions. Spamming random articles will not change that.
 
SmallAnus said:
You just said it's all wrong without even disputing the facts. So what it came from some shit called "Family Research Institute"? It doesn't cease to be true when it came from a source you don't like
Click to expand...
If it’s not a credible source then it‘s not worth discussing. This "institute" (Zero affiliation with actual academia I can find) is blatantly partial to this topic.
You don’t consider non-credible sources, period. That is how the scientific method works.
 
Cobbert said:
If it’s not a credible source then it‘s not worth discussing. This "institute" (Zero affiliation with actual academia I can find) is blatantly partial to this topic.
You don’t consider non-credible sources, period. That is how the scientific method works.
Click to expand...
It’s non credible… because it just is, ok?!
 
Pepsilord said:
It’s non credible… because it just is, ok?!
Click to expand...
I don't know why I need to explain to you why a random website that is transparently trying to push an agenda is not credible. Especially when the agenda goes against an academic consensus that has existed for decades.
You wouldn't give these literal who sites half the benefit of the doubt if it wasn't an LGBT-related topic. The only reason you trust them more is because you want "sources" that support your predetermined conclusion of gays being evil.
Truth will never be on your side.
 
Cobbert said:
I don't know why I need to explain to you why a random website that is transparently trying to push an agenda is not credible. Especially when the agenda goes against an academic consensus that has existed for decades.
You wouldn't give these literal who sites half the benefit of the doubt if it wasn't an LGBT-related topic. The only reason you trust them more is because you want "sources" that support your predetermined conclusion of gays being evil.
Truth will never be on your side.
Click to expand...
I have all of human history backing me up. The current moral views will be seen as abhorrent and evil in the future. Go outside of the west and it’s already seen like that. It is you who's views lie outside of the truth.
 
Pepsilord said:
I have all of human history backing me up. The current moral views will be seen as abhorrent and evil in the future. Go outside of the west and it’s already seen like that. It is you who's views lie outside of the truth.
Click to expand...
What a retarded argument. People back then believed the sun revolved around earth, does that mean it has to be true?
And there are plenty of historical examples of homo- and transsexuality (And no, most of them don't involve pederasty). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_homosexuality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_history
 
Back
Top