Yes and I am winning since I can give anyone I want LLLLZZZZ.You niggas are still fighting
You have 1. I am warning you RN.what about me?
![]()
You only posted one as apart of the same article, which says that it isn't indisputable.Although I still posted multiple arguments and multiple quotes so that does not disapprove what I said whatsoever.
>It's not proof because I said soNo, it’s not proof because I’m already refusing what you’re saying.
It's literally in the Sahih Al-Bukhari. Even Aisha herself multiple times narrated that Muhammad said that picture-makers would be punished on the Day of Resurrection.You can go ahead and prove that. That he himself stated it.
Sahih al-Bukhari 5957I purchased a cushion with pictures on it. The Prophet (came and) stood at the door but did not enter. I said (to him), "I repent to Allah for what (the guilt) I have done." He said, "What is this cushion?" I said, "It is for you to sit on and recline on." He said, "The makers of these pictures will be punished on the Day of Resurrection and it will be said to them, 'Make alive what you have created.' Moreover, the angels do not enter a house where there are pictures.'"
for what doe? I haven't done anything wrong...yet.You have 1. I am warning you RN.
are you esl? You start "debates" in random threads andderail them then leak all over the place until the thread gets sent to /dump/ I'm telling you to make a megathread maybe in /incel/ so you stop shitting up threadsNo, I’m definitely talking to you
Idk actually, i thought it'd be funny.for what doe? I haven't done anything wrong...yet.
brainwashed tooYou can say I’m brain-dead,
they haveeven though none of these people in this thread have ever won a single conversation against me.
>you were hecking mean to me therefore i es winnerYou can sit there and be racist and Islamophobic all you want, that just gives me the moral authority and any debater who would read the thread would know that I won.
This is true. Also baiting is irresistible because that fucking retard will always reply.are you esl? You start "debates" in random threads andderail them then leak all over the place until the thread gets sent to /dump/ I'm telling you to make a megathread maybe in /incel/ so you stop shitting up threads
Your take on this hadith is cherry-picked, you dumbass. Sure, Sahih al-Bukhari mentions a punishment for picture makers, but don't delude yourself into thinking that wide range of scholars from Malikis to Salafis to Hanbalis like Ibn Hamdan haven't long argued that the hadith is prohibiting only a full statue casting a shadow, not any image. It is the circumstance and intention that matters, as long as the art does not stray into being idolatrous, is not immoral, or obsessive, it can be okay. Also, I never said, "it's no proof because I said so", I said that I refuted what you have used as evidence so you have no proof now kek.You only posted one as apart of the same article, which says that it isn't indisputable.
>It's not proof because I said so
It boggles my mind on how you're THIS retarded
It's literally in the Sahih Al-Bukhari. Even Aisha herself multiple times narrated that Muhammad said that picture-makers would be punished on the Day of Resurrection.
Sahih al-Bukhari 5957
Book 77, Hadith 173
Justify that.brainwashed too
Justify that.they have
Strawman fallacy.>you were hecking mean to me therefore i es winner
First of all, what I said has nothing to do with English being a second language to people or the concept itself. The thing is that I never derailed the thread you guys came in talking about me of course I’m going to talk back. I am not gonna sit there and kiss anyone’s ass. I’m going to keep smashing your heads in as long as you keep talking piss.are you esl? You start "debates" in random threads andderail them then leak all over the place until the thread gets sent to /dump/ I'm telling you to make a megathread maybe in /incel/ so you stop shitting up threads
Technicality-ZYour take on this hadith is cherry-picked, you dumbass. Sure, Sahih al-Bukhari mentions a punishment for picture makers, but don't delude yourself into thinking that wide range of scholars from Malikis to Salafis to Hanbalis like Ibn Hamdan haven't long argued that the hadith is prohibiting only a full statue casting a shadow, not any image. It is the circumstance and intention that matters, as long as the art does not stray into being idolatrous, is not immoral, or obsessive, it can be okay. Also, I never said, "it's no proof because I said so", I said that I refuted what you have used as evidence so you have no proof now kek.
Why does Aisha herself narrate otherwise then?Your take on this hadith is cherry-picked, you dumbass. Sure, Sahih al-Bukhari mentions a punishment for picture makers, but don't delude yourself into thinking that wide range of scholars from Malikis to Salafis to Hanbalis like Ibn Hamdan haven't long argued that the hadith is prohibiting only a full statue casting a shadow, not any image.
Warrior-gegbullFirst of all, what I said has nothing to do with English being a second language to people or the concept itself. The thing is that I never derailed the thread you guys came in talking about me of course I’m going to talk back. I am not gonna sit there and kiss anyone’s ass. I’m going to keep smashing your heads in as long as you keep talking piss.
Detransition.First of all, what I said has nothing to do with English being a second language to people or the concept itself. The thing is that I never derailed the thread you guys came in talking about me of course I’m going to talk back. I am not gonna sit there and kiss anyone’s ass. I’m going to keep smashing your heads in as long as you keep talking piss.
Nice auto concession. You can think that, doesn’t make it true. I win ez.Warrior-gegbull
That’s the preposition that you’re going to go ahead and try to substantiate.Why does Aisha herself narrate otherwise then?