• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

VOTE! The REAL Thrembo....

Who Is The Real Thrembo?

  • ThremboSchlog (me, Warrior-Z's fourth very white wife and legal slave. Descendant of Adolf Hitler)

    Votes: 6 11.5%
  • Thrembo88 (Ϫ Whitest option Ϫ)

    Votes: 17 32.7%
  • thrembolone (valid turkroachxista 🏳️‍⚧️🇹🇷🪳)

    Votes: 15 28.8%
  • Thrembo (LITERAL PEDOPHILE)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6ixthrembo

    Votes: 7 13.5%
  • JOON TROON KIKES ARE FAGGOTS I DID NOT ADD THAT FIRST OPTION, JANNIES REVERSE THAT KIKE

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • condolana

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • https://blog.soyjak.st/attachments/c7e27d734b4d29fb55e651d6e5b9b5366e56b858_hq-jpg.172731/

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • Jannies are faggots I never added the extra shit in the top response they're just being obsessed

    Votes: 1 1.9%

  • Total voters
    52
Although I still posted multiple arguments and multiple quotes so that does not disapprove what I said whatsoever.
You only posted one as apart of the same article, which says that it isn't indisputable.
No, it’s not proof because I’m already refusing what you’re saying.
>It's not proof because I said so
It boggles my mind on how you're THIS retarded
You can go ahead and prove that. That he himself stated it.
It's literally in the Sahih Al-Bukhari. Even Aisha herself multiple times narrated that Muhammad said that picture-makers would be punished on the Day of Resurrection.


I purchased a cushion with pictures on it. The Prophet (came and) stood at the door but did not enter. I said (to him), "I repent to Allah for what (the guilt) I have done." He said, "What is this cushion?" I said, "It is for you to sit on and recline on." He said, "The makers of these pictures will be punished on the Day of Resurrection and it will be said to them, 'Make alive what you have created.' Moreover, the angels do not enter a house where there are pictures.'"
Sahih al-Bukhari 5957
Book 77, Hadith 173
 
1743298566575.jpeg

...ø·ø ̈ùšù„ø© ... ø£øoù†ùšø© ù„ù„ø£ø·ù ø§ù„ ... ù„ùšø ̈ùšø§
 
are you esl? You start "debates" in random threads andderail them then leak all over the place until the thread gets sent to /dump/ I'm telling you to make a megathread maybe in /incel/ so you stop shitting up threads
This is true. Also baiting is irresistible because that fucking retard will always reply.
 
You only posted one as apart of the same article, which says that it isn't indisputable.

>It's not proof because I said so
It boggles my mind on how you're THIS retarded

It's literally in the Sahih Al-Bukhari. Even Aisha herself multiple times narrated that Muhammad said that picture-makers would be punished on the Day of Resurrection.



Sahih al-Bukhari 5957
Book 77, Hadith 173
Your take on this hadith is cherry-picked, you dumbass. Sure, Sahih al-Bukhari mentions a punishment for picture makers, but don't delude yourself into thinking that wide range of scholars from Malikis to Salafis to Hanbalis like Ibn Hamdan haven't long argued that the hadith is prohibiting only a full statue casting a shadow, not any image. It is the circumstance and intention that matters, as long as the art does not stray into being idolatrous, is not immoral, or obsessive, it can be okay. Also, I never said, "it's no proof because I said so", I said that I refuted what you have used as evidence so you have no proof now kek.
 
are you esl? You start "debates" in random threads andderail them then leak all over the place until the thread gets sent to /dump/ I'm telling you to make a megathread maybe in /incel/ so you stop shitting up threads
First of all, what I said has nothing to do with English being a second language to people or the concept itself. The thing is that I never derailed the thread you guys came in talking about me of course I’m going to talk back. I am not gonna sit there and kiss anyone’s ass. I’m going to keep smashing your heads in as long as you keep talking piss.
 
Your take on this hadith is cherry-picked, you dumbass. Sure, Sahih al-Bukhari mentions a punishment for picture makers, but don't delude yourself into thinking that wide range of scholars from Malikis to Salafis to Hanbalis like Ibn Hamdan haven't long argued that the hadith is prohibiting only a full statue casting a shadow, not any image. It is the circumstance and intention that matters, as long as the art does not stray into being idolatrous, is not immoral, or obsessive, it can be okay. Also, I never said, "it's no proof because I said so", I said that I refuted what you have used as evidence so you have no proof now kek.
Technicality-Z
 
Your take on this hadith is cherry-picked, you dumbass. Sure, Sahih al-Bukhari mentions a punishment for picture makers, but don't delude yourself into thinking that wide range of scholars from Malikis to Salafis to Hanbalis like Ibn Hamdan haven't long argued that the hadith is prohibiting only a full statue casting a shadow, not any image.
Why does Aisha herself narrate otherwise then?
 
First of all, what I said has nothing to do with English being a second language to people or the concept itself. The thing is that I never derailed the thread you guys came in talking about me of course I’m going to talk back. I am not gonna sit there and kiss anyone’s ass. I’m going to keep smashing your heads in as long as you keep talking piss.
Warrior-gegbull
 
First of all, what I said has nothing to do with English being a second language to people or the concept itself. The thing is that I never derailed the thread you guys came in talking about me of course I’m going to talk back. I am not gonna sit there and kiss anyone’s ass. I’m going to keep smashing your heads in as long as you keep talking piss.
Detransition.
 
Back
Top