• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

lil bro sent me an ip logger

I dont think the data server and brapsil's ip are on the same port
+ if i use grabify's ip lookup tool it does show that IP being in London
1724335383642.png

,
 
clearly you don't. be quiet and listen to soiboi
so if i host a minecraft server on 157.173.211.143:25565 and 157.173.211.143:25565 will i get the exact same server or 2 different results?
its the same ip address. two networks can't have the same ip address.
only 1 network can have that ip address, it can host diff servers on diff ports like 157.173.211.143:25566 but not on the same port on the same ip

assuming all ips go up to 9, thats 999.999.999.999, 999 to the power of 4 is literally 996,005,996,001 unique ips that change dynamically over time. we're not going to run out of ips any time soon, so the answer to all of your retardation is no, you can't have the exact same fucking public ip as another person, that is not possible.

another thing, if basil's ip is showing up as a hostinger database on 99% of other sites except grabify then it's probably because grabify was wrong or another service accessed the ip first or masked basil's ip somehow.
 
yeah

you are retarded
ips can't co-exist on different ports
if i go to 157.173.211.143:80 and 157.173.211.143:80 i WILL get the same result. because they are the SAME IP.
what you're saying sounds almost as if you can host a server on a port on a port or something
so i can connect to 157.173.211.143:80 and 157.173.211.143:80 and get 2 different results somehow (even doe that is impossible)
yet it gives you no ISP details.
the grabify link was incorrect, whois and 99% of other lookup tools show a datacenter in massejewsets, hostinger to be exact.
you're forgetting the existence of CGNAT and public ip sharing. That could also explain the absence of ISP details
 
>same port
you just can't fix retardation, can you
its the same port because it's the exact same network
what you are hypothesizing is two different networks with the same ip, correct?
so that's 157.173.211.143 (Blue) and 157.173.211.143 (Red)

They somehow have the same IP, so let's do an experiment. If you ping the IP addresses, what will happen? Will you ping 157.173.211.143 (Blue) or 157.173.211.143 (Red)?
If 157.173.211.143 (Blue) hosts a website on port 80, that IP will be 157.173.211.143:80 and you'll go to Blue's site, but what happens if Red is also hosting a site on the same port?
Do you end up on blue's site, or red's site? is it random? Or do you get on no site at all?
 
its the same port because it's the exact same network
what you are hypothesizing is two different networks with the same ip, correct?
so that's 157.173.211.143 (Blue) and 157.173.211.143 (Red)

They somehow have the same IP, so let's do an experiment. If you ping the IP addresses, what will happen? Will you ping 157.173.211.143 (Blue) or 157.173.211.143 (Red)?
If 157.173.211.143 (Blue) hosts a website on port 80, that IP will be 157.173.211.143:80 and you'll go to Blue's site, but what happens if Red is also hosting a site on the same port?
Do you end up on blue's site, or red's site? is it random? Or do you get on no site at all?
what color is my ip address
 
>if you connect to the same port you will get the same result
GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEG SO RETARDED
Even though that's exactly what happens? If you host 2 servers on the exact same IP address with the exact same port, you get the same result.
The results differ if you use different ports but because the default port for a website is port 80, if 2 networks with identical IPs try to host on the exact same IP address, what happens?
Hagon does ask an interesting question which seems to suggest that the colour of YOUR IP address might be different based on where you are in the world, which would suggest that if you lvie in america, your ip might be Red and therefore, you connect to 157.173.211.143 (Red) and get Red's site, but as a Brit, I might get 157.173.211.143 (Blue) and get Blue's site.

Let's test this hypothesis. By doing this, we expect that basil lives in the United Kingdom. As a resident myself, I'm going to traceroute his IP and see where it goes.
As I am a UK citizen and I have tracerouted his IP, the traceroute goes from my IP address to a datacenter in the UK and eventually ends up at the HOSTINGER IP.
This means that the IP is infact the HOSTINGER database. So, if I am Blue and Basil is Blue, how come his IP is not a UK IP for me? A fellow blue?

Doesn't that suggest that Basil is actually American?
This doesn't make sense, one possible explanation however is that when basil clicked on the link, it grabbed the wrong IP, which was masked by a datacenter, specifically Hostinger.
This makes sense because hosting companies have DDOS protection and yada yada so the domain for soyjak.blog masked basil's IP when he clicked on the link.
 
If you want a simple conclusion, you can go lookup the IP for yourself, or connect to it on a web browser, it brings you to a 403 forbidden page.
I doubt Basil is even hosting a server on port 80, let alone a 403 server, so the ip 157.173.211.143 does NOT belong to basil at all.
You have "London" vs a mountain of other evidence, so which do you trust?
 
"
Hagon does ask an interesting question which seems to suggest that the colour of YOUR IP address might be different based on where you are in the world, which would suggest that if you lvie in america, your ip might be Red and therefore, you connect to 157.173.211.143 (Red) and get Red's site, but as a Brit, I might get 157.173.211.143 (Blue) and get Blue's site.

Let's test this hypothesis."

Taken out of context award
 
Back
Top