I'm Voting RFK Jr.

Buchanansisters...
Buchanan was mistaken on this, clearly, as, in that article, which is on the topic of David Duke's NAAWP, Buchanan, in no terms immediately condemning Duke, simply shows his caution in supporting what could have been a very controversial organization (a racial supremacist organization), yet in reality, Duke's NAAWP was simply a nationalist activist organization made in response to the introduction of affirmative action discrimination against America's White population in that time. I still have a spot in my heart for Pat, however, in light of what meager errorful statements he may have made in those times. He's done great in advocating for true American interests, as has Duke.
 
Buchanan was mistaken on this, clearly, as, in that article, which is on the topic of David Duke's NAAWP, Buchanan, in no terms immediately condemning Duke, simply shows his caution in supporting what could have been a very controversial organization (a racial supremacist organization), yet in reality, Duke's NAAWP was simply a nationalist activist organization made in response to the introduction of affirmative action discrimination against America's White population in that time. I still have a spot in my heart for Pat, however, in light of what meager errorful statements he may have made in those times. He's done great in advocating for true American interests, as has Duke.
Fair, but I still like Paul more tho.
1000027496.jpg
 
>environmental lawyer for 40 years
>knows how to actually drain the swamp
>antivax
>classical liberal
>highest favorability
>biggest among young voters
>can form a coherent sentence
>wants to ban lobbying
>wants to regulate big pharma and food
>both sides currently seething over him

>inb4 muh wasted vote even though both candidates are shit


Will you be voting for him? If not, why not?
View attachment 5308
>Environmental Lawyer for 40 years
And this is a good thing how? Reminder: RFK Jr. supports imprisoning Global Warming Skeptics.
>Classical Liberal
No he isn't. He's always been farther left economically than any conservative
>Highest favorability/biggest among young voters
1. young voters are mentally retarded, 2. He's not gonna win no matter how hard you push it
>Wants to ban lobbying
He will fail
>Wants to regulate big pharma and food, anti-vax
ehh I guess this is okay. But Americans are mostly unhealthy because they're lazy and stupid and not because of the quality of food.

RFK is just an ordinary libtard who happens to be a vax-skeptic. That's the only issue he is "good" on. Also, the Kennedies suck.
 
>Environmental Lawyer for 40 years
And this is a good thing how?
Because against cases like DuPont, they were fucking poisoning the water and killing local agricultural business. In one of his suits against GE, they poisoned the Hudson river to a point at which the river caught on fire.
He wasn't talking about climate change deniers, he was talking about the Koch brothers.
>Classical Liberal
No he isn't. He's always been farther left economically than any conservative
Conservative doesn't inherently mean classically liberal though. And he is NOT a leftie.
>Highest favorability/biggest among young voters
1. young voters are mentally retarded,
Youth representation WON doe.
2. He's not gonna win no matter how hard you push it
There are other reasons to vote for him besides him simply winning. Like a protest vote, for example.
>Wants to ban lobbying
He will fail
No he won't, and even if this were true every other candidate would as well.
>Wants to regulate big pharma and food, anti-vax
ehh I guess this is okay. But Americans are mostly unhealthy because they're lazy and stupid and not because of the quality of food.
This is dumb. People eat what's around them, and what's around them is disgusting.
RFK is just an ordinary libtard who happens to be a vax-skeptic. That's the only issue he is "good" on.
Nope.
Also, the Kennedies suck.
None of his family has openly supported him, many have rallied against him. They bring shame to RFK and JFK.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've never seen a point in american politics. It's just ruled by corporate, they conjure moral dilemmas to control the masses and gain votes for themselves, and do so in syncretism for potential material gain (example is the oil raids in the middle east). In my opinion, there is no saving america. It should just go back to being isolationist so europe doesn't have to be under the buttfucker dictatorship (nato), and jews will have no power again.
 
I checked the booru recently, 91 results for joe biden, 297 for donald trump, NOTHING for Kennedy
This is a major oversight in the Kennedy campaign I feel
unipartyACK.png

Over two months later, I finally got around to Kennedyjakking
I planned to hold this off until I made more images, but with Biden dropping out I better get it in
Also I planned to have it look like this but I preferred it with the caption entirely visible
unipartyACK1.png
 
>environmental lawyer for 40 years
>knows how to actually drain the swamp
>antivax
>classical liberal
>highest favorability
>biggest among young voters
>can form a coherent sentence
>wants to ban lobbying
>wants to regulate big pharma and food
>both sides currently seething over him

>inb4 muh wasted vote even though both candidates are shit


Will you be voting for him? If not, why not?
View attachment 5308

Voting is for fags...
 
>environmental lawyer for 40 years
>knows how to actually drain the swamp
>antivax
>classical liberal
>highest favorability
>biggest among young voters
>can form a coherent sentence
>wants to ban lobbying
>wants to regulate big pharma and food
>both sides currently seething over him

>inb4 muh wasted vote even though both candidates are shit


Will you be voting for him? If not, why not?
View attachment 5308
GTG6akobcAQTgJ-

derpa derpa derpity dooo... voting is for fags and if you do it you're one too.
 
GTG6akobcAQTgJ-

derpa derpa derpity dooo... voting is for fags and if you do it you're one too.
Whatever, but you'll at least concede that since Bobby's an independent worries of him being appointed by a statist regime attempting to control you is stifled, right? Let's also consider that many of the issues associated with liberal democracies in your article began in the 70s, which is around the time many of the frivolous laws Bobby wants to repeal started to show up.
 
Whatever, but you'll at least concede that since Bobby's an independent worries of him being appointed by a statist regime attempting to control you is stifled, right? Let's also consider that many of the issues associated with liberal democracies in your article began in the 70s, which is around the time many of the frivolous laws Bobby wants to repeal started to show up.
I've lived in Mexico for almost a decade without paperwork. I don't give a fuck about your retard statism bro...
 
I've lived in Mexico for almost a decade without paperwork. I don't give a fuck about your retard statism bro...
Understood, that's why you made an article about and are complaining about this supposed statism.

And quit bragging about living in a shithole. You're not John McAfee.
 
Understood, that's why you made an article about and are complaining about this supposed statism.

And quit bragging about living in a shithole. You're not John McAfee.
Cute psyop. Retard did bad drugs in Belize. Nothing more. I was here. ;)
 
>Cute pysop or however my neighbour Satoko sharts in the Meximart
 
Back
Top