- Joined
- Apr 7, 2024
- Messages
- 1,938
Our /pol/ or the cuck's?
X Immigrant
Guest
Sharty /pol/, although shilling it on 4chinz /pol/ sounds like a good idea.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2024
- Messages
- 12,519
this would work if people on the sharty were old enough to vote
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2024
- Messages
- 7,550
He supports murder, I don't like him.
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2024
- Messages
- 8,230
Is it even politically viable to oppose abortion anymore? I heard a position that said Republicans before the overturning only offered lip service against abortion so people could vote for them, knowing they actually can’t do anything, likely losing that support once Dobs opened the door for it
Still better the rest, I like how Bobby focuses on less sensationalized problems
Still better the rest, I like how Bobby focuses on less sensationalized problems
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2024
- Messages
- 2,451
pro-lifers aren't going anywhere for the forseeable future
soy beer
Guest
If you were the guy who made the RFK thread, I was the other third party guy who was talking to you.
I'll probably vote RFK because why not.
I'll probably vote RFK because why not.
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2024
- Messages
- 137
r/coolguides tranny above
X Immigrant
Guest
What you missed is that he supports the mass-funding of organizations that provide care to women who commit abortion for financial or social reasons.
X Immigrant
Guest
What made you change your mind? Do you still think it's over in terms of a third part candidate?
soy beer
Guest
Voting for a third party candidate that can be reasonably expected to get a lot of votes in a given election is a rare opportunity I don't want to miss. That and it signals discontent voting en masse for one single third party rather than fracturing dissidents into a bunch of tiny literal who parties.
I still obviously don't think he'll win nor do I think he'll get the same level of success as, say, George Wallace in '68.
X Immigrant
Guest
Him and your party collaborated recently interestingly enough.
soy beer
Guest
That's neat, but it'll probably do him a disservice if anything. The most schizo, unhinged, one-issue primary candidate that ran for my party ended up getting the nomination. He's very much one of those conservatives who put being pro-life and Christianity in general first.
It's a shame really. There was this one guy running, Joel Skousen, who really stood out to me. He had very pragmatic and well thought out ideas. Didn't go on fellating the constitution as a flawless document or the founders as flawless men, gave words of support to the efforts of the anti-federalists, balanced the interests of Christians and libertarians well.
X Immigrant
Guest
In the long term perhaps, but it was definitely a short term gain since he made the California ballot with their help.
soy beer
Guest
My party's actually the Constitution Party, not that there's a meaningful difference between the two apart from size.
soy beer
Guest
Buchanansisters...
Attachments
Aedra
Guest
You still shouldn't support anyone who wants murder (abortion) to be legal though. Murder is murder even if he wants it to be in a lesser scale, you should support someone who wants to ban it completely, no?
Aedra
Guest
It does not matter. Right is right even if no one does it, and wrong is wrong even if everybody is wrong about it.
X Immigrant
Guest
He is going to create a limit similar to that of Trump, so I'm gonna kind of have to.
You're not into politics that much, are you...
Aedra
Guest
>both candidates only interested in limiting it and not completely banning it
Actually I am. And I do understand nuance. But I still refuse to give up on my principles.
Similar threads
- istanbul
- /pol/ - Politics
