• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

Holy Larp couple

>we wont give our daughter a female name because studies show™ that she has a higher chance of being unhappy
Wait, do people actually do this? It's so much easier to come up with a nice girl's name than a male name. I have loads of girl's names. Honestly if you put me a gun to my head and asked me to name 5 boy's names I liked then I probably couldn't do it.
 
Imagine learning you weren't a product of love but of bio engineering. Imagine learning you have 70 siblings that were slaughtered by your own parents in the pursuit to make you some obelisk of perfection. That you were just another one of their many lab rats, that they would've killed you just as easily if you showed signs of imperfection. What a grim ****ing circumstance to be born into. Your parents don't see you as human. "Тitan Invictus". Not even your name is human.
Better than being a product of lust and realizing that your whore mother killed 70 siblings because "i be havin big things in my futcha fr" only to birth you with autism because she's 35 and your dad is black and all she did with her life was was get a job as a cashier and get ditched by her baby dad
Or whatever
 
Better than being a product of lust and realizing that your whore mother killed 70 siblings because "i be havin big things in my futcha fr" only to birth you with autism because she's 35 and your dad is black and all she did with her life was was get a job as a cashier and get ditched by her baby dad
Or whatever
Isn't eugenics a form of motherly love, to expect the children to grow strong and healthy, instead of just giving birth to a hydrocephalic homunculus and let it suffer the rest of its pathetic and short life?
 
Well those parents did a lot of sh1t to predict a baby's genetical strength and seems they did it, just trust the science, man. Modern Evgenics will be based and cool and based and functional and effective or whatever
You can't predict much based on genetics, you can merely prove negative traits, really.
 
Isn't eugenics a form of motherly love, to expect the children to grow strong and healthy, instead of just giving birth to a hydrocephalic homunculus and let it suffer the rest of its pathetic and short life?
I'm not a parent, but i feel like the real parental love would be doing everything to help your child succeed rather than killing 70 of your own kids to put one on easy mode.
Eugenics can definitely be out of love (I imagine) in some cases, but that many re-rolls seems like complete apathy towards their unborn children more than anything else.
If it was just about making sure they aren't utterly disabled, it wouldn't have taken 70 tries.
Moreover, if you really believe in Eugenics you'd stop trying to spread the genes that somehow lead to 70 "failed" offspring in a row. The one that makes it is still going to have that shit DNA (assuming the 70 dead cracker babies were actually defective and not just "not perfect")
<
Yap fest over
 
Mothers will gamble their pregnancies until they birth a 300 IQ aryan baby and eventually save the whole planet, isn't this good? This is the peak of natural selection and literally what nature wants animals to do.
You can't predict much based on genetics, you can merely prove negative traits, really.
Well that, let a fetus with the less negative traits be born
I'm not a parent, but i feel like the real parental love would be doing everything to help your child succeed rather than killing 70 of your own kids to put one on easy mode.
Eugenics can definitely be out of love (I imagine) in some cases, but that many re-rolls seems like complete apathy towards their unborn children more than anything else.
If it was just about making sure they aren't utterly disabled, it wouldn't have taken 70 tries.
Moreover, if you really believe in Eugenics you'd stop trying to spread the genes that somehow lead to 70 "failed" offspring in a row. The one that makes it is still going to have that **** DNA (assuming the 70 dead ******* babies were actually defective and not just "not perfect")
<
Yap fest over
Just because we have technology and stuff doesn't put us in easy mode, we are just superior to non-human animals.
The same applies here, we can get rid of unnecessary struggle of genetically inferior humans by eugenics, as we got rid of unnecessary struggle like manual hunting, replacing it with almost automatic industrial cattle holocausts.
 
White people shouldn't be able to genetically modify their children to be better, this should only be allowed for minorities like jews and blacks. If anything, ypipo should be genetically engineered to be dumber and less good.
 
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MY FEEFEES YOU CAN'T TERMINATE THE HECKIN' FETUSERINO!!
484.png

i (17).jpeg

PvhT1ZDl.jpg

<Hm, 10% chance of brown hair. Let's try again, honey
_qLqHFk5XE0.jpg
 
Just because we have technology and stuff doesn't put us in easy mode, we are just superior to non-human animals.
The same applies here, we can get rid of unnecessary struggle of genetically inferior humans by eugenics, as we got rid of unnecessary struggle like manual hunting, replacing it with almost automatic industrial cattle holocausts.
The ironic thing is that you think that you wouldn't have been aborted if you were in this situation. Nobody here would exist.
 
I feel like the parents wouldn't go through this much trouble if the state they lived in banned abortion. (either way they would probably release their ""failed"" children in an adoption center) I still find it weird some parents decide to take care of children that will, statistically, never grow up to be a functioning adult (infants born with microcephaly and ancephaly, for example. They will never do anything except breathe and stay in the same place like a useless vegetable)
 
Back
Top