- Joined
- May 28, 2024
- Messages
- 10,532
You mean those same medieval “””””””””Christians””””””””” who expelled those Jews “109 times”? Go figure.T. >the 12 year old girls married off in medieval Christian europe
You mean those same medieval “””””””””Christians””””””””” who expelled those Jews “109 times”? Go figure.T. >the 12 year old girls married off in medieval Christian europe
1. This is heresy1. Original sin is the tendency to sin innate in all human beings, not a sin committed the moment the infant is born you moron.
2. You’re asking like 50 questions at once in an attempt to get me to fold which isn’t gonna work, I’m gonna reinstate by saying people married after puberty finished, it was rare and unheard of for a barely pre-teen to marry someone significantly older than them, and age-gaps of two grown and consent-capable adults were probably at MOST 5 or ten years.
As for “OOOH IT DOESN'T EXPLICITLY MENTION CHILD MARRIAGE SO THAT MEANS IT CONDONES IT LOL YOURE A PEDOPHILE” the Bible does not contain a comprehensive list of EVERY SINGLE SIN a person can possibly commit. If it did, its pages would literally be endless, and just because one specific sin is not mentioned in the Bible does not mean it is condoned, like how modern-day concepts of abortion or eugenics or racism are generally seen by the Church as sinful despite not being explicitly denounced. In general, if an action is not please worthy to God, it is sinful, people understood this and were not degenerate enough to engage in such sick practices as marrying children.
If you ask the same question which I already answered one more time, then you hereby declare that you are the gayest homosexual that has ever used the sharty.
3. “A few jokes” I don’t see what so funny about soylita chilling in a backyard with no clothes on nor do I see the “joke” in any of the other shitty shitlitas you made. And no I did not “volunteer to sift through thousands of soylita posts” I just noticed that most of them were garbage and I quickly deposed of more than 80% percent of soylita images via mass-selecting. It took like less then 10 minutes which was for sure less time than it took you to post soylita’s face over a naked cartoon.
4. I know you’re a secularist, do not lie to me. And I only laughed at your silly post saying “we must return to European paganism” and you along with the shia dog instantly began screeching about da jooooooooooos and da christcuuuuuuuck. You and him haven’t pointed out any inconsistencies and have so far only made wild and outlandish claims without any evidence.
Lastly I have not denied that a “Semitic” book is “unaryan”, as “aryan“ is a fantasy term which means nothing especially in the face of the word of God.
You mean those same medieval “””””””””Christians””””””””” who expelled those Jews “109 times”? Go figure.
1. Literally how? You’re not an expert in Christian theology so don’t go around telling what’s heresy or not1. This is heresy
2. Every sin someone can commit is either in the bible or is something you can deduce with scripture. But the problem here isn't just that the sin isn't in the bible, it's something that was not even included in the laws given to the Israelites by god when it was something endemic to the Middle East at the time. There was no biblical punishment for doing this.
3. You know, I was scrolling through my picsart folder a week or so ago, and I found that picture. And this isn't even true. Soylita is sitting on a chair in the background (not naked) reading a newspaper, it is the female cobson who is sunbathing and who cobson is ogling at. And I did this on purpose, even though it would obviously make more canonical sense for Hornyson to be staring at Soylita, because I viewed that as too obscene and tasteless. So I used the female cobson instead for that. There were like 3 female variants at the time. Again, it was a coally post, I 100% agree, but you lied about it.
I made the female cobson largely as a replacement for soylita, because I did not like the pedophilic undertones of Soylita.
You "mass selected" many posts which were famous soyjak art parodies (not mine, but other peoples) that barely had soylita in them, because of this laziness, and again I have noticed many posts missing which did not have soylita in them, so I don't know if I am able to believe this.
4. What is your problem with Shia Islam? It is the Wahhabi Sunnis who blow up buildings. I am a believer in the true Tradition.
5. You are an anti-white racist.
1. Sin means "without", it means "distance from God" or "lacking in divinity". When we are born into this world, we are born in a fallen state. The entire world is fallen, it has this sort of miasma of original sin. This is why Catholics historically believed that unbaptized babies were sent to limbo, and today they only believe that it is best to hope through God's grace that the unbaptized infants are given a proper ending.1. Literally how? You’re not an expert in Christian theology so don’t go around telling what’s heresy or not
2. It is in the sense that if it’s not pleasing to God, it’s a sin, not in the sense that every single sin is mentioned discretely or otherwise, and I gave the examples of abortion eugenics and racism to back it up.
3. Not reading all that cope you’re a pedophile who made erotic soylita edits and I will not let that go until you surrender
4. Idk I just like saying shia dog
5. Haha very funny pal
I should have a damn Soyjak Purple Heart for my service against 'litaposters. And instead you're happy to slander me to win an argument. You're basically the moral equivalent of someone robbing a homeless veteran with three purple hearts.Whoever slanders his neighbor secretly I will destroy. Whoever has a haughty look and an arrogant heart I will not endure. – Psalm 101:5
1. Catholic doctrine is not strictly speaking for all of Christian theology + limbo isn’t hell + you’re proving your past claims about Israelites killing innocent babies false by now claiming that babies are inherently evil. You’re owning yourself more than you’re owning my arguments.1. Sin means "without", it means "distance from God" or "lacking in divinity". When we are born into this world, we are born in a fallen state. The entire world is fallen, it has this sort of miasma of original sin. This is why Catholics historically believed that unbaptized wizards were sent to limbo, and today they only believe that it is best to hope through God's grace that the unbaptized infants are given a proper ending.
2. Abortion eugenics and racism can be deduced from biblical scripture, although I would argue that racism and eugenics (so long as it doesn't devolve into euthenics) being a sin is probably a point against Christianity because it is obviously a reflection of scientific fact, and this is why countless Catholic theologians have defended racialism. Again, this is sort of besides the point because a lot of things can through many large constructions be derived from scripture. You can justify being against child marriage by citing that it is dangerous for children, it is the fact that the laws given to Israel never state this at a time where this was unknown is the problematic () part
3.
I should have a damn Soyjak Purple Heart for my service against 'litaposters. And instead you're happy to slander me to win an argument. You're basically the moral equivalent of someone robbing a homeless veteran with three purple hearts.
View attachment 120952
4. "Aryan and Unaryan is fantasy" is basically exactly what Noel Ignatiev (very famous anti-white racist, perhaps the worst) was saying about how the White race is not real and is just white privilege
1. It is 2000 years of theology by the brightest minds in Europe, I trust it most. + limbo is neutralplier for eternity, it is not hell but it is not heaven either + Humans are born in total depravity so nobody "deserves" anything, goodness in this world is part of God's grace. But human beings still need a very good reason to kill someone who hasn't done anything wrong.1. Catholic doctrine is not strictly speaking for all of Christian theology + limbo isn’t hell + you’re proving your past claims about Israelites killing innocent wizards false by now claiming that wizards are inherently evil. You’re owning yourself more than you’re owning my arguments.
2. Yeah well soyience is a bunch of hodgepodge and is an industry solely based off producing new lies, like the monkey to human bullshit theory which was pretty much invented on the spot and used for racial purposes and money. Soyience debunks nothing and I already provided examples earlier of how pedophilia is deduced to a sin through scripture.
3. No no no, you clueless little thing, I removed soylita images, you created them. I am the veteran, not you, ME.
4. I don’t care what some random literal who I’ve never heard of has to say. Hitler drank water and I drink water that don’t mean I’m a hitlerist now does it?
Oh so Christianity is not a Jewish ploy to kill the goyim? Thanks for debunking yourself.1. It is 2000 years of theology by the brightest minds in Europe, I trust it most.
Nobody careslimbo is neutralplier for eternity, it is not hell but it is not heaven either
If God himself telling you to take punishment on an enemy nation isn't a good enough reason I don't know what is.Humans are born in total depravity so nobody "deserves" anything, goodness in this world is part of God's grace. But human beings still need a very good reason to kill someone who hasn't done anything wrong.
Soyience has no objective morality or set of rules in place, so it condones child-marriage and science fans are pedophiles.2. If science is hodgepodge then you truly can't deduce anything is a sin outside of scripture, because you have no way of predicting the natural consequences of any action
The only aryan race is the pacer test I won first place back in the 5th.4. The Aryan Race is real though
I never said Christianity was a Jewish ploy, and even if I did that theory ends with Paul. After Paul, nobody else is "in on it", and before paul nobody else is "in on it"Oh so Christianity is not a Jewish ploy to kill the goyim? Thanks for debunking yourself.
This is getting off-topic. The point is that if God warrants the Jews killing infants of idolaters, and doesn't instead encourage their conversion, why would the Jews of more recent times feel differently towards non-Jews?If God himself telling you to take punishment on an enemy nation isn't a good enough reason I don't know what is.
Science does not condone child marriage and even soyjaks are not pedophiles, despite their other moral failures.Soyience has no objective morality or set of rules in place, so it condones child-marriage and science fans are pedophiles.
The only aryan race is the pacer test I won first place back in the 5th.
Well if it is then it’s good to know that I am actually European unlike you, iranian shia dog who desperately wishes he were white@Gem Control
The Aryan race is real lil bro, you s*mites are not part of it
1. Finally you say something that isn’t utter nonsenseI never said Christianity was a Jewish ploy, and even if I did that theory ends with Paul. After Paul, nobody else is "in on it", and before paul nobody else is "in on it"
This is getting off-topic. The point is that if God warrants the Jews killing infants of idolaters, and doesn't instead encourage their conversion, why would the Jews of more recent times feel differently towards non-Jews?
Science does not condone child marriage and even soyjaks are not pedophiles, despite their other moral failures.
The pacer test was Aryan actually. Fatniks hate it
The Israelites definitely did not respect the foreigners religion. What you say about Christ may very well be true but from the point of view of a Jew it is ostensibly untrue, and furthermore they have a quite different view of the Messiah, so the Jew is still biblically grounded in his Loxism.1. Finally you say something that isn’t utter nonsense
2. Well in the beginning the ancient Israelite religion was more of a ethnic thing, and seeking converts wasn’t much of a thing. The Israelites respected the foreigners religion, and in turn the foreigners were to respect the Israelites religion and not try to subvert it. When they did, they were dealt with punishment because the Lord is a fire and does seek judgement. After Christ, the barrier between Jew and Gentile broke, and the Lord fully revealed himself to the nations. Any modern-day hatred between the two is unfortunately a result of geopolitical tension and past events, but thankfully the divide appears to be healing, with both sides showing mutual respect more and more.
Congrats you are ashkenazi jewWell if it is then it’s good to know that I am actually European unlike you, iranian shia dog who desperately wishes he were white
it's js an ethnicity brahbtw guess who mView attachment 121718ade the term aryan and what it means
respect ur superiors lil bro