Christianity is non-Aryan in origin.

[ZOGs #1 Supporter]

Wanna know the real reason I'm superior?
I have a negative reaction scoreView attachment 116476

SQQN...

 

[ZOGs #1 Supporter]

MAGIC MAN CAME BACK TO LIFE BECAUSE THIS BOOK SAYS SO

>magic man coming back to life because a bunch of kikes said so

 

[Gem Control]

> If Rebekah was born a decade or so before Sarah’s death, Rebekah would be a young woman of child-bearing age, not a child of 3.
Therefore, 13, not 3 according to this

You’re pulling the 13 number out of your ass. Everything is speculation and here say with no evidence. The Bible describes a 12 year old as a little kid and Rebekah was described as a woman. So is it logical to say she was a pre-teen? You need to stop projecting your pedophilia on others.

 

[ZOGs #1 Supporter]

You’re pulling the 13 number out of your ass. Everything is speculation and here say with no evidence. The Bible describes a 12 year old as a little kid and Rebekah was described as a woman. So is it logical to say she was a pre-teen? You need to stop projecting your pedophilia on others.

not how that works but an insult is an insult so take muh heckin uptood nyeguh

 

[Gem Control]

not how that works

Elaborate

 

[Victorio]

You’re pulling the 13 number out of your ass. Everything is speculation and here say with no evidence. The Bible describes a 12 year old as a little kid and Rebekah was described as a woman. So is it logical to say she was a pre-teen? You need to stop projecting your pedophilia on others.

Literally the word "decade" was used, retard.
Cite where the Bible says 12 year old is a little kid

 

[Gem Control]

Literally the word "decade" was used, retard.
Cite where the Bible says 12 year old is a little kid

1. ‘There's no reason to assume that Rebekah had recently been born when Abraham got news of his extended family, nor that Sarah's death followed right on the heels of the sacrifice. The text simply does not say such things about the timing.’
2. Mark 5:42

 

[ZOGs #1 Supporter]

Elaborate

prove it. you said xe wuz pulling 13 out of his ass, prove it.

Cite where the Bible says 12 year old is a little kid

also this

 

[Gem Control]

prove it. you said xe wuz pulling 13 out of his ass, prove it.

He claimed Rebekah was born a decade before Sarah died, and then he slapped a 3 onto it and called it a day. I shouldn’t have to prove why reasoning this retarded is wrong, like how I shouldn’t have to prove that drinking water is unhealthy.

also this

Already did that

 

[Victorio]

1. ‘There's no reason to assume that Rebekah had recently been born when Abraham got news of his extended family, nor that Sarah's death followed right on the heels of the sacrifice. The text simply does not say such things about the timing.’
2. Mark 5:42

The quote literally just refers to her as a girl. The christkike cope is potent

 

[Gem Control]

The quote literally just refers to her as a girl. The christkike cope is potent

Okay, my point still stands as in it’s a girl and not a woman. This isn’t an own considering you’re making up random shit as you go along. Plus there’s different translations which use a word which is a synonym for a child.

 

[Lism]

1. I’m gonna say it one last time. They were punished for doing EVIL and coercing the Israelites into THEIR idolatry, leading them away from the God who delivered them from Egypt. Their punishments were necessary to insure the Covenant.
2. Sure buddy, SUUUUURE, here you are yet again making more outrageous claims without backing them up. A stray dog has more of a life than you.

1. The children and infant babies did not do evil though, and neither of course were the young children of the Egyptians. These are done for the sake of the Jews, not as punishment
2. So basically you're assuming that the Israelites just all married at 18 and never brought it up and knew for a fact that marrying under 18 was wrong (something the nations around them did) but unlike every other thing the nations around them did that was wrong, they never once included it in their holy book to say it was wrong? Come on man. Be reasonable. Argue in good faith.

He’s a shia dog

Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali! Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali! Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali! Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali!
Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali! Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali!
Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali! Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali!
Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali! Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali!
Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali! Salvation can only come from the blood of Ali!

 

[Gem Control]

1. The children and infant wizards did not do evil though, and neither of course were the young children of the Egyptians. These are done for the sake of the Jews, not as punishment
2. So basically you're assuming that the Israelites just all married at 18 and never brought it up and knew for a fact that marrying under 18 was wrong (something the nations around them did) but unlike every other thing the nations around them did that was wrong, they never once included it in their holy book to say it was wrong? Come on man. Be reasonable. Argue in good faith.

1. The Israelites were literally enslaved in Egypt, who knows how many Israelite infants were killed? This was divine justice because if the enemy infants were struck down, then their souls are saved because they did no evil. But if they are allowed to live they will continue doing harm against the Israelites and will be damned, it’s better to lose your body than spend eternity in hell. And don’t act like you’re some moral expert when you probably support eugenics and overlook/endorse ethnic cleansing or anything of the like.

2. I’m saying its far more reasonable that child marriage was unheard of beyond perhaps very few isolated incidents at most, then it is to say that the Bible condones pedophilia and all Jews and Christians are pedophiles.

 

[Lism]

1. The Israelites were literally enslaved in Egypt, who knows how many Israelite infants were killed? This was divine justice because if the enemy infants were struck down, then their souls are saved because they did no evil. But if they are allowed to live they will continue doing harm against the Israelites and will be damned, it’s better to lose your body than spend eternity in hell. And don’t act like you’re some moral expert when you probably support eugenics and overlook/endorse ethnic cleansing or anything of the like.

2. I’m saying its far more reasonable that child marriage was unheard of beyond perhaps very few isolated incidents at most, then it is to say that the Bible condones pedophilia and all Jews and Christians are pedophiles.

1. They are born with original sin

Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

2. We know it wasn't unheard of because know at the very least people around the Israelites did it quite often and that the successors to the Israelites allowed it with the parents permission based on biblical law. Many child marriages could have been prevented if in the bible it was ever clarified that it was bad, but that is never there. Again, many of the activities of the people around the Israelites are condemned in the bible and these people are problematized because they might influence the Israelites with these bad ways, but suddenly with the subject of child marriage you choose to believe that it was just an unspoken rule? Do you believe in the oral torah or something? Are you a rabbinic Jew? This might actually be as much mental gymnastics as the Muslims use to explain why their prophet married a 6 year old.

 

[Gem Control]

1. They are born with original sin

Who’s “they”?

1. They are born with original sin

2. We know it wasn't unheard of because know at the very least people around the Israelites did it quite often and that the successors to the Israelites allowed it with the parents permission based on biblical law. Many child marriages could have been prevented if in the bible it was ever clarified that it was bad, but that is never there. Again, many of the activities of the people around the Israelites are condemned in the bible and these people are problematized because they might influence the Israelites with these bad ways, but suddenly with the subject of child marriage you choose to believe that it was just an unspoken rule? Do you believe in the oral torah or something? Are you a rabbinic Jew? This might actually be as much mental gymnastics as the Muslims use to explain why their prophet married a 6 year old.

Here we go yet again, the dog makes a crazy claim with nothing to back it up, like clockwork. This is like the 20th time you’ve done this. Keep running in circles like a dog chasing its tail, retard.

And if the people around them were doing it then that literally just proves my earlier point where the enemy nations are evil and the Bible is the truth saving the Israelites from this evil. This nigga really just BTFO his own argument KEEEK

 

[Lism]

Who’s “they”?

Here we go yet again, the dog makes a crazy claim with nothing to back it up, like clockwork. This is like the 20th time you’ve done this. Keep running in circles like a dog chasing its tail, retard.

And if the people around them were doing it then that literally just proves my earlier point where the enemy nations are evil and the Bible is the truth saving the Israelites from this evil. This nigga really just BTFO his own argument KEEEK

1. Everyone including the infants and shit
2. How much simpler can I make this? Do I have to use syllogistic form?
P1: Condemnable things that the nations do in the bible are forbidden in the bible in order to stop the Israelites from emulating this bad behavior.
P2: The bible does not forbid child marriage, something that the nations do in the bible.
C: The bible does not hold child marriage as condemnable.

Are you assuming that the Israelites were able to be influenced into burning babies alive, but not child marriage? Or are you assuming that an "oral torah" existed prohibiting child marriage? Or do you disagree with one of the premises I laid out? Because I will gladly explain to you why they are sound.

 

[Gem Control]

1. Everyone including the infants and shit
2. How much simpler can I make this? Do I have to use syllogistic form?
P1: Condemnable things that the nations do in the bible are forbidden in the bible in order to stop the Israelites from emulating this bad behavior.
P2: The bible does not forbid child marriage, something that the nations do in the bible.
C: The bible does not hold child marriage as condemnable.

Are you assuming that the Israelites were able to be influenced into burning wizards alive, but not child marriage? Or are you assuming that an "oral torah" existed prohibiting child marriage? Or do you disagree with one of the premises I laid out? Because I will gladly explain to you why they are sound.

1. Original sin is dormant until the body is mature enough to make decisions and think rationally. Prior to the sin, the soul is innocent. So why do you care so much about original sin when your claim is that the Israelites dealing punishment on those who did evil things to them is a bad thing.
2. “The definition of child has varied from culture to culture and century to century. Most modern-day countries declare that a child is of legal age to marry between 18 and 21. For some countries, the age may be as low as 15. In ancient Jewish culture, girls were considered marriageable after they had completed puberty, but boys were not considered men in the fullest sense until age 20.” - (https://www.gotquestions.org/child-marriage.html)

The Bible does not condone child marriage no matter how much you project your pedophilic fantasies onto it, you sick soylita-posting secular bastard.

 

[Lism]

1. Original sin is dormant until the body is mature enough to make decisions and think rationally. Prior to the sin, the soul is innocent. So why do you care so much about original sin when your claim is that the Israelites dealing punishment on those who did evil things to them is a bad thing.
2. “The definition of child has varied from culture to culture and century to century. Most modern-day countries declare that a child is of legal age to marry between 18 and 21. For some countries, the age may be as low as 15. In ancient Jewish culture, girls were considered marriageable after they had completed puberty, but boys were not considered men in the fullest sense until age 20.” - (https://www.gotquestions.org/child-marriage.html)

The Bible does not condone child marriage no matter how much you project your pedophilic fantasies onto it, you sick soylita-posting secular bastard.

1. Headcanon headcanon headcanon... Human beings are born with original sin, it is part of being human, unless you have a very good reason to believe otherwise in which case tell me.
2. That same article:

However, the Bible does not state a particular marriageable age for either men or women. Much emphasis was given to a woman’s ability to conceive and bear children. Women were most likely younger than the men they married, perhaps even significantly so.

So what is it? The end of puberty as we scientifically understand it today? Or the end of puberty as they unscientifically understood it back then, i.e. being able to bear children? Why did God not teach them the moral mistake they were making? Does the bible even say anything justifying this quote? Does any archaeological study defend this quote? It seems like an ass-pull.

3. I posted, in two years and over 400 posts, a few jokes about soylita. If you're going to accuse me of being a pedophile for that, I ought to accuse you of being a pedophile for 'volunteering' to sift through thousands of Soylita posts. I mean sure, it's a noble task, but... I wouldn't do that. I don't want to see all that. I don't even like it when people post porn in the pending section.

4. I am not secular, and usually I support Christians and I could probably make much better arguments than you on this topic from your own perspective. But you have forced me to point out the wrong elements of the bible by denying that a semitic book is unaryan

 

[Victorio]

T. >the 12 year old girls married off in medieval Christian europe

 

[Gem Control]

1. Headcanon headcanon headcanon... Human beings are born with original sin, it is part of being human, unless you have a very good reason to believe otherwise in which case tell me.
2. That same article:

So what is it? The end of puberty as we scientifically understand it today? Or the end of puberty as they unscientifically understood it back then, i.e. being able to bear children? Why did God not teach them the moral mistake they were making? Does the bible even say anything justifying this quote? Does any archaeological study defend this quote? It seems like an ass-pull.

3. I posted, in two years and over 400 posts, a few jokes about soylita. If you're going to accuse me of being a pedophile for that, I ought to accuse you of being a pedophile for 'volunteering' to sift through thousands of Soylita posts. I mean sure, it's a noble task, but... I wouldn't do that. I don't want to see all that. I don't even like it when people post porn in the pending section.

4. I am not secular, and usually I support Christians and I could probably make much better arguments than you on this topic from your own perspective. But you have forced me to point out the wrong elements of the bible by denying that a semitic book is unaryan

1. Original sin is the tendency to sin innate in all human beings, not a sin committed the moment the infant is born you moron.

2. You’re asking like 50 questions at once in an attempt to get me to fold which isn’t gonna work, I’m gonna reinstate by saying people married after puberty finished, it was rare and unheard of for a barely pre-teen to marry someone significantly older than them, and age-gaps of two grown and consent-capable adults were probably at MOST 5 or ten years.

As for “OOOH IT DOESN'T EXPLICITLY MENTION CHILD MARRIAGE SO THAT MEANS IT CONDONES IT LOL YOURE A PEDOPHILE” the Bible does not contain a comprehensive list of EVERY SINGLE SIN a person can possibly commit. If it did, its pages would literally be endless, and just because one specific sin is not mentioned in the Bible does not mean it is condoned, like how modern-day concepts of abortion or eugenics or racism are generally seen by the Church as sinful despite not being explicitly denounced. In general, if an action is not please worthy to God, it is sinful, people understood this and were not degenerate enough to engage in such sick practices as marrying children.

If you ask the same question which I already answered one more time, then you hereby declare that you are the gayest homosexual that has ever used the sharty.

3. “A few jokes” I don’t see what so funny about soylita chilling in a backyard with no clothes on nor do I see the “joke” in any of the other shitty shitlitas you made. And no I did not “volunteer to sift through thousands of soylita posts” I just noticed that most of them were garbage and I quickly deposed of more than 80% percent of soylita images via mass-selecting. It took like less then 10 minutes which was for sure less time than it took you to post soylita’s face over a naked cartoon.

4. I know you’re a secularist, do not lie to me. And I only laughed at your silly post saying “we must return to European paganism” and you along with the shia dog instantly began screeching about da jooooooooooos and da christcuuuuuuuck. You and him haven’t pointed out any inconsistencies and have so far only made wild and outlandish claims without any evidence.

Lastly I have not denied that a “Semitic” book is “unaryan”, as “aryan“ is a fantasy term which means nothing especially in the face of the word of God.