I don't understand why you don't think having evidence matters to prove their hostility. There's been plenty of evidence of them not being hostile, like the screenshot Imperator just posted of them adhering clearly to a non-hostile stance in their relations to the Soysphere, or their long history of having not done anything bad to any Soysphere sites (with no raids or spam, no nothing, just sticking to their own corner and, at that, still remaining adherent to the rules of the Soysphere). If a community does turn out to be hostile, then we ban them, but we aren't banning an offsite community's members from here if they aren't hostile, because the rule has always specified "hostile off-site communities". So, "where did our backbone go?" There's a reason the spine connects to the brain. We should actually use our heads to reason what is hostile and what isn't, instead of going willy-nilly and banning everyone who we're slightly paranoid of. We should actually remember what the intent of the rule is, instead of simply tearing it off of that intent and swinging it around like a sledgehammer. "Hostile off-site communities." "Hostile"! There's a clear difference between people in a community who post soyjaks with each other while discussing SNCA debate subjects and people who share child porn with one another so that they can spam it on our sites, and making the choice to see no difference there just out of spite and rudeness towards these non-hostile people is retarded. You'd might as well be making them hostile by banning them, as they hold no current disdain towards us, and it would be far more beneficial for us to maintain that peace instead of slapping them around like scum.
