• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

SUPERHELL Ban megathread

Post thread
Usernames must be unique. said:
Tsmt they only kept Miko because he was liked. Hamas2 showed countless evidence that he had no clue what was going on in that server yet he still remains b&.
Click to expand...
Well he still should've been banned. We want to eradicate the use of discord altogether.
 
Redditor said:
OMGSISA
Click to expand...
SoytanZ.png
 
Chimperator said:
All discord servers are grooming nests, no exception.
Click to expand...
According to... your own word. Okay.
X Immigrant said:
Doesn't matter. It is literally a fucking soyjak-themed discord. Where did our backbone go? I don't care if the jannies didn't find anything they have their own 'cord server, why trust them?

This is the chance to be better than the sharty. Zero tolerance. There will be leaks in a month exposing a goonsesh VC there anyways.
Click to expand...
I don't understand why you don't think having evidence matters to prove their hostility. There's been plenty of evidence of them not being hostile, like the screenshot Imperator just posted of them adhering clearly to a non-hostile stance in their relations to the Soysphere, or their long history of having not done anything bad to any Soysphere sites (with no raids or spam, no nothing, just sticking to their own corner and, at that, still remaining adherent to the rules of the Soysphere). If a community does turn out to be hostile, then we ban them, but we aren't banning an offsite community's members from here if they aren't hostile, because the rule has always specified "hostile off-site communities". So, "where did our backbone go?" There's a reason the spine connects to the brain. We should actually use our heads to reason what is hostile and what isn't, instead of going willy-nilly and banning everyone who we're slightly paranoid of. We should actually remember what the intent of the rule is, instead of simply tearing it off of that intent and swinging it around like a sledgehammer. "Hostile off-site communities." "Hostile"! There's a clear difference between people in a community who post soyjaks with each other while discussing SNCA debate subjects and people who share child porn with one another so that they can spam it on our sites, and making the choice to see no difference there just out of spite and rudeness towards these non-hostile people is retarded. You'd might as well be making them hostile by banning them, as they hold no current disdain towards us, and it would be far more beneficial for us to maintain that peace instead of slapping them around like scum.
Goldy said:
stfu kike nigger, stop being such a spiteful clitty leaking cock sucker
Click to expand...
There isn't a need for the harsh language. Let's be nice to each other, here.
 
baqqrih said:
I don't understand why you don't think having evidence matters to prove their hostility. There's been plenty of evidence of them not being hostile, like the screenshot Imperator just posted of them adhering clearly to a non-hostile stance in their relations to the Soysphere, or their long history of having not done anything bad to any Soysphere sites (with no raids or spam, no nothing, just sticking to their own corner and, at that, still remaining adherent to the rules of the Soysphere). If a community does turn out to be hostile, then we ban them, but we aren't banning an offsite community's members from here if they aren't hostile, because the rule has always specified "hostile off-site communities". So, "where did our backbone go?" There's a reason the spine connects to the brain. We should actually use our heads to reason what is hostile and what isn't, instead of going willy-nilly and banning everyone who we're slightly paranoid of. We should actually remember what the intent of the rule is, instead of simply tearing it off of that intent and swinging it around like a sledgehammer. "Hostile off-site communities." "Hostile"! There's a clear difference between people in a community who post soyjaks with each other while discussing SNCA debate subjects and people who share child porn with one another so that they can spam it on our sites, and making the choice to see no difference there just out of spite and rudeness towards these non-hostile people is retarded. You'd might as well be making them hostile by banning them, as they hold no current disdain towards us, and it would be far more beneficial for us to maintain that peace instead of slapping them around like scum.
Click to expand...
Writing a wordswordswords just defending soysphere 'cord servers? Whatever. All I'm saying is the 'affy used to be wholesome chungus about the sharty too. And I can also mention that allowing soysphere 'cord servers to exist kind of gives me the feeling of a beginning of a pipeline.
 
X Immigrant said:
Writing a wordswordswords just defending soysphere 'cord servers? Whatever. All I'm saying is the 'affy used to be wholesome chungus about the sharty too. And I can also mention that allowing soysphere 'cord servers to exist kind of gives me the feeling of a beginning of a pipeline.
Click to expand...
watch your mouth grandad jerker
 

Similar threads

Xiuhcoyotl
Unban megathread
2
Replies
34
Views
465
WholesomeNigger
WholesomeNigger
SoytanEnthusiast
Autism Not ban megathread
2 3
Replies
51
Views
921
Warrior-Z
Warrior-Z
Autism Ban Megathread 2
Replies
15
Views
149
1844 or Something
1844 or Something
Pepsilord
Discussion Should the ban megathread be locked and public ban discussion be disallowed?
2
Replies
37
Views
751
Stephen
Stephen
Xiuhcoyotl
Ban Megathread Shitflinging
Replies
17
Views
255
dino
Back
Top