• Site is being DDOS'd by the shroom (they're DDOSing us and its slowing the soyjak blog)
    >over 1000 guests while about 30+ users are active

SUPERHELL Ban megathread

Post thread
1729816380839h.jpeg

total crakka death
 
DOLL (46%) said:
Nagolbud can speak in his own defense and handle his own bans. If what he said is true then this goes a bit further than the typical ban and the two of them will have to figure things out. As for the guy with the squiggly name, he can email me like everyone else.
Click to expand...
why is that nigger a janny anyway
 
DOLL (46%) said:
We had a vote to decide on whether to get rid of degenerates before they cement themselves on the site, and you guys said overwhelmingly for me to get rid of them. This is the result of democracy.
Click to expand...
Was this thread actually in earnest? It seemed like a jokey/ironic thing, and the rules were never updated to ban "degenerates" (or to even define what a "degenerate" is). Having rules against pedophilia and porn seemed more than sufficient. Banning people simply for being "degenerates" (i.e. anything that clittycel chuds don't like) would just make the site look like Stormfront (and turn the site into Stormfront).
 
DOLL (46%) said:
Nagolbud can speak in his own defense and handle his own bans. If what he said is true then this goes a bit further than the typical ban and the two of them will have to figure things out. As for the guy with the squiggly name, he can email me like everyone else.
Click to expand...
can you unban me here and discuss what allegations he said i did. Dont let censorship loving faggotbuds run rampant like a power tripping hypocrite. He banned me and he has gone away because he is too puss to face criticism
 
MoonMetropolis said:
Was this thread actually in earnest? It seemed like a jokey/ironic thing, and the rules were never updated to ban "degenerates" (or to even define what a "degenerate" is). Having rules against pedophilia and porn seemed more than sufficient. Banning people simply for being "degenerates" (i.e. anything that clittycel chuds don't like) would just make the site look like Stormfront (and turn the site into Stormfront).
Click to expand...
It was to see the consensus on getting rid of particularly abhorrent posters as opposed to letting them sit on the site. I use sexual deviants as the term as the majority of the brimstone users use their sexual identity and proclivities to identify themselves, so its much more focused than just me saying "annoying posters". I have zero intention to turn the site into Chuds.life or Stormfront, and I like people getting pissed off at each other and making creative insults as its funny and it gets people invested in the site.
 
DOLL (46%) said:
It was to see the consensus on getting rid of particularly abhorrent posters as opposed to letting them sit on the site. I use sexual deviants as the term as the majority of the brimstone users use their sexual identity and proclivities to identify themselves, so its much more focused than just me saying "annoying posters". I have zero intention to turn the site into Chuds.life or Stormfront, and I like people getting pissed off at each other and making creative insults as its funny and it gets people invested in the site.
Click to expand...
shouldn't you have unbanned her so that she could be used as bait to lure out the real deviants?
 

Similar threads

Xiuhcoyotl
Unban megathread
2
Replies
34
Views
470
WholesomeNigger
WholesomeNigger
SoytanEnthusiast
Autism Not ban megathread
2 3
Replies
51
Views
924
Warrior-Z
Warrior-Z
Autism Ban Megathread 2
Replies
15
Views
150
1844 or Something
1844 or Something
Pepsilord
Discussion Should the ban megathread be locked and public ban discussion be disallowed?
2
Replies
37
Views
752
Stephen
Stephen
Xiuhcoyotl
Ban Megathread Shitflinging
Replies
17
Views
255
dino
Back
Top