• Site is being failraided (they're DOSing us and it's not working)
    >3000 guests while about 30 users are active

SUPERHELL Ban megathread

1729816380839h.jpeg

total crakka death
 
Nagolbud can speak in his own defense and handle his own bans. If what he said is true then this goes a bit further than the typical ban and the two of them will have to figure things out. As for the guy with the squiggly name, he can email me like everyone else.
why is that nigger a janny anyway
 
We had a vote to decide on whether to get rid of degenerates before they cement themselves on the site, and you guys said overwhelmingly for me to get rid of them. This is the result of democracy.
Was this thread actually in earnest? It seemed like a jokey/ironic thing, and the rules were never updated to ban "degenerates" (or to even define what a "degenerate" is). Having rules against pedophilia and porn seemed more than sufficient. Banning people simply for being "degenerates" (i.e. anything that clittycel chuds don't like) would just make the site look like Stormfront (and turn the site into Stormfront).
 
Nagolbud can speak in his own defense and handle his own bans. If what he said is true then this goes a bit further than the typical ban and the two of them will have to figure things out. As for the guy with the squiggly name, he can email me like everyone else.
can you unban me here and discuss what allegations he said i did. Dont let censorship loving faggotbuds run rampant like a power tripping hypocrite. He banned me and he has gone away because he is too puss to face criticism
 
Was this thread actually in earnest? It seemed like a jokey/ironic thing, and the rules were never updated to ban "degenerates" (or to even define what a "degenerate" is). Having rules against pedophilia and porn seemed more than sufficient. Banning people simply for being "degenerates" (i.e. anything that clittycel chuds don't like) would just make the site look like Stormfront (and turn the site into Stormfront).
It was to see the consensus on getting rid of particularly abhorrent posters as opposed to letting them sit on the site. I use sexual deviants as the term as the majority of the brimstone users use their sexual identity and proclivities to identify themselves, so its much more focused than just me saying "annoying posters". I have zero intention to turn the site into Chuds.life or Stormfront, and I like people getting pissed off at each other and making creative insults as its funny and it gets people invested in the site.
 
It was to see the consensus on getting rid of particularly abhorrent posters as opposed to letting them sit on the site. I use sexual deviants as the term as the majority of the brimstone users use their sexual identity and proclivities to identify themselves, so its much more focused than just me saying "annoying posters". I have zero intention to turn the site into Chuds.life or Stormfront, and I like people getting pissed off at each other and making creative insults as its funny and it gets people invested in the site.
shouldn't you have unbanned her so that she could be used as bait to lure out the real deviants?
 
Back
Top