TRVTHNVKE Sahih al-Bukhari 5134

[Libba2]

warrior-z is currently masturbating to soytan porn that he approved on the booru, please wait

 

[cobbycov]

warrior-z is currently masturbating to soytan porn that he approved on the booru, please wait

turn on your profile posts gng

 

[Libba2]

turn on your profile posts gng

no

 

[cobbycov]

no

 

[Libba2]

i wonder if warrior-p stands for 'p or pooner

 

[Warrior-Z]

i'm not saying you don't know the word, i'm saying there are two scenarios,

No, retard, within one of those scenarios the containment within it is that I do not know the word which was the first one.

one of which leads to the fact you don't know the word, so which one is it?

I already gave a prerequisite so I can grant you the definition, I’m not under the obligation to give you anything?

 

[Warrior-Z]

actually you've stopped multiple times so far

Not really, do you know what “stopping” is? By stopping that means you quit engaging within the dialectic, the dialectic being on hold for a few minutes wouldn’t be a halt.

 

[Libba2]

No, retard, within one of those scenarios the containment within it is that I do not know the word which was the first one.

I already gave a prerequisite so I can grant you the definition, I’m not under the obligation to give you anything?

yes, that's the second scenario?

 

[Warrior-Z]

i wonder if warrior-p stands for 'p or pooner

I sense massive projection from this message.
Either way I’m gonna take my time slowly baking you.

 

[Warrior-Z]

yes, that's the second scenario?

So you acknowledge I know the word? (Under that I am not providing the definition?)

 

[Libba2]

So you acknowledge I know the word? (Under that I am not providing the definition?)

no, that's still up for question, the only way to know if you know is that if you provide the definition, otherwise the simplest conclusion is that you do not

 

[Warrior-Z]

no, that's still up for question,

And what’s gonna be the formal argument for that?

the only way to know if you know is that if you provide the definition,

And I have a prerequisite before doing so. Don’t you already know it?

otherwise the simplest conclusion is that you do not

How does Occams razor suggest that?

 

[Libba2]

And what’s gonna be the formal argument for that?

And I have a prerequisite before doing so. Don’t you already know it?

How does Occams razor suggest that?

do you understand what a formal argument is?

 

[Warrior-Z]

do you understand what a formal argument is?

Yeah, do you? Don’t dodge the question.

 

[Libba2]

Yeah, do you? Don’t dodge the question.

i do, please present what you believe it is so we can gather a mutual understanding

 

[Warrior-Z]

i do, please present what you believe it is so we can gather a mutual understanding

Alright I believe in the analytical definition, not a connotation. Do you believe in the analytical defintion?

 

[Warrior-Z]

Your document also doesn't prove that Aisha was 19-20. It just says that we'll never know her true age but she was probably between 9-20.

It does if you scroll down, it presents you with dates from old historians.

 

[Libba2]

Alright I believe in the analytical definition, not a connotation. Do you believe in the analytical defintion?

you'd have to specify but i can break down the scenarios about your definition of argumentation more if it helps

 

[Warrior-Z]

you'd have to specify but i can break down the scenarios about your definition of argumentation more if it helps

There is no "scenario", I am talking about an analytical definition, that doesn't need to be specified lmao, it's very clear.
I can tell she's trying to act like she is on par but she's failing because she does't know.

 

[Libba2]

There is no "scenario", I am talking about an analytical definition, that doesn't need to be specified lmao, it's very clear.
I can tell she's trying to act like she is on par but she's failing because she does't know.

she?