TRVTHNVKE Sahih al-Bukhari 5134

BIGGEST TRVKE OF THE HIGHEST DEGREE
what is the third outcome then?
Third outcome; I give it after you go along with my prerequisite, and admit you dont know the definition. If you knew, this wouldn't be such a problem for you.
because if you were arguing in good faith
I don't want to argue in good faith, I wanna make you suffer in a discussion and expose how stupid you are as I cut your ego into pieces.
you would have already provided the definition
I will; If you say "Please my boss".
 
Third outcome; I give it after you go along with my prerequisite, and admit you dont know the definition. If you knew, this wouldn't be such a problem for you.

I don't want to argue in good faith, I wanna make you suffer in a discussion and expose how stupid you are as I cut your ego into pieces.

I will; If you say "Please my boss".
how can you claim there is a third outcome, and then you fall into the first outcome (you're not arguing in good faith)? seems like it wasn't such a false dichotomy, and yet I still don't believe you know what argumentation means
 
how can you claim there is a third outcome, and then you fall into the first outcome
No, the first outcome is that "I dont know it", except that I do, I know it but I want to cut you apart, you're not arguing in good faith either you were calling peple pedos and zoophiles left and right.
(you're not arguing in good faith)? seems like it wasn't such a false dichotomy, and yet
Your dichotomy was directly false due to one property not aligning with the situation retard.
I still don't believe you know what argumentation means
You can THINK that, doesn't make it true.
 
No, the first outcome is that "I dont know it", except that I do, I know it but I want to cut you apart, you're not arguing in good faith either you were calling peple pedos and zoophiles left and right.

Your dichotomy was directly false due to one property not aligning with the situation retard.

You can THINK that, doesn't make it true.
actually if you read my post the first outcome is that you do know it and you refuse to say it because you're arguing in bad faith
 
oh, i think he gave up
No, I went to check on the 'ru.
actually if you read my post the first outcome is that you do know it and you refuse to say it because you're arguing in bad faith
No, that doesn't matter, since it has one differing property then its not the case lmao. It seems you're arguing in bad faith as well because you're not admitting you dont know because it hurts your ego.
 
No, I went to check on the 'ru.

No, that doesn't matter, since it has one differing property then its not the case lmao. It seems you're arguing in bad faith as well because you're not admitting you dont know because it hurts your ego.
what's the differing property? all i see is that you claim to know the word, and that you are arguing in bad faith, which aligns with scenario one. good to see you're still a booru slave
 
I AM PULLIN' OUT 'OL RELIABLE
@Libba2 Go ahead and refute it bitch.
I mean a lot of people married young girls back then especially in arabistan. It would be weird for Mohammad if he didn't have a young wife.
Your document also doesn't prove that Aisha was 19-20. It just says that we'll never know her true age but she was probably between 9-20.
 
I mean a lot of people married young girls back then especially in arabistan. It would be weird for Mohammad if he didn't have a young wife.
Your document also doesn't prove that Aisha was 19-20. It just says that we'll never know her true age but she was probably between 9-20.
he already gave up because he can't beat me in an argument
 
1741458453061.png
 
That I do know the word, I read it directly and you said that I do not know the word and I’m being bad sth lmao.


In which you are as well? You poisoned the well from the start.

No, read above.
i'm not saying you don't know the word, i'm saying there are two scenarios, one of which leads to the fact you don't know the word, so which one is it? clearly, it's the first scenario
 
Just slammed two redbulls with a flugel to this thread
 
You do realize that I am known for never stopping in an argument, me taking a few minutes isn’t giving up, it’s just you being a chronically online faggot.
actually you've stopped multiple times so far
 
I am betting 15$ dollars this is yet another terrycrews alt. @DOLL take notes if i will turn out to be right you will owe me 30$. If i will be wrong you would owe me 0$
 
Back
Top