Soygoy
I will fight for /anthro/
- Joined
- May 22, 2024
- Messages
- 9,985
froot you did this btwView attachment 34251
Frootykins, do you like my art?
this is all your fault
froot you did this btwView attachment 34251
Frootykins, do you like my art?
I liked Soilgay back then and even i didn't like this thread.This nigga was the fun police, staff shill and suckup.
He was just ass mad his furfag thread got linespammed to hell, for like a month every image was squished for no reason thanks to his bandaid fix.I liked Soilgay back then and even i didn't like this thread.
You don't remember the old linespam that used to be able to destroy threads, its not just sigs.Why was this guy such a massive crybaby bitch? Holy shit. The "hide signatures" button is RIGHT THERE.
YOU WILL DIEcertain users of soyjak.blog have been abusing the lack of a height limit to spam threads
A full 1920 x 1080 or vice versa image renders as a 300px by 300px image due to max-width being 300px in css, but there is no max-height: 300px causing long 48 x 1080 images to render as long towers
3k by 3k image:
View attachment 34005
48 x 1000 image:
View attachment 34011
adding max-height: 300px to .bbImage could easily fix this and stop the effectiveness of users creating long 48 pixel wide 5000 pixel tall images that clear and ruin threads.
CSS:.bbImage { max-width: 300px; max-height: 300px; }
this is what it looks like after
View attachment 34012View attachment 34027
users have a max of 6 image embeds, which with max-height: 300px is 1,800 pixels because 300 x 6 images
which isnt nearly as annoying as 1080 * 6 which is 6,480 pixels, more than double the size of monitors of which most of us have (1080p)
from my testing, it hasn't negatively impacted the viewing of images in anyway
broot do this
SmallAnus has added an image that is 13500 pixels tall
View attachment 34026
you times that by 6, and without a height limit, your thread is gone.
be professional and stop letting users exploit your site
@Broot @Froot @Weebhunter3000
@baqqrih @Oot
mods pass this onto your higher ups
EDIT: The issue continues with videos.
Read more here: https://soyjak.blog/index.php?threads/new-exploit-fix-add-max-height-and-max-width-to-videos.5674/
kiwicucks are too lazy to impliment this and instead insist that people thumbnail their images so nulls clitty doesnt leakcertain users of soyjak.blog have been abusing the lack of a height limit to spam threads
A full 1920 x 1080 or vice versa image renders as a 300px by 300px image due to max-width being 300px in css, but there is no max-height: 300px causing long 48 x 1080 images to render as long towers
3k by 3k image:
View attachment 34005
48 x 1000 image:
View attachment 34011
adding max-height: 300px to .bbImage could easily fix this and stop the effectiveness of users creating long 48 pixel wide 5000 pixel tall images that clear and ruin threads.
CSS:.bbImage { max-width: 300px; max-height: 300px; }
this is what it looks like after
View attachment 34012View attachment 34027
users have a max of 6 image embeds, which with max-height: 300px is 1,800 pixels because 300 x 6 images
which isnt nearly as annoying as 1080 * 6 which is 6,480 pixels, more than double the size of monitors of which most of us have (1080p)
from my testing, it hasn't negatively impacted the viewing of images in anyway
broot do this
SmallAnus has added an image that is 13500 pixels tall
View attachment 34026
you times that by 6, and without a height limit, your thread is gone.
be professional and stop letting users exploit your site
@Broot @Froot @Weebhunter3000
@baqqrih @Oot
mods pass this onto your higher ups
EDIT: The issue continues with videos.
Read more here: https://soyjak.blog/index.php?threads/new-exploit-fix-add-max-height-and-max-width-to-videos.5674/