Only took me a couple seconds to scroll through all that..
cuban ipad
used middle mouse button awardOnly took me a couple seconds to scroll through all that.
Holy soysince when do you think you deserve some form of control over the site? you're not a janny.
you don't get to decide which threads are worthy of denying access to them.
how would you like it if i decided that i dont want you to be here anymore, so i'll just spam all of your posts with extremely large images?
I actually (to a small extent for your case) do let personal biases get in the way of my jannying, which is why I haven't temporarily banned you for all of the tower-spam, because it is still spam, so it's against the rules, but I don't want to ban you. I usually just delete it when it gets in my way, or when a report from someone else comes in for your posts in one of the spammed threads.Baqqrih: (From before he became a staff member, but I'm sure he doesn't let his personal biases get in the way of his jannying) Tried to dissuade people from reporting my linespam, and defended me by saying "You can't yank a diligent man from his duty.".
this doesn't exactly set a good precedent for this siteI actually (to a small extent for your case) do let personal biases get in the way of my jannying, which is why I haven't temporarily banned you for all of the tower-spam, because it is still spam, so it's against the rules, but I don't want to ban you. I usually just delete it when it gets in my way, or when a report from someone else comes in for your posts in one of the spammed threads.
nvm they fixed it gg
I'm sorry that it seems that way. No major action (as in, bans) seems to be taken by the other jannies in regard to the issue, so I simply go along with them.this doesn't exactly set a good precedent for this site
well atleast i won in the endI'm sorry that it seems that way. No major action (as in, bans) seems to be taken by the other jannies in regard to the issue, so I simply go along with them.
nobodycertain users of soyjak.blog have been abusing the lack of a height limit to spam threads
A full 1920 x 1080 or vice versa image renders as a 300px by 300px image due to max-width being 300px in css, but there is no max-height: 300px causing long 48 x 1080 images to render as long towers
3k by 3k image:
View attachment 34005
48 x 1000 image:
View attachment 34011
adding max-height: 300px to .bbImage could easily fix this and stop the effectiveness of users creating long 48 pixel wide 5000 pixel tall images that clear and ruin threads.
CSS:.bbImage { max-width: 300px; max-height: 300px; }
this is what it looks like after
View attachment 34012View attachment 34027
users have a max of 6 image embeds, which with max-height: 300px is 1,800 pixels because 300 x 6 images
which isnt nearly as annoying as 1080 * 6 which is 6,480 pixels, more than double the size of monitors of which most of us have (1080p)
from my testing, it hasn't negatively impacted the viewing of images in anyway
broot do this
SmallAnus has added an image that is 13500 pixels tall
View attachment 34026
you times that by 6, and without a height limit, your thread is gone.
be professional and stop letting users exploit your site
@Broot @Froot @Weebhunter3000
@baqqrih @Oot
mods pass this onto your higher ups
im fine with this because it allows scrollable pagesnobody
cares