Supreme falsehood that you can't articulate because they did literally nothing but btfo muzzies (based)
marge
Why yes I do this
I don't have a filed named that
KEEEEEEEEEEK HE AVOIDED MY REFUTATION
You literally called hadiths lies and faleshoods, and you directly claimed they were intentionally fabricated, and now you're crying that you've been asked to prove it?
You're so profoundly obsessed with me just because I'm not a pedophile like you
Ad hominem
I’m talking about a file I didn’t want to say the rest of due to its perversity and nsfw content
So much copium and rejection of basic facts and retardation to world history
>that built modern western civilization today
Have never referred to hadiths as "lies." What I did was to raise doubts regarding the interpretations offered for their contents, which stands true historically. You do not need to prove the intentional fabrication of a source in order to criticize it, that's merely you trying weakly to dodge the real argument. Saying it's schizo is but a weak and pathetic attempt to escape some solid evidence. If you're confident, address the timeline then, no balls.
Why lie? we can see your post history, plus the schizodoc you're posting literally says the same thing. Two seperate references to the same phenomenon in history does require STRONG evidence to disprove and it would also logically imply an intentional FABRICATION, that's your claim, own it
>posting a google doc is solid evidence
They literally made England and France with their discoveries come to the new world and make empires based off Spain’s model which we lead to and make way for Modern Western European civilization as we see it today retard
Critiquing the sources does not mean calling them "intentional fabrications." Alternative evidence raises challenges pertaining to interpretation, not authenticity. Two similar accounts do not make them unapproachable, dumbass. History is not a court of law where the standard of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Wanna know the funniest part? IS THAT I LITERALLY DID THAT MULTIPLE TIMES LMAO BUT YOU DIDNT READ IT BECAUSE YOU'RE A SCARED LITTLE CUCK, I CITED TABARI'S BOOK WHICH IS KNOWN KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK
Two seperate sources claiming the same thing would literally have to be collusion and intentional fabrication. Also you literally called them lies and the schizodoc you're posting claims the same thing. Stop lying and backpeddling on your claimsCritiquing the sources does not mean calling them "intentional fabrications." Alternative evidence raises challenges pertaining to interpretation, not authenticity. Two similar accounts do not make them unapproachable, dumbass. History is not a court of law where the standard of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt."
If you want a debate, stop sidestepping and look straight at the contradictions
>Google docs with bible maths is prominent unbiased historians from historical journals
If they based it off of spain's model they would have stagnated and got raped by the natives like the spanish did
Uhh meds the Spaniards were the ones raping natives that’s why Mesoamericans and South Americans aswell as Mexicans have Iberian DNA also the English and French empires were built off the Spanish model aswell as Spain literally discovering that land and exposing it to Europe
You’re honestly so retarded and are denying basic history I knew since I was 6 and that is common knowledge that everyone knows
Two sources backing up each other don’t automatically mean “collusion”. You’re simply presuming that because they match, they’re unquestionable. That’s not how history works. Multiple narratives may still be wrong or misrepresenting things. And no, I didn’t call them lies, I assessed the interpretation based on the evidence available. Stop spinning this and actually address the timeline and contradictions.
Oh and btw prove Al-Tabari wrote that google doc because he existed even before the internet lole.
