X migrant ack xer account

[Brainstorm]

Next janny better not mess with me

 

[RTErdogan]

But...just to finalize everything, does anyone have the rule-breaking post and her appeal?

what appeal

 

[istanbul]

when do we get a resolution to this

 

[Gemerald]

broot is viewing this thread

 

[USL]

Why even oppose Froot when you knew full well this would happen? It would be more understandable if it was an important topic but why sacrifice your damn account for some random woman. It's stupid.

Sad to see him go but he's always been too stubborn. He kind of asked for it by constantly reversing Froot's decisions. I hope he returns though.

He decided to live as a keyed 'teen, rather than a kneeling troon. S00t Bless xher...

 

[real_ishish_ears]

when do we get a resolution to this

X Immigrant's own actions resolved it himself.

 

[Fagon]

when do we get a resolution to this

never, for every single day this forum stays up we'll get a new thread about her being un or re banned, with 10+ pages of argumentation between users and tran jans in all of them.

 

[X Immigrant]

what appeal

The one she submitted via email

 

[Dremora]

He decided to live as a keyed 'teen, rather than a kneeling troon. S00t Bless xher...

Are you not in favor of banning those who defend child marriages?

 

[Fagon]

Are you not in favor of banning those who defend child marriages?

the standing up to froot part is keyed, even if it was for a gay reason.

 

[USL]

Are you not in favor of banning those who defend child marriages?

I don't know the context, but I do know I dislike the frootcord and just by default assume they are in the wrong.

 

[Dremora]

I don't know the context, but I do know I dislike the frootcord and just by default assume they are in the wrong.

For once, they aren't in the wrong. You can trust me on this. I'm not too fond of frootcord either.

 

[X Immigrant]

Are you not in favor of banning those who defend child marriages?

As far as I was aware for two days straight, and should have been expected to only have been aware of, I was in favor of not banning people who defended child marriages that did not involve sex when the wife was not of legal age.

 

[istanbul]

I don't know the context, but I do know I dislike the frootcord and just by default assume they are in the wrong.

>frootcord bans 'p therefore 'p le good

 

[X Immigrant]

My argument was concrete until it happened to be she was sunni Islam which was probably not mentioned outside of her blog.

 

[istanbul]

My argument was concrete until it happened to be she was sunni Islam which was probably not mentioned outside of her blog.

contrarian fail

 

[mischizo]

>frootcord bans 'p therefore 'p le good

so true xister, hop on der 'cord

 

[Froot]

We are equals when it comes to our say, although not for right now. He didn't prove why she should be banned, admitted to doing it because of muh fee fees, and didn't elaborate further. I had all the right, and I'll have it again.

we were never equals. you thought we were, but you forgot to read below my name "orange dictator", its in the title xweetie.
Welcome to FNWO

 

[Froot]

Yeah it does, you are sexually attracted to them if you're grooming them.

>marry someone youre not attracted to when youre clearly in a position of power
you really just argued that some creepy pedo nigger married a child but had no attraction to her? holy fucking mental gymnastics.
Please tell me the mudslime bitch gives the best head on your rapefugee camp, otherwise i see no reason for you to defend her this hard geeeeeeeeeeg

 

[Jimb0]

we were never equals. you thought we were, but you forgot to read below my name "orange dictator", its in the title xweetie.

this is your mindset frutoids