Why should (You) be a Christian?

[basil]

the Bible is pretty good reading material actually

 

[Nihilma]

The characteristics of the Christian God which make this a source of credibility (or lack thereof) are not relevant to Pagan religions

The gods are real, but do not derive any power from sacrifice. The will of the gods is also nebulous. The pagan demand for sacrifice is similar to the Abrahamic demand that you don't commit idolatry. God isn't jealous in the sense that he is envious of other exstent deities, he is angered that humans acting unjustly by dulling out his prayers to idols. Likewise, the gods are entitled sacrifice, but they do not *need* sacrifices. They do not need to punish humans who have never known of sacrifices, but they also do not need to reveal themselves to humanity. They are present to anyone who looks. The Greeks, Romans, Germans, and Indo-Iranians all predicted a low age of religious impiety, of forgetfulness, and did not consider this contradictory to their view of the gods. It's quite possible that the prophecized tribulation of the Bible is influenced by this. One day, there will be a rejuvenation. It is not unreasonable to say that the gods *did* punish the apostates, through the collapse of the Roman civilization.

The purpose of ritual is not to satiate the gods, it is to bring someone into a state of union with the gods through a shared feast. The festival was essentially a reenactment of a cosmogonic event.

Okay, I never claimed pagan gods had the same criterias of credibility than monotheism had. That was just an observation on my part, I even clarified that.

2) I did not claim that every pagan theology understood sacrifice as some form of satiation. Some do. My main point was that sacrifice, no matter what form it is given, is in fact a means to appease a god by having some sort of control over his mood.
One of the best examples of this is Zeus, who was offered literal bones by his worshippers because of one of the mythos involving Prometheus, Zeus gets deceived for the billionth time like the fool he is and instead of seeing the trick and getting mad, just fucking lets it be (Hesiod Theogony 535–545).
Here's another source studying roman and egyptian theology of sacrifice. From the quotes in latins, it is clearly meant that appeasing the gods was the goal of sacrifices made, human or not. (Jaucourt, Louis, chevalier de. "Pagan sacrifices.") http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0004.162
The celts were among those who sacrificed the most and were the fucking worst of the pagans esepcially in terms of human sacrifice, but since they were such baboons who could not write, I haven't found a single solid source to back these claims up with them. Same for the North, Snow baboons who were not able to write down their shit.

Anyway, no, the demand of pagan gods for sacrifice is not the same as the biblical God demanding to not commit idolatry. The theology is fundamentaly different. Whenever mentioned in the Hebrew Bible, idols are considered to be "lifeless" and "pieces of wood", not gods. At worst, the gods themselves are considered demons, not other existing gods. Also, the gods not punishing those who never knew sacrifice is quite okay, if it weren't for the fact that a good proportion of pagans converted to christianity on their own, and their gods did not smite them down for it.

 

[Nihilma]

I'm sorry I don't have much time to look in depth into it, if I ever have time I'll document myself better and get some more solid sources, I'm a bit empty handed and I have to sleep very soon.
Good evening to you.

 

[evandoe]

I don't know.

 

[baqqrih]

Why are christrannies like this? “iD rATher hAvE a 100% Christian EuROpe thEn a 100% WhITe eURopE if I wErE givEN tHE chAnCe bEcAUse thAT iS wHaT rABbI yEShUA toLd mE tO dO iN tHiS sHIt bOoK riGhT hErE thAT I thINK iS gOD” “I pErSonALY dONt mIND brOWns rEpLacInG mE iN mY hOMeLNad aSlong aS tHEy aRE chRIstIan bEcaUse a bOOk I thInK iS gOD tHaT wAS wrITTen bY deAD jeWs tOlD me tO”

Huh. Well, it's more complex than that, but you don't want to see it that way because you hate goodness and would rather love on your idol of racialism all day in order to pleasure your mind in this life while being ignorant of the hellfire to come. His question stated that these Blacks are "100% trad Christian" and that all of them attend church, and, at that, that the alternative in this hypothetical is for Europe to be 100% atheistic. From an atheistic standpoint, obviously, you'd see the former as the ideal, because you hate God to the extent of denying His existence, and so goodness has no importance to you since you are too inferior in the head to comprehend the elevated importance of anything metaphysical over worldly matters. The latter option is truthfully ideal between the two options, however, because, while neither outcome is good, as a blood race's replacement is certainly no good, the spiritual Israelitic race of Jesus, who is the Almighty standard for perfection in the universe, would still exist within the souls of this hypothetical Europe's inhabitants, while only the inferior race of blood would continue if Europe was only homogeneous in this worldly sense. Since the spiritual Israelitic race would continue in Europe, and because it is superior to the worldly races by its guarantee of salvation (only Christ's blood will provide you with eternal life, rather than the blood of your race), his strange hypothetical can only be answered best if this superiority of the soul over the blood is considered.
As I said, however, judging by your reply, your mind is too feeble to comprehend these concepts, so this will all sound like hogwash to you, and you will simply continue to whine about me being a "race traitor" because of my spiritual reasoning.

 

[Donald]

 

[Nihilma]

Huh. Well, it's more complex than that, but you don't want to see it that way because you hate goodness and would rather love on your idol of racialism all day in order to pleasure your mind in this life while being ignorant of the hellfire to come. His question stated that these Blacks are "100% trad Christian" and that all of them attend church, and, at that, that the alternative in this hypothetical is for Europe to be 100% atheistic. From an atheistic standpoint, obviously, you'd see the former as the ideal, because you hate God to the extent of denying His existence, and so goodness has no importance to you since you are too inferior in the head to comprehend the elevated importance of anything metaphysical over worldly matters. The latter option is truthfully ideal between the two options, however, because, while neither outcome is good, as a blood race's replacement is certainly no good, the spiritual Israelitic race of Jesus, who is the Almighty standard for perfection in the universe, would still exist within the souls of this hypothetical Europe's inhabitants, while only the inferior race of blood would continue if Europe was only homogeneous in this worldly sense. Since the spiritual Israelitic race would continue in Europe, and because it is superior to the worldly races by its guarantee of salvation (only Christ's blood will provide you with eternal life, rather than the blood of your race), his strange hypothetical can only be answered best if this superiority of the soul over the blood is considered.
As I said, however, judging by your reply, your mind is too feeble to comprehend these concepts, so this will all sound like hogwash to you, and you will simply continue to whine about me being a "race traitor" because of my spiritual reasoning.

Miss those times of endless religious obsessing of the early shlog kek.

 

[Pepsilord]

There are thousands and thousands of religions in the world, all of which claim to be the one true religion. They can't all be right, but they can definitely all be wrong.

Where is the logic in this?

 

[baqqrih]

I just think non-native blacks who rape kids and murder shouldn’t be in Europe at all.

Me neither, that's why the Blacks in the hypothetical are "100% trad Christian".

 

[jimbo]

Jewish fairytale spoken and practiced in the desert and desolate sand 2000 years ago.

 

[jimbo]

Marge, You know that the majority of redditors are Christian Right? Also hating niggers and Jews is explicitly the opposite of what redditors do.

are atheists white?

 

[baqqrih]

Oh, Okay. but still in the hypothetical situation I don’t want blacks no matter how Christian they are to take over Europe. No matter what.

That's fair, then, considering our difference in ideals. You're an atheist, I'm a Christian, so, naturally, we're going to prioritize different things in such a situation as that one. Good talk.

You know that the majority of redditors are Christian Right?

Really? Was there some online census of this?

 

[baqqrih]

Christianity in Europe actually helped to dissolve One’s identity with the Tribe just for a Jewish morality and thought-process that made them on purpose more Loyal to a Semitic Non-native God coming from the lands of the Near-East instead of Evrope. Christianity due to this made it that so later on today people are ashamed to be white and bow down to Browns invading their countries and turn into trannies.

Can you provide some scriptures that you believe proclaim that Whites are to bow down to Browns and accept population replacement? I'm fascinated by your perspective.

 

[jimbo]

For the most part, Due to our high-iqs yes. Majority of Christians are blacks also Christianity is a Semitic middle eastern religion

but atheists have the highest suicide rate out of any religion, so this leads me to believe that atheism is a jewish psyop meant to lead whites to nihilistic lifestyles and also suicide

 

[jimbo]

sense

nice esl

 

[jimbo]

I am Ubermenschen.

kek, doesn’t disprove any of what i said. not only are you unable to make a proper comeback, you’re also ESL (and probably a swarthoid irl). mad that God made you a shitskin?

 

[jimbo]

What? Also, Actual ESLTARD the correct spelling Is “Sense”

ad hominem, retort my prior argument

 

[jimbo]

and my only language i speak is English

well, you’re not doing a very good job at it, Mohammad.

then you.

than you* ESL retard

 

[_account]

Christianity helped to cause the destruction of the Roman Empire, The Vikings, Old Iberia, and now today modern white civilization.

Romans were faggot hedonists, vikings were violent savages no better than native Americans, and only Catholics are promoting niggers so your last statement is moot

 

[baqqrih]

I am Ubermenschen.

Christianity helped to cause the destruction of the Roman Empire, The Vikings, Old Iberia, and now today modern white civilization.

I asked for scriptures proving Christianity's clear hostility to the White race, not historical events. Not to mention, the Roman Empire continued for another 970 years in the east after the west's fall, as a bastion of, of all possible faiths, Christianity. And, to add one other comment, didn't the Vikings kill, rape, and butcher other White people? From my knowledge, they sound a lot like those non-native Blacks you mentioned earlier.