• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

Who wants to be friends?

>no true shitskin fallacy
Kek! Sad!
>true Scotsman or appeal to purity is an informal fallacy in which one modifies a prior claim in response to a counterexample by asserting the counterexample is excluded by definition
Can you substantiate how this applies to my arg?
 
RRGRGRGRGRGRRGHHHH THIS THREAD HAS DEVOLVED INTO MORE WARRIOR-Z SHITFLINGING GARBAGE I WILL BLOW UP THIS THREAD AND EVERYONE IN IT YOU HAVE 5 MINUTES TO LEAVE THIS THREAD BEFORE I EXPLODE AND BLOW ALL OF YOUR LIMBS OFF
1741871080361.png
 
Back
Top