• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

What do you think of Homosexuals?

Post thread
Cobbert said:
Phobia doesn't mean mental illness? It just means aversion, or fear rather. Which is absolutely a common trait people who hate gays have. They fear homosexuals internally.
Click to expand...
It CAN not mean mental illness in the the dictionary, (see stuff like hydrophobia). If you look at in a scientific sense such a moniker makes sense.
The foul play and well poisioning is in the clever use of words and popular cultural definitions to subconciously set the debate in your homecourt under your rules to tilt the scales in your favor before the debate even begins. This is one of the cultural marxist's favorite tools and is why cultural marxists attacked and conquered academia, to set the discussion by their own rules, because academia has been the esteemed and trusted arbiter of fact in the west since before the marxist incursion.

Back to homosexuality. In popular culture, "phobia" is predominantly associated with the psychological mental illness phobia, IE a ridiculous nonsensical fear of something that is often mostly harmless to the sufferer. Popular phobias are arachnophobia, the fear of spiders, and some other phobias I don't remember the name of, such as the fear of many holes next to eachother, the fear of needles, the fear of large groups, the fear of oceans, etc. All silly things that are often depicted as overblown. People tug on pop culture associations when thinking, so they are important. Cultural marxists know this.

So when the institutions of academia and the media successfully coined all disent towards the push for homosexuality as the scientific sounding "homophobia" and made it widely adopted by popular culture, it from then on subconciously framed any dissent to the lgbt push as stupid, silly, fearful, and mentally unwell, character assassinating their opposition before any debate even starts. This is wrong and deceptive because its poisoning the well, and on those principles alone, I already have problems with the lgbtq cultural push. That and other things mark it as part of the cultural marxist's subversion of western civilization. It sucks for the innocent homosexuals, but their plight is being used as a weapon to divide the people and make them easier to manage and conquer. In a war its easy for a soldier to hate his enemy, even though that hate is not deserved and your enemy is just fighting because he has to or feels like he has to.

Personally, I have a tendency not to like things I am forced to like and never insult at cultural gunpoint. This principle is part of what puts me off of lgbt, its forced, hard, and you can get culturally executed if you slight that community. It makes one think. "If it is good and just, why is it forced so hard, why am I punished for any semblence of dissent? Is there something more to this they are compensating for?" Apart from religious mandate I think this thought process is what puts many off of lgbt.
 
Pepsilord said:
You can say this because Alcohol is a relatively tame drug and allowing it doesn’t cause too many problems because most people will self regulate, but drugs like meth, crack, heroine and fentanyl are so dangerous and so addicting that relying on the self regulation of the people is not an option.

We tried that, they don’t care. If they can't play safe (ugh) then they can't play at all.

People like me are such a minority it’s not even funny anymore. The few Christian morals we still have are being watered down and ground away at as we speak.

The high HIV rates are probably aftershocks of the collapse of the Soviet Union. You can see the same trend with alcohol consumption. It spiked during and after the fall of the USSR

Again, they don’t do that.
Click to expand...
Do you have any source that they refuse to wear condoms? At all? You seem to just be saying that because you find them gross.
Do you think people just secretly did 100 times more gay sex when the soviet union collapsed or what? Why are you unable to prove any correlation between gay rights and AIDS rates?
And don’t pretend like you’re in the minority. Trump just won the election. There are countless of annoying e-christians all over social media. You are crybullying people whose existence does not impact in any shape or form.
Soynic Hedgehog said:
It CAN not mean mental illness in the the dictionary, (see stuff like hydrophobia). If you look at in a scientific sense such a moniker makes sense.
The foul play and well poisioning is in the clever use of words and popular cultural definitions to subconciously set the debate in your homecourt under your rules to tilt the scales in your favor before the debate even begins. This is one of the cultural marxist's favorite tools and is why cultural marxists attacked and conquered academia, to set the discussion by their own rules, because academia has been the esteemed and trusted arbiter of fact in the west since before the marxist incursion.

Back to homosexuality. In popular culture, "phobia" is predominantly associated with the psychological mental illness phobia, IE a ridiculous nonsensical fear of something that is often mostly harmless to the sufferer. Popular phobias are arachnophobia, the fear of spiders, and some other phobias I don't remember the name of, such as the fear of many holes next to eachother, the fear of needles, the fear of large groups, the fear of oceans, etc. All silly things that are often depicted as overblown. People tug on pop culture associations when thinking, so they are important. Cultural marxists know this.

So when the institutions of academia and the media successfully coined all disent towards the push for homosexuality as the scientific sounding "homophobia" and made it widely adopted by popular culture, it from then on subconciously framed any dissent to the lgbt push as stupid, silly, fearful, and mentally unwell, character assassinating their opposition before any debate even starts. This is wrong and deceptive because its poisoning the well, and on those principles alone, I already have problems with the lgbtq cultural push. That and other things mark it as part of the cultural marxist's subversion of western civilization. It sucks for the innocent homosexuals, but their plight is being used as a weapon to divide the people and make them easier to manage and conquer. In a war its easy for a soldier to hate his enemy, even though that hate is not deserved and your enemy is just fighting because he has to or feels like he has to.

Personally, I have a tendency not to like things I am forced to like and never insult at cultural gunpoint. This principle is part of what puts me off of lgbt, its forced, hard, and you can get culturally executed if you slight that community. It makes one think. "If it is good and just, why is it forced so hard, why am I punished for any semblence of dissent? Is there something more to this they are compensating for?" Apart from religious mandate I think this thought process is what puts many off of lgbt.
Click to expand...
>it from then on subconciously framed any dissent to the lgbt push as stupid, silly, fearful, and mentally unwell
But it is all of those things. There are no rational arguments against gays existing. You can’t have a level-headed discussion when it’s about "Should these people be treated with basic respect or not?"
Can you please specify what you’re being forced to do concerning gays? What do they make you do that you disagree with and why do you disagree with it?
 
Cobbert said:
Do you have any source that they refuse to wear condoms? At all? You seem to just be saying that because you find them gross.
Do you think people just secretly did 100 times more gay sex when the soviet union collapsed or what? Why are you unable to prove any correlation between gay rights and AIDS rates?
And don’t pretend like you’re in the minority. Trump just won the election. There are countless of annoying e-christians all over social media. You are crybullying people whose existence does not impact in any shape or form.

>it from then on subconciously framed any dissent to the lgbt push as stupid, silly, fearful, and mentally unwell
But it is all of those things. There are no rational arguments against gays existing. You can’t have a level-headed discussion when it’s about "Should these people be treated with basic respect or not?"
Can you please specify what you’re being forced to do concerning gays? What do they make you do that you disagree with and why do you disagree with it?
Click to expand...
It is in truth from the Dreams of a hundred men that the Great return of Sodom is coming endless hedonism, lust, and depravity abound
 
Cobbert said:
Do you have any source that they refuse to wear condoms? At all? You seem to just be saying that because you find them gross.
Do you think people just secretly did 100 times more gay sex when the soviet union collapsed or what? Why are you unable to prove any correlation between gay rights and AIDS rates?
And don’t pretend like you’re in the minority. Trump just won the election. There are countless of annoying e-christians all over social media. You are crybullying people whose existence does not impact in any shape or form.
Click to expand...
https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uplo...ut-many-do-not-use-them-regularly-polling.png
Here in Germany I am definitely in the minority.
As for America, it remains to be seen if homosexuality will be recriminalized.
 
hating faggots is inherently aryan case closed

aryanlook.gif
 
Pepsilord said:
https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uplo...ut-many-do-not-use-them-regularly-polling.png
Here in Germany I am definitely in the minority.
As for America, it remains to be seen if homosexuality will be recriminalized.
Click to expand...
The point is that gays aren't following christian rules because the religion hates them anyways. What does them being not as powerful anymore have to do with anything? They're still actively antagonizing gays and calling them rapists and pedophiles.
 
One of the biggest pseud traps is religious people trying to prove their religion's rulings by earthly reasons.

Nobody cares if homosexuals are 1000% more likely to molest kids and blow up buildings. It still doesn't follow from those facts that homosexuality is immoral.

This mindset of trying to prove the immorality of something purely from its temporal effects seems like a modern, utilitarian mindset. Moral claims can be purely ideal. For example blasphemy being wrong is purely based on justice, and not on any effect it may have on people's lives.

At most these kinds of statistics could support the idea of something being immoral. Because virtue and vice are self supporting. Bad things usually lead to more bad things. And good things usually lead to more good things.

You also see this with Muslims trying to argue why eating pork is prohibited. They will say stuff like 'pigs are disgusting' and 'pork is inhealthy', even though this is totally unnecessary.
 
I've only met 1 confirmed homosexual (or was it bisexual, I don't remember) in my entire life.

The guy was a degenerate even before puberty. And also I don't like him as a person. He's also a furry. Though I stopped seeing him years ago, so maybe he has changed.
 
AR47 said:
I've only met 1 confirmed homosexual (or was it bisexual, I don't know) in my entire life.

The guy was a degenerate even before puberty. And also I don't like him as a person. He's also a furry. Though I stopped seeing him years ago, so maybe he has changed.
Click to expand...
why are most furries homosexual?
 
Cobbert said:
Furries are generally pretty open to LGBT because they're already a relatively looked down upon minority. Basically homosexuals go "People will refuse to consider me normal, why act like it?" so they join fandoms like this
Click to expand...
No, i think there is some kind of subconscious thing in the homosexual mind that makes then connect with these Anthropomorphics
 
Last edited:
Back
Top