• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

What do (you) think of grifters?

Post thread
The grifters are kinda easy to spot tbh and I don't really think the term has any meaning. Generally, if you espouse safe, Redditoid opinions, you'll be able to make bank pretty easily as long as you're a good editor and whatnot. Tatefags are kinda the same thing except they take the opposite approach, espousing the most incoherent yet "out there" views as possible to get money from contrarians.
 
only 'grifter' i like is this guy
www.youtube.com

NUCLEAR GRIFTER

Detonating truth bombs.
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
unfortunately xhe was given t50s but i know there's a10s underneath [angry]
hes not necessarily a trve grifter because he doesn't shill anything
worried about race replacement and falling out of wypipo and faggots seeping into the us government or something i forgot but hes keyed
 
Blackpill of (American) Politics [but can be applied to other countries and cultures]:
It's all about contrarianism and grifting because of pendulum shifts and an everchanging cultural attitude.
1980s Republicans and conservatives were extremely anti-Soviet Union and anti-Russia as a result of the Cold War.
Modern Republicans now either feel neutral towards them, or actually support the war effort against Ukraine, because the Democrats have taken a Pro-Ukrainian stance. Ronald Reagan is rolling in his grave over this.

This is just one example, but you can literally apply this to anything, the uniparty will often switch sides on any given issue depending on what the current cultural climate dictates them to fill the role of.
The disturbing thing is that it doesn't just happen within a matter of decades, it can happen with the shift of a sitting president. People just automatically shift to the other side with a snap of a finger because an old shmuck gets inaugurated.
 
Ytsuken said:
Most of them are left wing, if not all of them
Click to expand...
That's probably because of the cancer of "social politics" rather than actual politics. HasanAbi doesn't know shit about shit, but because he's a good looking guy and repeats current left-wing talking points (social politics, not actual politics) people for some reason people kiss his ass. I don't get it.

This is the same guy who owns a 2-3M+ house in California, yet is also somehow a supposed socialist.
Not to mention if he's able to purchase a home that is worth nearly 3 million dollars, he has leftover revenue to upkeep and pay for all that comes with the house, including afterward, he's sitting on at least another two or three million at least.

He's not making the best out of the "system" that was put into the place, he's taking full advantage of the system he supposedly despises. I personally don't think there's anything wrong with it, but I think he is a liar and a hypocrite.
The copout answer would be to call him a "champagne socialist", the correct answer would be to call him a "crock of shit".
1740508332895.png


It's just like Bernie Sanders; he used to harp about millionaires, then he became a millionaire. Now he's harping about billionaires and he'll continue to do so until he becomes one himself, then he'll harp about trillionaires.

Bill Burr has also made recent jabs at billionaires despite being reported to have a net worth of 20 million. He claimed that Billionaires should be; "put down like fucking rabid dogs.".

I fucking hate these people so fucking much.
 
Back
Top