• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

Trvthnvke that will break /pol/clitties.

We both conquered the lands, and Christendom then prevailed after kicking Islam and the pagans out. What does this prove? I know this is simple bait, of course, but in the case that you actually think this is a good argument, I will still rebuke it so that a pleasant talk may come of this, like watering a dying tree back to good health so that it may still bear fruit. If I am to say that the Middle East is a Christian land (which it currently isn't), I am to also be wrong, because, while it was at once the heartland of Christ's teaching, it was then conquered by Muhammad's followers, and so now it is Muslim, just as Europe was once a jumble of paganism, Islam, and Christianity and was then eventually conquered by Christ's followers. So, would it not be similarly unfortunate for the Muslim lands if millions of Christians flooded the streets of Damascus, Baghdad, Riyadh, Cairo, Mecca, Medina, the West Bank, so on and so forth, and then claimed it to be their land again by saying that it once was well-over a millennia ago? Both are foolish assertions, don't you think?
 
Back
Top