• Site is being failraided (they're DOSing us and it's not working)
    >3000 guests while about 30 users are active

Trump or Harris?

Post thread
Namefag said:
Retard there was less illegal immigrant crime during Trump's presidency because there were less illegal immigrants in the first place plus they would actually get deported if they committed crimes. Ever since Harris made it a free for all there's literally tens of millions coming over here in hordes, some of which have the sole intention of commiting crimes. Cartels, fentanyl, terrorists, convicted rapists and murderers, all kinds of shit coming in completely unsupervised. Ask the original citizens of Springfield Ohio if orange man is that bad, and that's just one example
Click to expand...
1. You don't think there could have been less crime because there was a pandemic and a lockdown?
2. You just made those numbers up because you literally don't look into anything and you regurgitate talking points like an NPC.
3. The problem is not illegal immigration, it's the abuse of the asylum system which could have been largely solved with the border act bill that trump blocked.
 
Namefag said:
Harris made it a free for all there's literally tens of millions coming over here in hordes,
Click to expand...
didn’t trump literally deny a bill that would fund the border wall?
and harris is literally in charge of the countries around the border? not the border itself no?
 
@Mist Opinion on my banner?
street.jpg
 
MoonMetropolis said:
Kamala Harris will soundly defeat Trump this year, but, considering that Trump is a convicted felon and rapist who tried unsuccessfully to overthrow the government, that isn't exactly saying very much.
Click to expand...
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPP
 
Minuteman said:
I begrudgingly voted for Donnie yesterday at a local library. I know he's corrupt and probably senile, but I simply will not vote to make a woman the President of the United States. Much less a brown one.
Funny thing happened too: while I was getting in line, some lady asked me if she could "educate" me on the candidates. I said "no thanks" and while I was walking away, I noticed she was wearing a Kamala shirt. There is no way in Hell what she was doing was legal, and even if she had a Trump shirt I still would've been disgusted. Literally within 30 feet from the building entrance too.
Click to expand...
The fact that there are laws against "Electioneering Near Polls" is so comical. The fact that people are thought as so malleable and easily influenced that persuading people near a voting poll is considered "interference with the election process". Best part is it ain't wrong. People really are this retarded and they really do care so little that you can sway election changing number of votes by just camping voting booths and persuading people with any kind of bullshit. How can one defend democracy as reliable and effective while simultaneously justifying this absurd law?
 
Spasoje's Revenge said:
The fact that there are laws against "Electioneering Near Polls" is so comical. The fact that people are thought as so malleable and easily influenced that persuading people near a voting poll is considered "interference with the election process". Best part is it ain't wrong. People really are this retarded and they really do care so little that you can sway election changing number of votes by just camping voting booths and persuading people with any kind of bullshit. How can one defend democracy as reliable and effective while simultaneously justifying this absurd law?
Click to expand...
I think it's time to nuke the US.
 

Similar threads

Steve
Discussion Do you know anyone who takes Kamala Harris seriously?
5 6 7
Replies
138
Views
3K
Stephen
Stephen
Back
Top