The test sucks, but what else would you expect from a commercial outfit trying to essentially sell you on a book or expert (who totally can remember what they read in the book they read) to fix all your life problems? If you want to try out CBT just nab a book with libgen and therape yourself.
Is there anything that explains this in more detail?
I agree that they are massively overselling the applicability. The PTSD wikipedia article only says that 19% of rape victims get PTSD, so by that standard people getting traumatized from nothing should be pretty rare?
But, if anyone does go in for therapy CBT is the only therapy shown to do anything substantially better than just talking about your problems. Idk how huge of effect it is or even if the term has been repurposed since I looked into it. It used to mean forcing yourself to recognize a contradiction in your way of thinking through multiple sensory channels at once, in an effort to form a new neural connection to pre-empt another unwanted pathway. This aspect of it being a physical thing was quite compelling evidence to me, but maybe it shouldn't have been because I never looked into how they observed the generation of the detour and determined it was actually in use. It was also compelling that they focused on definite logical contradictions in examples, not some "people can heckin' love you for who you are!" cope and optimism.
The unwanted original neural pathway here would "trauma" or at least the physical origin of the issue. I don't think this critique is helpful because lots of people believe in shellshock-type PTSD. I think people call this other more questionable stuff "complex PTSD".
An axolotl is a pretty clever mascot with their indeterminate growth and being evolutionarily described as "peter pan" for something to do with their embryology or whatever you call it.