• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

Schizo The whole "Trusting science makes you a soyboy" thing is a psyop to undermine objective truth

Cobbert

2024 oldGOD
🏆
Joined
Feb 29, 2024
Messages
724
61945 - SoyBooru.png
There is literally nothing wrong with empiricism and it should be the basis of all reason. You can't decide something is true when you can't prove or disprove it.
This whole meme where believing in basic science makes you effeminate seems like an intentional attempt to destabilize western society. My best guess is it's either the CIA or Russians doing it.
Funny thing about the russians is they have a long history of denying basic science. Just look up Lysenkoism. They literally caused massive famines because russARYANs thought planting seeds apart from each other was evil capitalist science and couldn't be right. Even doe the evidence disproved it.
So yeah I really don't want this kind of attitude to catch on here too.
 
View attachment 105079
There is literally nothing wrong with empiricism and it should be the basis of all reason. You can't decide something is true when you can't prove or disprove it.
This whole meme where believing in basic science makes you effeminate seems like an intentional attempt to destabilize western society. My best guess is it's either the CIA or Russians doing it.
Funny thing about the russians is they have a long history of denying basic science. Just look up Lysenkoism. They literally caused massive famines because russARYANs thought planting seeds apart from each other was evil capitalist science and couldn't be right. Even doe the evidence disproved it.
So yeah I really don't want this kind of attitude to catch on here too.
LQbait.png
 
View attachment 105079
There is literally nothing wrong with empiricism and it should be the basis of all reason. You can't decide something is true when you can't prove or disprove it.
This whole meme where believing in basic science makes you effeminate seems like an intentional attempt to destabilize western society. My best guess is it's either the CIA or Russians doing it.
Funny thing about the russians is they have a long history of denying basic science. Just look up Lysenkoism. They literally caused massive famines because russARYANs thought planting seeds apart from each other was evil capitalist science and couldn't be right. Even doe the evidence disproved it.
So yeah I really don't want this kind of attitude to catch on here too.
Post this on 4cuck /pol/ i want to see their reactions
 
Empiricism is the basis of all technological progress and is the reason you're sitting in front of a computer and not inside a cave. I wouldn't consider that losing.

No it's not.
Can you even imagine? Way back in the past when
 
I got rangebanned from there after I posted a dox of one of their jannies

>No arguments
As expected
Storms were caused by petty gods fighting on top of the mountain, and yeah i like a good story but eventually it's gonna bore me when it doesn't have that truth
 
View attachment 105079
There is literally nothing wrong with empiricism and it should be the basis of all reason. You can't decide something is true when you can't prove or disprove it.
This whole meme where believing in basic science makes you effeminate seems like an intentional attempt to destabilize western society. My best guess is it's either the CIA or Russians doing it.
Funny thing about the russians is they have a long history of denying basic science. Just look up Lysenkoism. They literally caused massive famines because russARYANs thought planting seeds apart from each other was evil capitalist science and couldn't be right. Even doe the evidence disproved it.
So yeah I really don't want this kind of attitude to catch on here too.
absolute trvke, you shouldn't believe anything that is not purely based on empiricism and reason
 
empiricism isnt the problem, it's the peer-review (academic circlejerking), reproduction crisis and the closed datasets researchers use.

All peer-review is doing is incentivizing forming cartels with other academics so everyone gets published regardless of quality.
None of them are interested in reproducing studies or verifying results, because that doesn't get you funding.
Lastly all actual data, the empirical facts, are completely inaccessible, even for other academics. There have been several scandals where peer-reviewed, lauded studies turned out to have used fraudulent data. The "science" has used these "studies" and its' "facts" to produce alzheimers medication for 20 years.
The vast majority of academics fail at the basic statistics necessary to determine if results are normative at all.

the basis of the scientific community is academic, federal and private funding, not empirical fact
 
empiricism isnt the problem, it's the peer-review (academic circlejerking), reproduction crisis and the closed datasets researchers use.

All peer-review is doing is incentivizing forming cartels with other academics so everyone gets published regardless of quality.
None of them are interested in reproducing studies or verifying results, because that doesn't get you funding.
Lastly all actual data, the empirical facts, are completely inaccessible, even for other academics. There have been several scandals where peer-reviewed, lauded studies turned out to have used fraudulent data. The "science" has used these "studies" and its' "facts" to produce alzheimers medication for 20 years.
The vast majority of academics fail at the basic statistics necessary to determine if results are normative at all.

the basis of the scientific community is academic, federal and private funding, not empirical fact
This should be proof that we should work towards improving scientific work and not abandon it as a whole albeit
 
Back
Top