The two faces of multiculturalism

[Mooney]

While some would say it can be like this:

For the most part, It‘s actually like this:

 

[MoonMetropolis]

If the tensions around the world surrounding the Middle-East conflict have demonstrated anything, they have demonstrated, once again, the complete and total failure of multiculturalism. We're always told that diversity is our strength, but, in all of human history, diversity has never been anything other than a problem. The more diversity you have, the less social cohesion you have. When you have multiple wildly incompatible cultures living in the same area, then you have a powder keg like what we're currently seeing all over the west right now. Multiculturalism is fundamentally incompatible with human nature. Human beings are racist by nature and human beings, by nature, are distrustful of people who aren't like them. That's not the way that it should be, but that's the way that it is and that's the way that it will always be. Human nature is not something that can be changed, and trying to force human nature to change always results in complete disaster. The only real purpose of multiculturalism is to create an unlimited labor pool for multinational corporations, but is that even remotely worth all of the problems that come with it? No, of course not. There are absolutely no real benefits to multiculturalism whatsoever and, whenever proponents of multiculturalism are asked to name some benefits of it, they can never come up with anything other than food and music.

You can either have multiculturalism or you can have social cohesion. Pick one and only one.

 

[UendeligKamp]

That's not the way that it should be, but that's the way that it is and that's the way that it will always be. Human nature is not something that can be changed

This part was the only thing I didn't like/agree with here. The phrasing of should, to me what matters is what is and adapting to that in preferably simple workable solutions. As for if it can be changed or not I do not know I view humans as seperate from animals because my understanding at present is that we are somewhere inbetween nature and nurture. What I mean by that is we are pulled by forces in two opposite directions our animal nature and what I called nurture here, the world of ideas we have constructed for ourselves this civilizing project of mankind this accumilation of knowledge and collective consciousness. As for if our nature will remain the same or change in ways only evolution and what we are selecting for will show the results in the far far future.

 

[NigKiller_Tojo]

If the tensions around the world surrounding the Middle-East conflict have demonstrated anything, they have demonstrated, once again, the complete and total failure of multiculturalism. We're always told that diversity is our strength, but, in all of human history, diversity has never been anything other than a problem. The more diversity you have, the less social cohesion you have. When you have multiple wildly incompatible cultures living in the same area, then you have a powder keg like what we're currently seeing all over the west right now. Multiculturalism is fundamentally incompatible with human nature. Human beings are racist by nature and human beings, by nature, are distrustful of people who aren't like them. That's not the way that it should be, but that's the way that it is and that's the way that it will always be. Human nature is not something that can be changed, and trying to force human nature to change always results in complete disaster. The only real purpose of multiculturalism is to create an unlimited labor pool for multinational corporations, but is that even remotely worth all of the problems that come with it? No, of course not. There are absolutely no real benefits to multiculturalism whatsoever and, whenever proponents of multiculturalism are asked to name some benefits of it, they can never come up with anything other than food and music.

You can either have multiculturalism or you can have social cohesion. Pick one and only one.

you kikes are the ones dumping trillions of subhuman waste into civilized nations to destroy society. your kind is disgusting and evil.

 

[UendeligKamp]

you kikes are the ones dumping trillions of subhuman waste into civilized nations to destroy society. your kind is disgusting and evil.

kikes won, also he isn't a jew he is just kinda jew-ish badumtss Herr.Goldberg

 

[Catter]

If the tensions around the world surrounding the Middle-East conflict have demonstrated anything, they have demonstrated, once again, the complete and total failure of multiculturalism. We're always told that diversity is our strength, but, in all of human history, diversity has never been anything other than a problem. The more diversity you have, the less social cohesion you have. When you have multiple wildly incompatible cultures living in the same area, then you have a powder keg like what we're currently seeing all over the west right now. Multiculturalism is fundamentally incompatible with human nature. Human beings are racist by nature and human beings, by nature, are distrustful of people who aren't like them. That's not the way that it should be, but that's the way that it is and that's the way that it will always be. Human nature is not something that can be changed, and trying to force human nature to change always results in complete disaster. The only real purpose of multiculturalism is to create an unlimited labor pool for multinational corporations, but is that even remotely worth all of the problems that come with it? No, of course not. There are absolutely no real benefits to multiculturalism whatsoever and, whenever proponents of multiculturalism are asked to name some benefits of it, they can never come up with anything other than food and music.

You can either have multiculturalism or you can have social cohesion. Pick one and only one.

marge is this Jew broken

 

[Gigafly]

If the tensions around the world surrounding the Middle-East conflict have demonstrated anything, they have demonstrated, once again, the complete and total failure of multiculturalism. We're always told that diversity is our strength, but, in all of human history, diversity has never been anything other than a problem. The more diversity you have, the less social cohesion you have. When you have multiple wildly incompatible cultures living in the same area, then you have a powder keg like what we're currently seeing all over the west right now. Multiculturalism is fundamentally incompatible with human nature. Human beings are racist by nature and human beings, by nature, are distrustful of people who aren't like them. That's not the way that it should be, but that's the way that it is and that's the way that it will always be. Human nature is not something that can be changed, and trying to force human nature to change always results in complete disaster. The only real purpose of multiculturalism is to create an unlimited labor pool for multinational corporations, but is that even remotely worth all of the problems that come with it? No, of course not. There are absolutely no real benefits to multiculturalism whatsoever and, whenever proponents of multiculturalism are asked to name some benefits of it, they can never come up with anything other than food and music.

You can either have multiculturalism or you can have social cohesion. Pick one and only one.

Liberalnigger nonsense. Human "nature" only exists as a result of social relations, it can be molded to however the burghers desire.

 

[KingCargo]

If the tensions around the world surrounding the Middle-East conflict have demonstrated anything, they have demonstrated, once again, the complete and total failure of multiculturalism. We're always told that diversity is our strength, but, in all of human history, diversity has never been anything other than a problem. The more diversity you have, the less social cohesion you have. When you have multiple wildly incompatible cultures living in the same area, then you have a powder keg like what we're currently seeing all over the west right now. Multiculturalism is fundamentally incompatible with human nature. Human beings are racist by nature and human beings, by nature, are distrustful of people who aren't like them. That's not the way that it should be, but that's the way that it is and that's the way that it will always be. Human nature is not something that can be changed, and trying to force human nature to change always results in complete disaster. The only real purpose of multiculturalism is to create an unlimited labor pool for multinational corporations, but is that even remotely worth all of the problems that come with it? No, of course not. There are absolutely no real benefits to multiculturalism whatsoever and, whenever proponents of multiculturalism are asked to name some benefits of it, they can never come up with anything other than food and music.

You can either have multiculturalism or you can have social cohesion. Pick one and only one.

[ Content Deleted ]

 

[KingCargo]

[ Content Deleted ]
View attachment 171828

Kill yourself obsessed nigger of a janny.

 

[Gigafly]

Kill yourself obsessed nigger of a janny.
View attachment 171862

can you DM me xit it was very funny

 

[𝗠𝗞𝗖]

If the tensions around the world surrounding the Middle-East conflict have demonstrated anything, they have demonstrated, once again, the complete and total failure of multiculturalism. We're always told that diversity is our strength, but, in all of human history, diversity has never been anything other than a problem. The more diversity you have, the less social cohesion you have. When you have multiple wildly incompatible cultures living in the same area, then you have a powder keg like what we're currently seeing all over the west right now. Multiculturalism is fundamentally incompatible with human nature. Human beings are racist by nature and human beings, by nature, are distrustful of people who aren't like them. That's not the way that it should be, but that's the way that it is and that's the way that it will always be. Human nature is not something that can be changed, and trying to force human nature to change always results in complete disaster. The only real purpose of multiculturalism is to create an unlimited labor pool for multinational corporations, but is that even remotely worth all of the problems that come with it? No, of course not. There are absolutely no real benefits to multiculturalism whatsoever and, whenever proponents of multiculturalism are asked to name some benefits of it, they can never come up with anything other than food and music.

You can either have multiculturalism or you can have social cohesion. Pick one and only one.

If there is a God i wonder why he made these "cannon fodder" (for a lack of a better term) types of human beings.

 

[Neal]

Liberalnigger nonsense. Human "nature" only exists as a result of social relations, it can be molded to however the burghers desire.

 

[Gigafly]

View attachment 171866

He wrote a wordswordswords reply much longer than my response

 

[Neal]

He wrote a wordswordswords reply much longer than my response