Hell The Landfill: Derailments Found Here!

[Warrior-Z]

You yourself said that omnipotence isn't above the laws of logic so are you backpedaling now or is it not "ANYTHING"? In my opinion God could make 2+2 = 5 but you disagree?

I disagree on that. I said anything logically possible so that's NOT backtracking, are you dumb?

Why does that nigger need to test us if he's truely omniscient?

That's not even the test, the TEST IS IN FAITH.

Can't he tell if we love him?

Yes, he can, that's why he tests us.

Again, that makes me think of dystheism, that he wants us to simp for him cause he's a narcissistic nigger who likes seeing people who like him suffer.

That's presupposing God's psychology and that he "likes" it and that it's not a test in order to review if your believers would STILL believe even after pain.

 

[MeursaultLE]

I am not baiting I am curious

>curious
what's with these questions? for the past hours or so you've been asking these gay question about being a foid.
enough is enough
get on the rope

 

[SUPERCELLEX]

Me and Terry presupposed that the monotheistic God is a necessary being so that isn't applicable right now.

I never agreed to this. In my opening statement I said polytheism makes more sense

 

[jimbo]

No we are debating if Warrior-Z, if he was a woman, would marry Kratos or not

if i was a woman i would

 

[terrycrews]

I disagree on that. I said anything logically possible so that's NOT backtracking, are you dumb?

No you said anything, you didn't qualify it with 'logically'. Not that it matters because having a universal level of omnipotence over a universe is very much in the power of God because he can do anything (logically). So why can't he make the Kratos universe again?

 

[Warrior-Z]

I never agreed to this. In my opening statement I said polytheism makes more sense

Can you read? I said ME AND TERRY, not ME AND YOU.

 

[terrycrews]

if i was a woman i would

I wouldn't because he has an ugly face

 

[Warrior-Z]

No you said anything

Why do I need to say logically all the time if I already said I think omnipotence is logical or that God cant break the laws of logic?

So why can't he make the Kratos universe again?

Because it's simply not logical within YOUR framework because you can't even substantiate how Kratos even would be Kratos without the events taking place which requires another cosmology.

 

[SUPERCELLEX]

That's not even the test, the TEST IS IN FAITH.

Yes, he can, that's why he tests us.

That's presupposing God's psychology and that he "likes" it and that it's not a test in order to review if your believers would STILL believe even after pain.

Why does he care about our faith so much anyways? If he really does he can just reach into our minds and play out the simulation without torturing people
Makes much more sense that gods are just beings that emerged from the world and have a certain level of influence over it

 

[terrycrews]

Because it's simply not logical within YOUR framework because you can't even substantiate how Kratos even would be Kratos without the events taking place which requires another cosmology.

Well let's just say that God can break the laws of logic, hypothetically. Does that solve this issue for you?

 

[Warrior-Z]

Why does he care about our faith so much anyways?

Because we're his creation and he's all-loving?

If he really does he can just reach into our minds and play out the simulation without torturing people

Then that just defeats the purpose of a test?

Makes much more sense that gods are just beings that emerged from the world and have a certain level of influence over it

That would make them the assholes according to r/amitheasshole. Also all polytheistic debaters ABSOLUTELY SUCK!

 

[jimbo]

I wouldn't because he has an ugly face

but he’s strong so he could help me with anything

 

[Warrior-Z]

Well let's just say that God can break the laws of logic, hypothetically. Does that solve this issue for you?

NO IT DOESN'T, WE CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE SOMETHING ILLOGICAL CAN'T BE HYPOTHETICAL BECAUSE WE CANT IMAGINE P AND NOT P.

 

[jimbo]

Also all polytheistic debaters ABSOLUTELY SUCK!

erm, you can’t just assume ALL polytheistic debaters suck just because you might’ve heard some faulty arguments from SOME of them; that’s a fallacy sweatie…

 

[Warrior-Z]

erm, you can’t just assume ALL polytheistic debaters suck just because you might’ve heard some faulty arguments from SOME of them; that’s a fallacy sweatie…

That was rhetorical.

 

[Warrior-Z]

I think the p and not p argument stunlocked Terry.

 

[terrycrews]

NO IT DOESN'T, WE CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE SOMETHING ILLOGICAL CAN'T BE HYPOTHETICAL BECAUSE WE CANT IMAGINE P AND NOT P.
View attachment 107086

If you can imagine it then you can create it into a hypothetical. Do you have no imagination?

 

[Warrior-Z]

If you can imagine it then you can create it into a hypothetical.

No you can't. Can you imagine a ball that's red and not red at the same time?

 

[terrycrews]

No you can't. Can you imagine a ball that's red and not red at the same time?

Colors are irrelevant because there are animals who can see far more colors than ours so it has nothing to do with logic. God could create a red and non red ball at the same time though yeah

 

[Warrior-Z]

Colors are irrelevant because there are animals who can see far more colors than ours

It doesn't matter because there's no contradiction with new colours, I'm talking about something that basically IS RED AND NOT RED, WHICH IS AN INHERENT CONTRADICTION. And yes it is relevant because we speak of contradictions. Also prove that God could create that.