• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

Hell The Landfill: Derailments Found Here!

>This is the power of being a LowFap Titan
Nocturnal emissions are annoying but ultimately fine. If you don't like having to wash your sheets two-three times a week, maybe it's a sign you should be dating.
Say, given the hypergamy of the dating scene, a man can only get a woman who does not looksmatch him ex: a fat chick. Obviously, to let an obesenik siphon his seed is extremely damaging to his pride and honor. Do you think it is superior for him to have sex with this girl or to masturbate once every week or two? Both are sins
 
ximmie grant have you ever yoinked it to furries
0msfkv.png
 
And yet it's not harmful, so it's still not an addiction
How is it not harmful? Pornography usage distorts our views on attractiveness (see "Men and masculine 'attractiveness'" and "Women and self-consciousness", Wikipedia subsection), creating impossible standards. It also lowers our critical thinking skills (see "Cognitive effects", Wikipedia section), and desensitizes us to dopamine (see "Studies and evidence of effects", wikipedia subsection).
 
I think you have circular reasoning. There's a point where it becomes harmful, can you prove I've reached it? No. I like women the same way I liked them before porn, I have gotten aroused when me and a girlfriend were getting intimate, like a kiss.
I do not believe addictions have to be harmful; I am just entertaining your argument. How do I have circular reasoning? And how do you know you like women the same way? How do you know you haven't changed? There is no "point where it becomes harmful", it happens over time.
 
Back
Top