The faces of the 'sphere

[alonso]

Spoiler: Jannycaca

View attachment 171633

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS, THIS NIGGA'S GOONING TO ((YOU)) UNIRONICALLY, BAN HIM NOW

 

[baqqrih]

MARGE he did that?

Yeah, I checked, and to my disappointment, I'm correct. It was back in May.

If X immigrant was still here, He'll make 14NateHiggers88 his rival

He complimented Nate's ding-dong in the thread that it was posted it in.

 

[Itransheartblox]

Spoiler: Jannycaca

View attachment 171633

 

[alonso]

Yeah, I checked, and to my disappointment, I'm correct. It was back in May.

He complimented Nate's ding-dong in the thread that it was posted it in.
View attachment 171635

Another missed Red herring

 

[SoySpotter]

He complimented Nate's ding-dong in the thread that it was posted it in.
View attachment 171635

What?

 

[14NateHiggers88]

ts nigga is posting soyjak janny porn in a different thread who revived him?

Yeah, I checked, and to my disappointment, I'm correct. It was back in May.

He complimented Nate's ding-dong in the thread that it was posted it in.
View attachment 171635

Lmaooooooo
Can I get a certified BWC badge o algo????

 

[baqqrih]

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS, THIS NIGGA'S GOONING TO ((YOU)) UNIRONICALLY, BAN HIM NOW

Cartoonish sexual soyjak content (as long as it isn't utterly pornographic) hasn't ever been against our rules. The Rapeson posts are usually the "line of judgement" for that, so if it's worse than a drawing of an absurdly-grotesque penis then it's a candidate for deletion. This post in particular doesn't really cross that line, as painful to your eyes as it may be.

 

[Itransheartblox]

Yeah, I checked, and to my disappointment, I'm correct. It was back in May.

He complimented Nate's ding-dong in the thread that it was posted it in.
View attachment 171635

>BWC

 

[Catter]

Cartoonish sexual soyjak content (as long as it isn't utterly pornographic) hasn't ever been against our rules. The Rapeson posts are usually the "line of judgement" for that, so if it's worse than a drawing of an absurdly-grotesque penis then it's a candidate for deletion. This post in particular doesn't really cross that line, as painful to your eyes as it may be.

how about this one https://blog.soyjak.st/threads/why-is-everyone-gooning-to-admins.16442/post-685393

 

[baqqrih]

how about this one https://blog.soyjak.st/threads/why-is-everyone-gooning-to-admins.16442/post-685393

Yeeeaah I might delete that one

 

[Itransheartblox]

how about this one https://blog.soyjak.st/threads/why-is-everyone-gooning-to-admins.16442/post-685393

 

[14NateHiggers88]

Cartoonish sexual soyjak content (as long as it isn't utterly pornographic) hasn't ever been against our rules. The Rapeson posts are usually the "line of judgement" for that, so if it's worse than a drawing of an absurdly-grotesque penis then it's a candidate for deletion. This post in particular doesn't really cross that line, as painful to your eyes as it may be.

I joined 2 days before you, can I get mod?

 

[SoySpotter]

how about this one https://blog.soyjak.st/threads/why-is-everyone-gooning-to-admins.16442/post-685393

what was it?

 

[baqqrih]

I joined 2 days before you, can I get mod?

Konata joined before either of us. Account age isn't a very good indicator of moderation capability.

 

[baqqrih]

what was it?

Kuz sodomizing Soot.

 

[alonso]

I joined 2 days before you, can I get mod?

X immigrant's successor

 

[14NateHiggers88]

Konata joined before either of us. Account age isn't a very good indicator of moderation capability.

 

[14NateHiggers88]

Kuz sodomizing Soot.

What is the moderation policy regarding things that are on the soybooru? I'll be serious for this one, I haven't been on this site for a long time.

 

[baqqrih]

What is the moderation policy regarding things that are on the soybooru? I'll be serious for this one, I haven't been on this site for a long time.

Some things on the 'ru itself are explicitly pornographic and those are the things we'll delete (but not ban for unless you continually post them). As I said, just follow the "Rapeson rule." If it's more grotesquely sexual than his lower half, it's best you don't post it. This includes realistic depictions of coitus.

 

[14NateHiggers88]

Some things on the 'ru itself are explicitly pornographic and those are the things we'll delete (but not ban for unless you continually post them). As I said, just follow the "Rapeson rule." If it's more grotesquely sexual than his lower half, it's best you don't post it. This includes realistic depictions of coitus.

You mean like this?