• Site is being failraided (they're DOSing us and it's not working)
    >3000 guests while about 30 users are active

Texas made lolicon a felony

Nobody, because they're banned.

I never did. I don't know what the fuck you're referring to so I'm assuming it was because I called it 'P. It's literally 'P by definition. The only thing the US of A enforces is CSAM which they said it isn't. If you're forced to never call that shit 'P then lolicon wouldn't be 'P EV&OE IT IS. This is what I mean by 2+2=5 because by the very definition of the two words, child (anything to do with kids), and porn (anything pornographic (Containing an explicit depiction of sexual activity or Depicting something in detail, usually unnecessarily)), is what these shit is. Prohibiting me from labeling something as such even though it literally makes sense, is literally newspeak and distorting reality

I literally don't know what arcane law you speak of that I tried to invoke. Maybe it's rule 2, something literally arcane to Chudborean and Ytsuken I guess
Don't argue with me about this, argue this with the supreme court of US of A, I've told you idk how many times that I think that the image is obscene and should be considered 'p and purged from internet. I am arguing a technicality as was U:R.
this is not something to be defending its child porn
Where was I defending CP? Bruh.
 
xitter immigrant.png
 
why would you ever trust a kike to do anything right? they are demons built off of pure evil
thought he'd have at least a little common sense. @MoonMetropolis seriously man i thought you hated pedophiles why do you enable this kind of stuff under the premise of "it doesn't hurt anyone"
 
God I'm not even mad this is just disappointing some of you niggas are so fucking dumb stop using US law to determine your morals
zoophile porn is legal in almost all 50 states. is zoophile porn cool now? that's fine? some of you have no real moral compass and it shows
 
thought he'd have at least a little common sense. @MoonMetropolis seriously man i thought you hated pedophiles why do you enable this kind of stuff under the premise of "it doesn't hurt anyone"
it's a fucking kike. they're all morally deficient and evil. the fat criminal kike is particularly bad, not only is xe a total retard that makes bomb threats for no reason and goes to jail for it, xe incessantly defends degenerate jew garbage like faggotry, trannies, and 'p on this site.
 
Last edited:
God I'm not even mad this is just disappointing some of you niggas are so fucking dumb stop using US law to determine your morals
zoophile porn is legal in almost all 50 states. is zoophile porn cool now? that's fine? some of you have no real moral compass and it shows
As previously stated, the authority of the constitution means nothing to me if it's being misused.
 
God I'm not even mad this is just disappointing some of you niggas are so fucking dumb stop using US law to determine your morals
zoophile porn is legal in almost all 50 states. is zoophile porn cool now? that's fine? some of you have no real moral compass and it shows
No one here is arguing about morality, we all agree that it's immoral. We're arguing about definitions. No one here is defending 'p.
 
No one here is arguing about morality, we all agree that it's immoral. We're arguing about definitions. No one here is defending 'p.
what ytsuken posted was child porn. it's a child, a naked child, posing in a sexual manner. that is porn. that is child porn. it is a child, in porn. shocker. legally its protected as "artistic expression" but nobody is believing that.
 
Okay so I see a nigger saying this is a bad thing. I know he's retarded and also thought Soylita was the most "pleasant" soyjak to look at even though soyjaks are meant to be grostesque and mock numales but I digress. This law should've been done before. Free speech my ass because you can already get imprisoned for free speech if it doesn't suit the US government.

@MoonMetropolis, by your logic, AI CP is fine because it harms no one. You are a stupid nigger. Pedophilia is what's harming kids in the first place. Lolicon is creating demand for the actual thing because pedophiles do move up to the real thing. Your view of ethics is so flawed you see things one dimensionally instead of understanding cause and effect.

This will never affect the average citizen at all, so I don't see the issue with this. I don't see why you have a problem with this law, or why you think there's a slippery slope when in reality nothing happens after lolicon gets banned. Why are you fearmongering and why are you pretending the US won't just put you on a watchlist or even revoke your citizenship because of the patriot act? If anything I would rather the government be obsessed with obscenity laws than silencing political dissidents


Yes. Because the whole reason kids get sexually abused is because of pedophilia. Pedophiles enable other pedophiles. Remember NAMBLA? Everyone made a big deal over it.. But I thought... Oh my god I thought saying you want to molest kids is... FREE SPEECH!!!!

This law would also force platforms to start banning these freaks. It's not like the government will immediately focus all of their resources of lolicon. It just makes it illegal to have in the same way weed is or alcohol during the prohibition. It essentially removes the whole "it's legal" argument from those pedophiles


The album cover is way worse. The pedophiles were trying to tip toe on the red line really bad and it backfired around the world except the US


Lolicon is the equivalent of smoking advertisers that target kids. It will generate demand for the real because pedophiles like kids, whether real or fictional. It's being proactive rather than reactive
First off, there really isn't anyone on here who goes after pedophiles harder than I do. Not a single other user ITT has ever done anything to actually shut down pedophiles. I have, and I still do on a regular basis. That's the #1 thing that I was known for in prison. I do not fuck with pedophiles, and I make that very much known.

Every single bit of time and energy spent on going after lolicon is time and energy that could be spent going after ACTUAL CHILD ABUSE, and it is a complete waste of time and resources. There is also zero evidence that lolicon has ever resulted in higher rates of crimes against real children - quite the contrary, in fact. Rates of child abuse in Japan have actually gone down as the proliferation of lolicon there has increased. If pedophiles are whacking it to cartoons, they are much less likely to go after real children. And, if someone is a pedophile, I would certainly much rather that they live out their sick fantasies through cartoons than through genuine child abuse.

Checks and balances on the legal system exist for a reason. You cannot arrest someone simply for saying "I am a pedophile". They have to actually commit a crime against children in order to be arrested. That's why it's legal for organizations like NAMBLA and Prostasia to exist. The First Amendment protects their speech, as vile and disgusting and unpopular as it is.

Last I checked, the US government is not silencing political dissidents, but giving the US government greater power to censor speech in the name of fighting pedophiles (or anyone else) will inevitably lead to silencing of dissidents, because any censorship power granted to any government is always 100% guaranteed to be abused.

If we are going to ban fiction because it supposedly leads to crimes, then where do we stop? By that logic, we should also ban gangsta rap because it supposedly creates demand for gang-banging. Gangsta rap is vile too, but it's still fiction and it's still protected by the First Amendment. Should we also ban violent video games because they supposedly cause mass shootings? Because that's the road that you're going down by treating cartoons as if they are the equivalent of actual CSAM. They are not. They are pure fiction - disgusting fiction, yes, but still fiction.
 
what ytsuken posted was child porn. it's a child, a naked child, posing in a sexual manner. that is porn. that is child porn. it is a child, in porn. shocker. legally its protected as "artistic expression" but nobody is believing that.
Take that with the supreme court of your country. My point is that Ytsuken was a retard, but all of you are dogpiling him as some sort of a monster is wrong. I think he is simple minded and doesn't deserve the label, as, IN MY OPINION, he was just tying to show how fucked up wikipedia is and U:R and basil got holed for taking a stand on the freeze peach hill.
 
Take that with the supreme court of your country. My point is that Ytsuken was a retard, but all of you are dogpiling him as some sort of a monster is wrong. I think he is simple minded and doesn't deserve the label, as, IN MY OPINION, he was just tying to show how fucked up wikipedia is and U:R and basil got holed for taking a stand on the freeze peach hill.
Ytsuken could have just said the name of the album but he didn't, he was testing the waters. You'd better shut up or your going to end up with Basil.
 
Take that with the supreme court of your country. My point is that Ytsuken was a retard, but all of you are dogpiling him as some sort of a monster is wrong. I think he is simple minded and doesn't deserve the label, as, IN MY OPINION, he was just tying to show how fucked up wikipedia is and U:R and basil got holed for taking a stand on the freeze peach hill.
mutt baby.png

hold up basils banned AGAIN?
 
First off, there really isn't anyone on here who goes after pedophiles harder than I do. Not a single other user ITT has ever done anything to actually shut down pedophiles. I have, and I still do on a regular basis. That's the #1 thing that I was known for in prison. I do not fuck with pedophiles, and I make that very much known.

Every single bit of time and energy spent on going after lolicon is time and energy that could be spent going after ACTUAL CHILD ABUSE, and it is a complete waste of time and resources. There is also zero evidence that lolicon has ever resulted in higher rates of crimes against real children - quite the contrary, in fact. Rates of child abuse in Japan have actually gone down as the proliferation of lolicon there has increased. If pedophiles are whacking it to cartoons, they are much less likely to go after real children. And, if someone is a pedophile, I would certainly much rather that they live out their sick fantasies through cartoons than through genuine child abuse.

Checks and balances on the legal system exist for a reason. You cannot arrest someone simply for saying "I am a pedophile". They have to actually commit a crime against children in order to be arrested. That's why it's legal for organizations like NAMBLA and Prostasia to exist. The First Amendment protects their speech, as vile and disgusting and unpopular as it is.

Last I checked, the US government is not silencing political dissidents, but giving the US government greater power to censor speech in the name of fighting pedophiles (or anyone else) will inevitably lead to silencing of dissidents, because any censorship power granted to any government is always 100% guaranteed to be abused.

If we are going to ban fiction because it supposedly leads to crimes, then where do we stop? By that logic, we should also ban gangsta rap because it supposedly creates demand for gang-banging. Gangsta rap is vile too, but it's still fiction and it's still protected by the First Amendment. Should we also ban violent video games because they supposedly cause mass shootings? Because that's the road that you're going down by treating cartoons as if they are the equivalent of actual CSAM. They are not. They are pure fiction - disgusting fiction, yes, but still fiction.
kill yourself vile kike. you have no idea what you are talking about
>Rates of child abuse in Japan have actually gone down as the proliferation of lolicon there has increased
this kike is actually insane. not only is this not true (crime rates were already low and are low), are you seriously arguing for the proliferation of drawn 'p as a good? mask off moment, but unsurprising coming from a kike. really revealing the true, twisted nature of a jew.
 
Back
Top