Texas made lolicon a felony

[ribbon]

Yes.
View attachment 164204

He said that 5 times. We said we don't care. The fact even skayjos said it's 'p says a lot about this shit. It's 'P and it got classed as such. Being adamant about legality is literal pedophile behavior. I lied about not having just cause to ban him because I was trying to send a message to him that he needs to shut the fuck up instead of being a contrarian nigger like Incelibatepsycho who ended up banned for something similar

Broot permanently banned him until it got lowered to 1 week over his post in the hole so clearly I'm not the one being delusional about this bullshit

i know moon makes active efforts to get pedophiles taken down and shit i think hes too set on being heckin anti censorship in this one or whatever

 

[bowl]

nux taku is the most annoying nigger ever i hope him a rev says sude both die just because of how much they pmo

i cannot stand vtumors because they all have a shrill as hell voice or sound really annoying. they are just facecammers with extra steps

 

[meijak]

Yes.
View attachment 164204

He said that 5 times. We said we don't care. The fact even skayjos said it's 'p says a lot about this shit. It's 'P and it got classed as such. Being adamant about legality is literal pedophile behavior. I lied about not having just cause to ban him because I was trying to send a message to him that he needs to shut the fuck up instead of being a contrarian nigger like Incelibatepsycho who ended up banned for something similar

Broot permanently banned him until it got lowered to 1 week over his post in the hole so clearly I'm not the one being delusional about this bullshit

He said what 5 times? That it's not against the US law? Well, he was right 5 times? He didn't link the wikipedia image, nor did he say it was okay to do so, he just argued against you saying that it's 'p in accordance with US law. This shouldn't even be an argument, because whatever the image is, no one should be posting nudity on a forum with children on it.

 

[_account]

He said what 5 times? That it's not against the US law? Well, he was right 5 times? He didn't link the wikipedia image, nor did he say it was okay to do so, he just argued against you saying that it's 'p in accordance with US law. This shouldn't even be an argument, because whatever the image is, no one should be posting nudity on a forum with children on it.

Read the room buddy

 

[NigKiller_Tojo]

Lolicon, while vile and repulsive, is not a matter for law enforcement since it does not involve harm to actual children, and criminalizing any cartoons - regardless of what they depict - sets an extremely dangerous precedent with massive potential for abuse. If you're criminalizing cartoon depictions of sexual situations involving children, then you're potentially opening up the door for certain episodes of South Park to be criminalized. On top of that, there is absolutely no way to objectively measure the age of a cartoon character. Not to mention, the US Supreme Court has already ruled on this, and Texas's bill will inevitably be struck down as unconstitutional: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/law-jan-june02-scotus_04-16

Photorealistic AI-generated imagery is a much more complicated matter, however. As far as the law is concerned, it should definitely depend on what the AI model is using. If it's using real-life children as the template, then that's not the same as if it's using completely fake imagery with entirely fictional, nonexistent children. The latter is still absolutely disgusting, of course, but it doesn't involve real harm to real children. Using real children as a template for fake CP, however, does obviously harm real children. I definitely should have gone into more detail about what the AI is trained on in the article.

of course the kike is a pedophilia defender... not surprsprising as kikes are hereditary pedophiles

 

[Watt]

What other states haven't done this yet? Make them enact this law right now or blow them skyhigh.

 

[Gigafly]

of course the kike is a pedophilia defender... not surprsprising as kikes are hereditary pedophiles

Japan didnt have CP laws until 2014 btw

 

[meijak]

Read the room buddy

And then what? SmallAnus is the moral arbiter and the judge and jury? I at least want to know which rules/laws we should follow.

 

[Fagon]

And then what? SmallAnus is the moral arbiter and the judge and jury?

Correct.

 

[SackjakWABAG]

Fucking aryan
just report baraag to dreamhost for them to shut down and cut ties to
many many more pedo sites like skibidifarms need so

 

[Watt]

And then what? SmallAnus is the moral arbiter and the judge and jury? I at least want to know which rules/laws we should follow.

I don't think linking an offsite CP article is really up for moral debate. And I really thought society as a whole knew that throwing CP links online around willy nilly is what we call "disgusting and illegal".

 

[_account]

And then what? SmallAnus is the moral arbiter and the judge and jury? I at least want to know which rules/laws we should follow.

Shlog law ≠ US law, you can be banned for saying things that you wouldn't get arrested for. I suggested you don't debate it further.

 

[Soyteen Liker]

Fucking aryan
just report baraag to dreamhost for them to shut down and cut ties to
many many more pedo sites like attentionwhores need so

Someone on kiwifarms did and it got denied for "spam"
Post in thread 'Soyjak.Party / The Sharty'

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/soyjak-party-the-sharty.145349/post-20833674

 

[meijak]

I don't think linking an offsite CP article is really up for moral debate. And I really thought society as a whole knew that throwing CP links online around willy nilly is what we call "disgusting and illegal".

It's on wikipedia and not 'p in accordance with US law, where as far as I know this website is registred. That's not even the issue, because no one is arguing that the image halal or should've been linked to int he first place.

 

[NigKiller_Tojo]

Japan didnt have CP laws until 2014 btw

false, it was already made illegal in the 90s, the 2014 law just made it stricter. I do agree that we need to be cracking down harder on degeneracy, however. Why didn't muttmericans make any laws about it while they occupied us anyway, they basically made all the laws.

 

[Gigafly]

Someone on kiwifarms did and it got denied for "spam"
Post in thread 'Soyjak.Party / The Sharty'

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/soyjak-party-the-sharty.145349/post-20833674

View attachment 164230View attachment 164231

They didn't get denied, it was an automated message. The email asked for them to reply with what concern they had.

 

[ribbon]

we would have the album cover as a signature

marge

 

[ribbon]

The album cover is a naked 11 year old girl doing some suggestive post that the US government deemed not illegal due to "artistic" reasons so it's allowed on Wikipedia on the literal infobox of the album cover, even when the album cover was changed due to massive backlash

no yeah i know that i was margeing at the signature thing

 

[NigKiller_Tojo]

The album cover is a naked 11 year old girl doing some suggestive post that the US government deemed not illegal due to "artistic" reasons so it's allowed on Wikipedia on the literal infobox of the album cover, even when the album cover was changed due to massive backlash

can you ban the kike moonmetropolis as well xe was defending ai 'p and drawn 'p

 

[Gigafly]

false, it was already made illegal in the 90s, the 2014 law just made it stricter. I do agree that we need to be cracking down harder on degeneracy, however. Why didn't muttmericans make any laws about it while they occupied us anyway, they basically made all the laws.

It was banned in 1999, that's pretty recent. It's not our job to make sure Japs don't molest children.