You don’t have to decode a Big-Bang theory to discover that Sanskrit is a semi-artificial literary dialect that was never a spoken language for any one in the world.
The authority of Sanskrit Language, the celebrated Seer of Kanchi Sankara Mutt, Mahaswamy. Shri. Chandraserakarendra Saraswati, says clearly that SANSKRIT WAS NEVER A MOTHER TONGUE TO ANY ONE IN THE WORLD!
Do you require a better scholar of Sanskrit to vouch His declaration?
A FRAUD ON INDIA AND THE PEOPLE OF INDIA! : Congress Rulers in Delhi and Karnataka fooled the Nation by creating and maintaining an artificial village with tutored Sanskrit speakers only to keep Sanskrit in the list of Scheduled Languages of India. This is being maintained by all central Governments.
Do not get confused with Vedic Language and sanskrit Language. Both are altogether different ones.
Vedic Language was a oral spoken language of vedic Aryans who were vagabonds (tribals) of European sects. The fact that all European Languages and Vedic, sanskrit Languages come under the family of Indo-European Languages is a clear testimony that Sanskrit is not a Native Language of Indian soil.
Indo-European family of Languages have the following Subdivisions: Albanian, Armenian, Balto-Slavic (Baltic and Slavic languages), Celtic, Germanic, Hellenic (including Greek), Indo-Iranian (Indo-Aryan, Iranian, and Nuristani), Italic (including Romance languages), Anatolian, Illyrian, Daco-Thracian, Tocharian.
One can see that Sanskrit is a Indo-Aryan language of Indo-Iranian sub-group of Indo-european family of Languages. From the name Indo-Aryan, any one can understand that both Aryan and Sanskrit are not native languages of India.
For instance, Anglicans are natives of England and Indians are natives of India. When Anglicans invaded and ruled India, some Angicans married Indians and these mixings gave birth to a new class of ethnicity called Anglo-Indians.
Can Anglo-Indians claim earlier nativity to India than the native Indian?
The answer is a CLEAR "NO"
Similary Indo-Aryans are the new ethnicity came into existence in Indian sub-continent after Aryan Invasion and they married Indian women to produce Indo-Aryans and Indo-Aryan Languages. Indo-Aryans can never have nativity earlier than the ethnic natives.
Again, why the orthography and phonetics of Vedic and sanskrit Languages are different from their sister Indo-European Languages?
The chronological ORDER of Listing phonetic Vowels separately, phonetic Consonants separately, Consonantal Vowels separately (the composite phonetic alphabets obtained by the ad-mixing of every vowel with every other consonants) is very unique to all native Indian Languages that have orthographic roots in Tamil, the only spoken ancient Classic Language of India.
How did Sanskrit and Vedic languages, a member of the non-native Indo-European family of Languages, get their orthography and phonetics identical with that of Tamil, but did not get the orthography genes of their European sister languages?
The answer is very clear - Vedic and Sanskrit Languages have adopted the world's first ever spoken language, namely Tamil Language, after coming to India (where all Indian Native Languages had similar orthography and phonetics).
Can you Compare the two Incomparable Languages, Tamil, the oldest classical spoken language of the world that is native to India, with Sanskrit, a semi-artificial literary dialect of the Vedic Language (Vedic language was once Spoken, but is a DEAD LANGUAGE today), that has its foreign roots in Europe?
Can a language like Vedic or Sanskrit that has copied verbatim the entire Orthography and Phonetics from Tamil Language claim scientific temper?
I shall give you a mocking example for the scientific content of Vedas.
Some Vedic hymns are sung in praise of rain God for cutting the flying black mountains(pregnant black clouds) with his sword(lightning)!
Such were the maturity levels of primitive Vedic folks who composed such Vedic Hymns in praise of Lord Varna!
Now, coming to your question. Can this Aryan Vedic Folk song be Scientific?
If they are be it!
- Vedas (Vedic hymes) are Aryan race’s folk tradition outcomes that has authorship only with the Aryan Race but not with individual authors, evolved when the Aryans did not have Alphabets and Numbers (no orthography).
- Tamils’ Sangam Literature, the contributions of individual Tamil Sangam era scholarly poets, (who had a well developed classical language having a written Grammar supported by a phonetic orthography,) are the hall marks of Human Civilization and Scientific Temper!
Can you compare the maturity of the Tamil Sangam Literature with the Aryan Race Folk songs like Vedas?
The language ‘Sanskrit’, as its name reveals, is a bettered, corrected, semi-artificial language formed from the best features of Tamil Orthography and vocabulary of Prakrit and Vedic Languages.
- Panini wrote the Grammar ‘Astathyaayi’ for a language (that came to existence after Vedic and before Sanskrit) he called ‘Bhasha’. He did not write ‘Astathyaayi’ for Sanskrit.
- Three Centuries after the period of Panini, Sanskrit was created in first century AD. The creators of Sanskrit adopted the Panini’s Grammar.
- The creators of Sanskrit grouped alphabets as Shiva Sutras to fool people that Sanskrit was created by Lord Shiva! Panini did not commit such foolish act of cheating people in the name of Lord Shiva!
- Can such a dubious language Sanskrit be the “lingua Franca” of Bharat varsh?!! Let Lord Shiva save Bharat!!
- Was Sanskrit ever existed as Everybody's Language?
- Better consult Manu Smriti that specifies the punishment of pouring molten metal into the ears of any Sutra who overheard Sanskrit utterance by accident!
- Sanskrit remained the Language of Aryan Brahmans only, till recently.
- There is a millennium gap between Sanskrit and Vedic Language.
- The first Sanskrit literature was created by Kalidasa between 4th–5th century Christian Era.
- The age of Sangam literature are at least 600 years ahead of the creation of Sanskrit Language.
There is nothing called ‘Vedic Sanskrit’ (that ever existed)! It was just Vedic Language!!
Remember that, in Tamil, folk songs are treated as folk songs only.
Tamils don’t fool around others posing the Folk songs as the media to connect with Gods as Aryans do!
Now you can pose questions like
Did Tamil really originate before Python? Which one is the more scientific?
Did Tamil really originate before C Language? Which one is the more scientific?
Did Tamil really originate before Fortran Language? Which one is the more scientific?
Did Tamil really originate before Cobol? Which one is the more scientific?
