and... what about all the jobs that don't require them? what if i want to be a pig farmer? a welder? a fast food franchise owner? manufacturing lawnmowers? literally none of these require you to remember that the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell or whatever, and infact the jobs that do require you to remember that, general public school education is not going to be enough and you learn allthat in college courses anyway, so whats the point then?
besides, the idea that EVERYONE has to be an engineer or scientist set bad precedents for the job market. not everyone is cut out for jobs that require genuine critical thinking and a desire to explore (most amerimutts dont have those), and the idea that 100% of people have to get "good" jobs is preposterous. this rhetoric has led to stem degrees being massively overproduced compared to demand, so now if you get a stem degree (ESPECIALLY computer science and environmental science degrees, the 2 most overhyped and oversaturated degrees around) goodness gracious you're gonna have a terrible time finding a job in an oversaturated market.
trve, but being able to memorize about my special interest and being able to shit out an essay with all the big words doesn't necessarily mean im going to be a smart person. there need to be ways to verify for both skills at least.
hm? it may be simple to you, it may be simple to me, but how come so many people in this world are mouthbreathing idiots that willingly give advertisers on facebook all their life details so they can get scammed for ai-generated crap products, fall for multi-level marketing schemes, believe that hard work somehow means they'll be a billionaire in 2 more weeks and not just end up with more work, believe self-worth is determined by whether you're following the latest astroturfed "luxury" scam craze, get into consumer debt and then blame the exactly 10 troons in women's sports for it, believe that everything is fine because they audited themselves and found nothing wrong, and believe blatant lies on the idiot box because they only know a filter bubble?
hm? some people are just natural-born retards (see: special ed classes), but most people don't bother to learn outside what they've been told, so you might as well teach them to do just that instead of by design of the system equating learning = le bad.
the whole point of school is to teach people things?? if they're not going to learn it on their own, you might as well force them to learn basic finance and basic methods to detect bullshit. people can learn to not be retarded, we just have to teach them to not be sheep brainwashed creatures.
i'd rather the teacher choose than someone who has never worked in education in the state tbh. you must understand, teachers act retarded and evil because they aren't paid enough for this shit and they're treated like disposable asswipes by the government who would rather give infinite money to billionaires than fund education. i have a dad who worked public high school for some months and can confirm that nobody lasts more than a few months teaching, so i can confirm all this second hand. most behavior from teachers can just be summed to, they're overworked, stressed, and getting paid less than a walmart door greeter to deal with america's finest lead-infused niggers all day long. oh, and the state puts ridiculous requirements on them scuh as having to pass every single child regardless if they did any of the work. oh whats that, the student did nothing but smoke crack all day in school? clearly its because you didn't develop a relationship with them in a class of 40 other needy niglets.
!!!
profiting off of something you're required to take to get into public colleges?? this seems inherently exploitative.
suddenly this reminds me, after the first free standardized test you take paid for by the school you CAN retake the ACT and SAT, but it costs $70 to take it. if they gave it for free at all. and there is such thing as superscoring, you take the test multiple times, you'll score higher and lower on some but you can put your highest sections to combine it into one high score.
in which case, is this not inherently unfair that rich fucks can stuff the test multiple times until they get their desired score (and then bribe the harvard jannies to let their shitassed kid get in via the swim team)? would this not mean the ACT/SAT is not a reliable indicator of intelligence, if its only a metric of how much time you're willing to spend grinding factoids on anki instead of working a dayjob or caring for your own needs, and how much you're willing to blow on retesting?
>and... what about all the jobs that don't require them? what if i want to be a pig farmer? a welder? a fast food franchise owner? manufacturing lawnmowers? literally none of these require you to remember that the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell or whatever, and infact the jobs that do require you to remember that, general public school education is not going to be enough and you learn allthat in college courses anyway, so whats the point then?
This is less a critique of standardized testing a more a critique of the education system format in general
>
hm? it may be simple to you, it may be simple to me, but how come so many people in this world are mouthbreathing idiots that willingly give advertisers on facebook all their life details so they can get scammed for ai-generated crap products, fall for multi-level marketing schemes, believe that hard work somehow means they'll be a billionaire in 2 more weeks and not just end up with more work, believe self-worth is determined by whether you're following the latest astroturfed "luxury" scam craze, get into consumer debt and then blame the exactly 10 troons in women's sports for it, believe that everything is fine because they audited themselves and found nothing wrong, and believe blatant lies on the idiot box because they only know a filter bubble?
hm? some people are just natural-born retards (see: special ed classes), but most people don't bother to learn outside what they've been told, so you might as well teach them to do just that instead of by design of the system equating learning = le bad.
the whole point of school is to teach people things?? if they're not going to learn it on their own, you might as well force them to learn basic finance and basic methods to detect bullshit. people can learn to not be retarded, we just have to teach them to not be sheep brainwashed creatures.
Problem with forcing them is that you’ll be forcing me too. I shouldn’t be forced to waste time doing niggershit because retarded niggers exist.
>
profiting off of something you're required to take to get into public colleges?? this seems inherently exploitative.
suddenly this reminds me, after the first free standardized test you take paid for by the school you CAN retake the ACT and SAT, but it costs $70 to take it. if they gave it for free at all. and there is such thing as superscoring, you take the test multiple times, you'll score higher and lower on some but you can put your highest sections to combine it into one high score.
in which case, is this not inherently unfair that rich fucks can stuff the test multiple times until they get their desired score (and then bribe the harvard jannies to let their shitassed kid get in via the swim team)? would this not mean the ACT/SAT is not a reliable indicator of intelligence, if its only a metric of how much time you're willing to spend grinding factoids on anki instead of working a dayjob or caring for your own needs, and how much you're willing to blow on retesting?
>muh profiting… le bad!
Your right, let’s get rid of food companies too since food is required to live and making money off important things is le bad. We should have the government control our food supply entirely, I’m sure they won’t do a horrible and inefficient job at it (which goes back to my point that SAT’s and AP’s are the gold standard of standardized testing, and also happen to be operated by a private company, which unlike the government is competent enough to make half decent exams)
>rich people can take it multiple times
If your that fucking poor you can probably get a waiver
Also retaking it isn’t as beneficial as you make it out to be, and will generally only increase it by less than a hundred points unless you really fuck up the first exam
Again, you say it’s not a good measure of intelligence. You mean to say it’s not perfect. It’s definitely a way better measure of intelligence than any other option that exists besides a fucking iq test, which they can’t do because the kikes will get mad because discrimination or eugenics or whatever.
Also the stuff on the SAT isn’t “factoids”, it’s very basic maths and English and if you don’t know such simple material you shouldn’t be going to college
And you say it’s not fair enough because rich people can retake it. Which I mean it would probably be better if you could only take it once.
However even in the current state it is still fairer than almost anything else used in college admissions. GPA depends on your high school and nigger teachers, and extracurriculars like research and shit will be much easier if your family has connections
